Intel launches Wildcat Lake as Core Series 3 for value laptops and edge systems — six consumer SKUs built on 18A promise 'all-day' battery life

News
By
Published

Six consumer SKUs ship today on Intel 18A.

Intel Core Series 3 Wildcat Lake press image
(Image credit: Intel)

Intel has today launched its Core Series 3 mobile processors, confirming the official branding for the silicon tracked under the Wildcat Lake codename since late 2024.

The lineup covers six consumer SKUs plus an edge-only variant, all fabbed on Intel 18A, with more than 70 laptop designs scheduled from Acer, Asus, Dell, HP, Lenovo, MSI, Samsung, and others through the rest of 2026. Intel is positioning this family as the value-segment counterpart to Panther Lake, which shipped as Core Ultra Series 3 following its debut at CES in January.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Luke James
Luke James
Contributor

Luke James is a freelance writer and journalist.  Although his background is in legal, he has a personal interest in all things tech, especially hardware and microelectronics, and anything regulatory. 

11 Comments Comment from the forums
  • usertests
    There's not much we didn't learn from the last few weeks of leaks. Except the 4 MiB memory side cache, which could be important to keeping LPEs from being dog slow, but I'm not that familiar with it and I recall previous implementations of this cache were underwhelming.

    Goofy benchmarks with too much AI focus and no comparisons to Alder Lake-N. Intel Core 7 150U is Alder Lake-U Refresh Refresh with 2+8 cores. Wildcat Lake should do pretty well in most ways against the cheapest ADL-U 2+4 chips. But it may end up as a better laptop choice than full ADL-U 2+8 from the single-thread and efficiency improvements.

    I hope the market largely ignores the Core 3 304 with its single graphics core. Instead of pushing that one as the new N100.

    No info about a configurable TDP in the articles I looked at. But it could be 10 Watts.
    Reply
  • IntelUser2000
    usertests said:
    There's not much we didn't learn from the last few weeks of leaks. Except the 4 MiB memory side cache, which could be important to keeping LPEs from being dog slow, but I'm not that familiar with it and I recall previous implementations of this cache were underwhelming.
    Lunarlake's memory side cache was dog slow. It was only faster than system memory.

    Pantherlake's LPEs are much better. I'm not sure if that's due to the memory side cache improving or other things. It was less than 5% difference from regular E cores on the ring bus, whereas Lunarlake LPE was 15-20%. Combined with the small improvements in Darkmont, LPEs are 20% faster per clock in Pantherlake generation.

    Pantherlake has an improved memory controller with lower latency plus a memory compression capability. Pretty sure all of them helps the LPE immensely.
    usertests said:
    No info about a configurable TDP in the articles I looked at. But it could be 10 Watts.
    They are much more granular than they say in the sheets. Pantherlake's 12 Xe models didn't show SO-DIMM support, yet it does.

    For example we users can download throttlestop and adjust power settings in fine granularity. Manufacturers can do that in firmware(UEFI).

    It's a two-chip device that doesn't use Foveros, instead uses traditional organic interposers with UCI as a connection, so it should be cheap to make. The presentation says it allows cheaper 6-layer motherboard as well.
    Reply
  • User of Computers
    usertests said:
    I hope the market largely ignores the Core 3 304 with its single graphics core. Instead of pushing that one as the new N100.
    N100 was half the core count of the rest of ADL-N, whereas this entire lineup (except the aforementioned core 3) has the same number of cores. Thus, no reason not to have options up to the core 7 imo.
    Reply
  • User of Computers
    IntelUser2000 said:
    It's a two-chip device that doesn't use Foveros, instead uses traditional organic interposers with UCI as a connection, so it should be cheap to make. The presentation says it allows cheaper 6-layer motherboard as well.
    WCL is actually a really neat tech demo for this reason entirely: it's the first commercial, widely shipped part from any manufacturer to use UCIe (I believe Ian quoted around 40 million units by the end of this year).
    Reply
  • usertests
    User of Computers said:
    N100 was half the core count of the rest of ADL-N, whereas this entire lineup (except the aforementioned core 3) has the same number of cores. Thus, no reason not to have options up to the core 7 imo.
    If the Intel Core 3 304 is as rare as the dual-core Intel Processor N50, and virtually all WCL laptops, mini PCs, and SBCs are using the Core 5 315 at a minimum, I'll be happy. Losing a P-core would be bad, but the 1 Xe core graphics could be the bigger loss.

    A CrossMark result for a "Core 3 310" was spotted, but it didn't make it into this announcement.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    So many SKUs, yet so few apparent differences!
    Reply
  • usertests
    bit_user said:
    So many SKUs, yet so few apparent differences!
    Frankly, that's a good thing. What appeared to be the majority of all of Alder Lake-N was sold as gimped quad-cores, but here there is only a narrow path for the consumer to getting less CPU/GPU. 304/305 may be focused on embedded and extremely low-end stuff like touch panels.

    I think they've learned lessons from Lunar Lake, where every SKU had all 8 CPU cores enabled. Some had only 7/8 Xe2 cores and less L3 cache.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    usertests said:
    Frankly, that's a good thing.
    I disagree. It bugs me to see such seemingly minor differences between them. I think it argues for fewer SKUs.

    usertests said:
    What appeared to be the majority of all of Alder Lake-N was sold as gimped quad-cores,
    That's a somewhat different issue, IMO. Intel didn't have to make so many of its SKUs and such a large amount of its product volume be quad-core or charge such a premium for the 8-core models.

    I think the main reason the quad-cores dominated their product lineup is that 4 cores are enough for most of that market. That meant they could pitch the 8-core models as high-end, and charge a price to match.
    Reply
  • IntelUser2000
    User of Computers said:
    WCL is actually a really neat tech demo for this reason entirely: it's the first commercial, widely shipped part from any manufacturer to use UCIe (I believe Ian quoted around 40 million units by the end of this year).
    Since physically they are basically using the same method as Raptorlake having PCH and using DMI to assemble the whole thing, UCIe is a minor change in that case.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    IntelUser2000 said:
    Since physically they are basically using the same method as Raptorlake having PCH and using DMI to assemble the whole thing,
    I'm not totally clear on what you mean by that statement. Are you referring to Raptor Lake laptop CPUs with the PCH die as a separate chip on the package? How did Raptor Lake differ, in that regard, from what prior Intel laptop CPUs did?
    Reply