Best offers
|
Core i7 I7-920 Quad Core Processor... | $349.99 Dell Home More info |
|
Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition Quad... | $189.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
Core i5 750 Qaud Core Processor... | $199.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
Core i7 Extreme Edition I7-975 Quad... | $974.99 TigerDirect More info |
|
Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition Quad... | $174.99 TigerDirect More info |
- upcoming amd processors
- mobile cpu charts
- mobile processor benchmark
- mobile cpu benchmarks
- laptop cpu chart
- upcoming amd cpu
- notebook processors benchmark
- notebook cpu benchmarks
- intel and notebook cpu
- intel processor chart
- amd mobile processor chart
- amd turion 64 x2 benchmark
- mobile cpu compared
- mobil cpu benchmark
- mobile processors chart
Partners
The Games selection
violent :
More Mindless Violence
Basic shooting game, but still so powerful! Use the mouse to take aim and shoot at the little beasties before they get to you. Use Space to reload....
|
action :
Yoyo the Star
Yoyo is a young girl who recently graduated and dreams to become a movie star (don't we all). You'll have to guide her on the path to stardom,...
|
Sponsored links
- Email |
- Print |
- Comments (9) |
- Share
As this article documents our latest update of our Mobile Processor Charts, you will find all benchmark results on the Mobile CPU Charts page. You will find all Turion 64 X2 mobile processors and the majority of Intel’s Core 2 Duo E7000 lineup. Remember that the results can directly be compared to our Desktop CPU Charts as well.
Summary
Although AMD’s Turion 64 X2 performance cannot match the performance level of the current 45-nm Core 2 Duo T8000 family, the AMD mobile processors’ performance is more than sufficient for business or multimedia notebooks. Both AMD and Intel are about to launch their next-generation platforms – Puma on the AMD side and Montevina for Intel. Although Puma most likely will not be able to play in the performance champion’s league, it will be the first mobile chipset to support hybrid graphics. This means that Puma platforms will be able to run on integrated graphics for maximum power saving when you are one the road, and on a discrete graphics processor once you plug the notebook into a power port. If AMD were to add support for external PCI Express graphics (see external cabling specification) it would be possible to purchase a high-end graphics box that you could use either on a desktop PC or a notebook.
Intel will once again offer the most advanced mobile platforms from a feature standpoint. Montevina will increase processor and Front Side Bus clock speeds while maintaining or slightly reducing power consumption. It will introduce the first mobile quad-core processor while increasing processing performance across the entire portfolio, and offer the first combined WLAN/WiMAX networking solution for the mainstream market And Intel will also take DDR3 memory into the mobile space.
It will be interesting to see how well AMD can position its Puma platform against the Centrino 2 offering from Intel. A lot will depend on Intel’s pricing policy, which might or might not allow AMD to conquer a good part of the mainstream. The high end clearly is reserved for Intel while we see AMD dominating the $500-$750 notebook sector. Eventually, you might also get excellent deals on the current generation of AMD hardware, which will soon be considered outdated, though not obsolete.
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
- What computers did you own in the old days? Share your story!
- Core 2 duo vs Quad Core Help Please
- When is 4mb L2 necessary over 2mb of L2 cache?
- Whats the fastest socket 479 CPU for my HP nc8000 notebook laptop
- Dual Core Notebook CPUs Explored
- Sony Vaio SZ - overclock the GPU - How to?
- Dell Notebook Overclocking...
- cool n quiet?
- new AMD X2 3800+ Koolance rig is up and running!
- overclocking laptop cpu or graphics card
- HP says 2gig max
- The Graphics State of the Union
- need suggestions for testbed setup for notebook components
- Clevo 4xx series compatible motherboard






So if this is an updated mobile cpu chart, where are the T8100's T9300's?
45nm is the way to go on laptops
I also miss some processor in the T5000 series, because they are very common in low-end laptops. Good work anyway!
I too am very dissapointed that your mobile CPU chart doesn't inlcude the T5000 series of processors from Intel. I realize that everyone wants to see the "high end", but some of want to compare it to the low end as well.
I just purchased an HP 17" laptop and was trying to find some data on the T5000 processors because that is what comes stock on the model I purchased. I wanted to see if it was really worth it to spend the extra ~$200 to upgrade to the T9000 processors. I had to look elsewhere to get that kind of comparrison.
To bad for Toms' sites, I found another reputable site that I will now use as a reference tool. Shame on Tom's for not covering the mid and low range products.
65nm Turion X2's support DDR2-800. Why wasn't this speed used instead of DDR2-667?
toms you are no1 but you need more laptop cpu and gpu charting.
Wow, I knew my TL-60 was pathetic but I never realized just how much
I like the charts, I like the interactivity and I love that we can compare mobile and desktop CPUs. I just wish mine didn't rank so low.
Copying an earlier comment, these charts need many more chips on them. I just bought an otherwise screaming laptop with an 8800M GTS GPU but only T5550 CPU, and want to know how much improvement I'd get moving up to a T8xxx or T9xxx.
Plus in general I miss how the charts used to allow highlighting of specific processors for easier comparison.
Tom's used to be number 1. They are jut OK now. If you don't know more than the authors and are not able to independently screen the information you can't trust the data or conclusions at Tom's anymore
Copying an earlier comment, these charts need many more chips on them. I just bought an otherwise screaming laptop with an 8800M GTS GPU but only T5550 CPU, and want to know how much improvement I'd get moving up to a T8xxx or T9xxx.Plus in general I miss how the charts used to allow highlighting of specific processors for easier comparison.
That's a bit pointless why review lots when the few they have are done poorly anyway.
Whats the point of adding these benchmarks without demonstrating that your Notebook battery will last - less, more or the same between models/price/performance.
Tom's grab a load meter and find the DC power load of each of these processors on your Solar Power equipment (direct DC input not AC PSU, to emulated a Notebook Battery).
1. record peak and typical power in "each & every" application/benchmark
2. record power consumption at system IDLE