Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Sennheiser HD515 G4ME Headphones

Tom's Holiday Buyer's Guide 2008, Part 1
By , Chris Angelini

http://www.sennheiserusa.com
$159
By: Chris Angelini

You spend big money on processors and even bigger money on graphics, so why would you go cheap when it comes to audio? Well, it’d be easy if you didn’t know any better—once upon a time I was perfectly content with AC’97 and bundled 2.1-channel speakers. But then I was introduced to Sennheiser. First, I owned the company’s HD580s. Then, I upgraded to the HD600s. Both audiophile-quality cans, I was talked into picking up a headphone amplifier from HeadRoom and was quickly sold for life.

The HD600s cost more than $300 though, and they’re arguably more headphone than what the average PCs audio subsystem really needs. Hoping to find something a little more apropos to computing, we revisited Sennheiser’s headphone lineup and came across the HD 515 G4MEs. Most obviously, these are over-the-ear headphones designed for comfort. I’ve yet to find a set of earbuds that’d last for more than 15 minutes without extreme discomfort, and supra-aural on-ear headphones can be fatiguing as well. The HD515s fit around the ear, distributing 255 grams of total weight across a well-padded headband and the velvety ear pads.

Sennheiser’s quality carries over from the comfort-enhancing padding to the 1.8” (3.5 mm) stereo jack especially suited to sound cards (many high-end headphones employ 1.4” plugs). And whereas you’d likely expect multimedia headphones to tether you down with a few feet of cord, the Sennheiser setup includes a nine-foot detachable single-sided OFC (oxygen-free, which lasts longer without becoming brittle) copper cable.

The HD515’s open ear cups aren’t meant to save everyone else from hearing whatever you’re playing. Rather, they’re designed with sound quality in mind, letting sound waves propagate freely away from the transducer. A frequency range between 14 Hz and 26 kHz straddles both ends of the spectrum for what a human can hear. And while we’ve fielded ambitious claims from speaker vendors before that just didn’t sound plausible after a lengthy audition, Sennheiser’s audio reproduction is truly impressive.

Although the HD515 G4MEs are marketed toward the gaming enthusiast, these things work well for any audio application on the PC, from gaming to music creation to video playback. There is a price to pay for Sennheiser’s premium headphones, but when you compare them to the price of a multi-channel speaker system, the difference shouldn’t be as jarring.

Display all 54 comments.
This thread is closed for comments
  • 2 Hide
    ravenware , November 5, 2008 5:28 AM
    Quote:
    Dell 3008WFP Ultrasharp 30"

    , we can’t think of any computer user who wouldn’t be thrilled to get one.


    Gamers. The 8ms response time is a little on the slow side.
  • 0 Hide
    Portall , November 5, 2008 6:42 AM
    Nope. You won't see difference between 8 and 4ms :) 
  • 1 Hide
    V3NOM , November 5, 2008 8:30 AM
    well you can... CRT vs LCD is quite clear.
  • 3 Hide
    cangelini , November 5, 2008 8:41 AM
    I play on the prior year's model (3007) all the time without any problems. Don't pass up gaming on a 30" display without at least trying it for yourself!
  • 2 Hide
    Anonymous , November 5, 2008 9:13 AM
    Dual-link DVI does NOT need two seperate cables. HDMI's video component IS DVI. I'm amazed this slipped through and into the article:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Visual_Interface
  • 0 Hide
    radnor , November 5, 2008 9:22 AM
    Well, you will actually. If you ever seen them side by side you will notice the difference. 5ms seems to be the sweet spot.
  • 4 Hide
    Anonymous , November 5, 2008 10:36 AM
    Just a word of warning to anyone purchasing this monitor and wanting to watch Blu-Ray titles on it. If you use DVI as your input it can not display Blu-Ray titles above 1920 x 1080. Now I know this is the native res on the monitor. But HDCP will fail if the monitor's resolution is set any higher than this. This is due to a design flaw in the monitor's chipset. This wouldn't be a problem if all it meant was you had to reset the resolution when you want to watch a movie, but the problem is, 1920 x 1080 is not the same aspect ratio as 2560 x 1600. So your picture is vertically stretched. I know this because I bought one and spent hours in forums and on the phone with Dell before finding this out. I returned the monitor, because at $2000, there's no excuse for buggy HDCP support over DVI.
  • 0 Hide
    Anonymous , November 5, 2008 11:01 AM
    what happened to the really cute girl you guys had last year ?
  • 1 Hide
    xsamitt , November 5, 2008 12:04 PM
    I think I'd take the 30 inch dell if it was free......Guess I won't be having one now for sure.lol.
    8 mills is just to slow.And Leigon thanks for the heads up.

    I do hope the new items to come are more interesting than this first round.
  • -2 Hide
    Anonymous , November 5, 2008 12:19 PM
    What happened to the great girl from last year? The blond on here looks strung out and or too gothy for a Christmas ad.
  • 7 Hide
    zak_mckraken , November 5, 2008 12:48 PM
    Quote:
    Ugly girls...


    Oh really? Come on pal, let's see some pictures of your wife/girlfriend so we can compare. Well, assuming you have one of course.
  • 2 Hide
    jameshan2k , November 5, 2008 12:56 PM
    I usually don't go for blondes, but the blonde is quite nice....
  • 0 Hide
    zak_mckraken , November 5, 2008 1:13 PM
    About the response time, 8ms does seem a tad high but we have to be careful here. Most manufacturers will advertise their monitors as having a 2ms or 5ms response time. However, when you look at the charts, most of the time this response time is the maximum the monitor can reach during a dark scene or a low action gaming sequence. This is often not representative of an average use and the so-called 5ms monitor will most likely be around 6ms-7ms in everyday situations. Same thing applies for contrast since every manufacturer uses their own chart for measuring it. The best way to know how your monitor will perform in real life is to look at comparative charts made by neutral parties, like Tom's, who uses the same methods to compare response time, contrast and color fidelity with all monitors.

    As for this particular Dell 3008WFP Ultrasharp 30", I have really no idea if it's suitable for movies and gaming or not. However, is Chris says it is, it's usually enough for me! Unfortunately, I just bought a Samsung T220 and it pleases me enough. Anyway, I do not have 2 grand to put on a monitor... yet.
  • 3 Hide
    crockdaddy , November 5, 2008 1:39 PM
    Both ladies are quite lovely. If I recall correctly wasn't it Tamara whom graced the last two years as the xmas model?
  • -1 Hide
    xsamitt , November 5, 2008 1:46 PM
    How do you find The Samsung T220 picture wise and lag?
  • 0 Hide
    zak_mckraken , November 5, 2008 2:08 PM
    Quote:
    How do you find The Samsung T220 picture wise and lag?


    While not the "perfect" monitor, it's definitely one of the best (if not the best) 22 inches monitor around. The colors are rich and true, the contrast is sharp and I haven't notice any lag at all, although I only play World of Warcraft and watch some Divx. Still, the difference was amazing when I switched my old Philips 19" with it! I'm pretty sure the same quality would apply on a fast-paced FPS or a Blu-Ray HD movie. However, I would recommend the T240 if you intend to use your monitor to watch full HD content. Samsung also offer the same models with HD at the end (T220HD) which has a integrated tuner, if you're into that stuff.
  • 0 Hide
    cruiseoveride , November 5, 2008 3:47 PM
    blond++;

    Santa Baby, a 30" Samsung TFT too, dark grey with a blond elf. I've been an awfully good girl.
  • 0 Hide
    KITH , November 5, 2008 3:52 PM
    I recently purchased the samsung t260hd it along with the t240hd are a couple of the only ways to get an hdtv with that small of a screen still with 1080p support.
Display more comments