The Graphics Cards Articles
- NVIDIA Detonator FX 45.23
- PVR On A Budget
- Comparison of Four 800,000-Pixel Camcorders
- VGA Card Buyer's Guide 07/2003
- Radeon 9800 256 MB
- Workshop: A Digital Facelift for Your Analog Movies
- NVIDIA GeForceFX 5900 Ultra: The Way FX is Meant to be Played!!
- Water March: Gainward CoolFX
- Introducing ATi's New Middle Class: The Radeon 9600 PRO
- New Drivers: ATi FireGL X1 & Z1 with High Performance - Finally
Forum
- Anand does Nehalem!!!
- With Intel CPU prices so low, can AMD compete?
- Quick and Dirty Upgrade to Dinosaur PC
- CPU Buyers' Guide (updated 10 May 2008)
- AGP GPU - Business v. Gaming Use
- Worst PC Build Screw Ups
- GUIDE: 3+GHz Core 2 Duo Budget System for $426 (Overclock)
- Gremlin in my Overclock... major help needed
- overclocking my E6600 on INTEL DG965RY
- AMD dead or Alive
Related Content
-
intel integrated graphics
-
Intel s Integrated Graphics
-
Integrated Intel graphics media accelerator 3100
-
graphics performance
-
integrated
-
integrated graphic
-
performance
-
vista xp performance
-
hdd performance
-
celeron performance
-
cpu performance
-
raid 5 performance
-
3d graphics
-
x2 graphics
-
expresscard graphics
-
gaming graphics
-
sli graphics
-
graphics test
Sysmark 2002
1:02 PM - September 3, 2003 by
Lars Weinand
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: integrated, graphics, performance
Syndication:
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: integrated, graphics, performance
Syndication:
Table of Contents:
Sysmark 2002
At the end of our test suite, we examined the performance under Windows. That is to say we were interested in seeing whether using integrated graphics would adversely affect performance during normal "office-type" work in Windows programs. Our benchmark of choice for this test was Bapco's Sysmark 2002.



The results showed that none of the integrated GPUs have a negative impact on performance in Sysmark. Only the SIS315 returned a slightly lower score.
- Previous page 3DMark 2001SE
- Next page Conclusion