Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

System Builder Marathon, Sept. 2011: $2000 Performance PC

System Builder Marathon, Sept. 2011: $2000 Performance PC
By

System Builder Marathon, September 2011: The Articles

Here are links to each of the four articles in this month’s System Builder Marathon (we’ll update them as each story is published). And remember, these systems are all being given away at the end of the marathon.

To enter the giveaway, please fill out this Google form, and be sure to read the complete rules before entering!

Day 1: The $2000 Performance PC
Day 2: The $1000 Enthusiast PC
Day 3: The $500 Gaming PC
Day 4: Performance And Value, Dissected

Introduction

Superb multi-card scaling is part of the reason why Tom’s Hardware editors have used AMD graphics hardware in every System Builder Marathon machine this year, a fact that may have escaped die-hard AMD fans who've missed seeing the company's CPUs compete up at the top of the spectrum.

And yet, just because we've doted on AMD's graphics-oriented value doesn't mean the company enjoys performance superiority. The fact remains that Nvidia has the most powerful GPU around in its GeForce GTX 580. The only reason we've shied away from its high-performance flagship up until now was that the cost of other necessary system components gobbled up our budget first. That is, until today.

With Intel’s super-fast Sandy Bridge processors and high-end SSDs already populating our top-end build, graphics performance was one of the few places we could noticeably improve the performance of our $2000 configuration without significantly expanding our budget. Recent drops in memory and motherboard prices brought us within $120 of our graphics upgrade goal, forcing us to scale back on two specific items that you’ll certainly notice in the finished system photo.

$2000 Performance System Components
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3: LGA 1155 Intel Z68 Express $150
Graphics2 x EVGA 015-P3-1580-AR GeForce GTX 580 SLI $980
ProcessorIntel Core i7-2600K: 3.4 GHz-3.8 GHz, 8 MB Shared L3 Cache $315
MemoryG.Skill F3-14900CL9D-8GBXL: DDR3-1866 C9, 4 GB x 2 (8 GB) $80
System DriveAdata S511 120 GB, SATA 6Gb/s SSD $170
Storage DriveWestern Digital Caviar Green WD20EARS 2 TB, 7200 RPM HDD $80
OpticalLite-On iHAS224-06: 24x DVD±R 8x DVD+RW 6x DVD-RW $21
CaseAntec Three Hundred Illusion $70
PowerSeasonic SS-850HT: 850 W, ATX12V v2.31, 80 PLUS Silver $120
Heat SinkCooler Master Hyper 212 Plus RR-B10-212P-G1 $30
  Total Cost  $2016


Putting all of our sacrifices out in the open, we scaled back on the two items all readers could see from the outside: the case and the optical drive. While we truly believe a high-end multi-purpose system should probably have an Blu-ray burner, the higher-performance graphics cards would boost the score of today’s build in our value comparison.

The case, on the other hand, would only affect perceived worth, since the Antec Three Hundred Illusion has already proven itself an excellent performer through several of our earlier builds.

While today’s build appears to be a budget-buster, its price is $16 higher since we place our order. That's right, it was exactly a $2000 collection of hardware a month ago.

Display all 120 comments.
Top Comments
  • 15 Hide
    anonymous x , September 20, 2011 5:45 AM
    decembermousePoor case decision. Inadequate PSU (did you seriously expect good overclocking results?).

    No, this case cools better than many (most?) cases more expensive than it. 2x 120mm intake is more than adequate for SLI cards with room for air to flow between them. Did you even look at the power consumption numbers? The system when overclocked only consumed 697w at load from the wall (actual consumption is less), while the PSU is rated at 850w.
  • 12 Hide
    cangelini , September 20, 2011 7:20 AM
    iam2thecroweand also, there is no crysis 2 benchmark? why not? get some newer games to use for benching toms please.


    Check out Scott Wasson's excellent story about Crysis 2 on The Tech Report. Tons of artificial geometry to favor Nvidia's tessellation-emphasizing architecture. Not sure that's something we want to fold into our benchmark suite. We are looking at new games, but bear in mind that as soon as we ditch these, we kill the comparison points from the previous quarter. That's why you don't see the SBMs shift benchmark suites as often!
Other Comments
  • 4 Hide
    wrazor , September 20, 2011 4:55 AM
    Great article. I am wondering, if instead you had gone with the EVGA 3GB GTX 570 SLI, maybe OC would have been possible? 2000$ is quite a bit of money. I wonder how these babies would hold out for Nvidia's 3D experience? Personally I am not a big 3D fan in theatres(headache and stuff), but gaming has to have a chance. You had an article on projectors gaming experience? Do it with 3d performance\eyefinity with the system marathon builds? That would be really cool. :) 
  • -1 Hide
    Yargnit , September 20, 2011 5:01 AM
    I'm actually surprised that after the recent micro-stutter article you didn't opt for 3x 570's/6950's/6970's instead of 2x 580's. the First two should be cheaper than 2x 580's, while the third would cost very similarly.

    All three should have provided at least equal performance, and been better on intangible benefits to micro stuttering.
  • -1 Hide
    DjEaZy , September 20, 2011 5:17 AM
    ... a bit of stagnation in performance department... no big difference in Q2 and Q3 models... gonna wait til bulldozer...
  • 15 Hide
    anonymous x , September 20, 2011 5:45 AM
    decembermousePoor case decision. Inadequate PSU (did you seriously expect good overclocking results?).

    No, this case cools better than many (most?) cases more expensive than it. 2x 120mm intake is more than adequate for SLI cards with room for air to flow between them. Did you even look at the power consumption numbers? The system when overclocked only consumed 697w at load from the wall (actual consumption is less), while the PSU is rated at 850w.
  • -1 Hide
    Pawessum16 , September 20, 2011 6:10 AM
    Where the heck did they get that SSD for $170????? It's $205 on Newegg, and that's after a $35 price drop. What a steal....
  • 0 Hide
    Hupiscratch , September 20, 2011 6:14 AM
    These SBM keep becoming cheaper. At first was 5k, then 2.5k and now is 2k for the enthusiast one. The recession is beating hard.
  • 8 Hide
    karma831 , September 20, 2011 6:21 AM
    All I can say is...WOW you guys have bad luck with overclocking.
  • -1 Hide
    jestersage , September 20, 2011 6:29 AM
    maybe one of the 120mm fans should have been placed on the side panel? just wondering...
  • 9 Hide
    iam2thecrowe , September 20, 2011 6:44 AM
    all i have to say is, ditch the crappy Gigabyte motherboard and get sonething better, and for the price difference get the i5 2500k, its no real loss to the i7.
  • -4 Hide
    iam2thecrowe , September 20, 2011 6:47 AM
    and also, there is no crysis 2 benchmark? why not? get some newer games to use for benching toms please.
  • 2 Hide
    crisan_tiberiu , September 20, 2011 6:50 AM
    I have my i7 2600k @ 4,2 GHZ. But @ 4,4 my PC will shut down in Intel Burn test extreme setting. Try that aswell :) , without disabling the CPU protection in BIOS.
  • 4 Hide
    shoelessinsight , September 20, 2011 7:11 AM
    Personally, I would have gone with a 1.5 TB storage drive and used the extra cash on a motherboard with more overclocking potential. Still, it's good to see a GPU upgrade.

    Thanks for the builds!
  • 3 Hide
    cangelini , September 20, 2011 7:16 AM
    pawessum16Where the heck did they get that SSD for $170????? It's $205 on Newegg, and that's after a $35 price drop. What a steal....


    It was purchased on Newegg about a month ago in preparation for this series, actually =)
  • 6 Hide
    cangelini , September 20, 2011 7:18 AM
    YargnitI'm actually surprised that after the recent micro-stutter article you didn't opt for 3x 570's/6950's/6970's instead of 2x 580's. the First two should be cheaper than 2x 580's, while the third would cost very similarly.All three should have provided at least equal performance, and been better on intangible benefits to micro stuttering.


    As you saw in that piece, micro-stutter was most apparent on more mainstream cards. Something like the GTX 580 isn't going to demonstrate the issues seen there, whereas a GTX 560/HD 6850 might.
  • 12 Hide
    cangelini , September 20, 2011 7:20 AM
    iam2thecroweand also, there is no crysis 2 benchmark? why not? get some newer games to use for benching toms please.


    Check out Scott Wasson's excellent story about Crysis 2 on The Tech Report. Tons of artificial geometry to favor Nvidia's tessellation-emphasizing architecture. Not sure that's something we want to fold into our benchmark suite. We are looking at new games, but bear in mind that as soon as we ditch these, we kill the comparison points from the previous quarter. That's why you don't see the SBMs shift benchmark suites as often!
  • 0 Hide
    hmp_goose , September 20, 2011 7:34 AM
    Very educational. Thank you for the insight on what panned out and what didn't. (Tower CPU coolers like to feel ducted?)
  • 6 Hide
    Crashman , September 20, 2011 7:42 AM
    decembermouseNow I know we'll see the usual "well this is meant to be a learning experience, learn from our errors and improve for next time" comments, but these are not mistakes I expect to see Tom's writers making.
    No, because the only serious issue with the build was the motherboard VRM not outputting enough current to go to 1.38V. Everything else was great, which means everything else you commented on was wrong. You only need to look at the power and heat page to see how wrong. The big question is, what we should sacrifice to get the extra $100...in order to achieve an extra 5% O/C with another motherboard.
  • 1 Hide
    ScrewySqrl , September 20, 2011 7:43 AM
    A question I have is why none of the system builder marathon PCs at any price level spend $15-20 on additional fans? More airflow usually equals a cooler system.

  • -5 Hide
    qwertymac93 , September 20, 2011 7:58 AM
    TBH i would've traded the 580s for 570s(or 6970s) and got a better case. The 300 is a nice case on a budget, but this is a high end enthusiast PC, we can spare a few extra $ for better cable management, more airflow, better water cooling support, more expansion slots...

    Overall the build certainly wasn't bad, just not quite 10/10 for me :) 
    Oh, and do you think the overclocking would've been improved with a cooler that blows over the vrms, like the Cooler master GeminII S?
Display more comments
React To This Article