Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Micron P420m SSD Review: 1.4 TB Of PCI Express-Attached Storage

Micron P420m SSD Review: 1.4 TB Of PCI Express-Attached Storage
By

After the success of its P320h, Micron is following up with the P420m, an MLC-based PCI Express x8 add-in card aimed at more read-oriented enterprise customers. How does it compare to the company's SLC-based flagship? We benchmark ours thoroughly.

When we first starting seeing PCIe-based storage in the enterprise market, it was obscenely expensive. Tens of thousands of dollars per device was not unheard of. But like all flash-based products, prices dropped and they continue to do so. Some of this has to do with shrinking feature geometry. However, manufacturers are also getting more strategic about using the right flash technology for their products. If we were still looking at predominantly SLC- and eMLC-based drives, price per gigabyte would still be very high.

Now, we're talking about enterprise storage here, so write latency and endurance are factor very prominently in any discussion of performance. Many applications continue to demand the very best of the best. At the same time, IT managers are getting a lot smarter about how to apply solid-state tech to their workloads, which is why we're starting to see a lot more products built to deliver very fast reads at more economical prices.

This reflects a deliberate effort to break the enterprise SSD market into increasingly smaller and better-targeted pieces. Those read-focused SSDs represent one of the fastest growing segments because of how well-positioned they are. Typically, you get outstanding read performance from them, along with mediocre write throughput and endurance. In server caching applications, this trade-off is almost always worth it. They're so heavily weighted towards read operations that paying for equally great write performance isn't justified. And the trend is transcending 2.5" SSDs, carrying over to the PCIe-based storage market as well.  

With the P420m's introduction, Micron is pushing MLC technology into its PCI Express-based product line. The two main benefits that come from using MLC NAND in 2.5" drives carry over: higher capacities and lower costs. Micron's P420m consequently serves to complement the P320h, which we reviewed in Micron RealSSD P320h Review: A PCIe Drive Capable Of 3.2 GB/s. To recap, the P320h is an SLC-powered monster that serves up excellent 4 KB read and write IOPS, along with great write endurance. It basically gives you all of the good attributes of single-level cell flash and PCI Express, along with the combination's greatest weakness, price. At $10/GB, the P320h is not cheap. Micron hopes that its P420m is more accessible without sacrificing performance.

The P420m is actually available in two different form factors. One is a 2.5" drive that connects via eight second-gen PCI Express lanes, and ships in 350 and 700 GB capacities. The second, which we're reviewing today, is a half-height, half-length (HHHL) PCIe-based add-in card, also communicating across eight second-gen lanes. This second version will surface in 700 and 1400 GB capacities, doubling the P320h's largest configuration.

As it does with most of its enterprise-oriented offerings, Micron is keeping pricing under wraps. Our sources tell us to expect less than $5/GB, though.

Micron PCIe Product Lineup
Product
P420m
P320h
Form Factor
HHHL
User Capacity (GB)
700
1400
350
700
Interfacex8 PCI Express 2.0
Sequential Read (MB/s)
3300
3200
Sequential Write (MB/s)
600
630
1900
4 KB Random Read (IOPS)
750,000
785,000
4 KB Random Write (IOPS)
50,000
95,000
205,000
Power Comsumption (Active)22 W
30 W
25 W
Power Consumption (Idle)8 W
10 W
Write Endurance (TBW)
5 PB
10 PB
25 PB
50 PB

Based only on read performance, the difference between Micron's P420m and P320h is marginal, which is a good thing since the P320h excels in read tests. Given a significantly lower price tag, the P420m should represent a significantly better value in read-intensive tasks as a result.

Of course, write performance isn't as attractive. Although, while 95,000 random 4 KB write IOPS is quite a bit lower than the P320h's, that figure also represents the drive at steady state, whereas most mainstream SSD vendors cite fresh-out-of-box specifications.

Write endurance also takes a hit. Though, considering the rated specification is still 20% of the SLC-equipped drive, that's a really good sign.

Display 8 Comments.
This thread is closed for comments
  • 0 Hide
    merikafyeah , September 8, 2013 10:42 PM
    Seems like enterprise non-volatile storage is finally starting to approach the speeds of comsumer ram drives:
    http://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/romex-fancycache-review-ssd-performance-at-13gbs-and-765000-iops-in-60-seconds-flat/

    Considering that the cost/GB of RAM is about $7/GB, it may not be such a bad idea to use RAM storage + backup generators instead of traditional non-volatile flash nand.
  • 2 Hide
    BasslineJunkie , September 9, 2013 8:38 AM
    Take my money!
  • 2 Hide
    rezzahd , September 9, 2013 9:46 AM
    Maybe once the price drops I would pick one of these up, but I think we all know it will be a while before that happens.
  • 2 Hide
    BasslineJunkie , September 9, 2013 1:53 PM
    Quote:
    Maybe once the price drops I would pick one of these up, but I think we all know it will be a while before that happens.

    Same here. I love the concept but price/gb isn't where it should be. But i do have some extra pci express slots that need filled!
  • 0 Hide
    utomo , September 9, 2013 3:41 PM
    It is good to see good competition like now. keep comparing like this and hope soon we will get the good mature technology. now the SSD still have many improvement ideas. manufacturer need to work harder to win the market which is big.
  • 0 Hide
    ACTechy , September 9, 2013 8:50 PM
    Awesome. Later down the road, when the price falls, these are going to be the thing to have. Really like PCI based SSD.
  • -1 Hide
    urbanman2004 , September 12, 2013 11:07 PM
    TL;DR. I could benefit from something like this saving space on my system. It must have a hefty price
  • 0 Hide
    hakesterman , September 20, 2013 8:28 PM
    i Don't think paying around 600 Dollars for a storage card is feasible.