Shop for All
|
Core 2 Duo E8400 Dual Core Processor |
Compare the top 5 lowest prices by hovering your mouse over the product names on the left |
$199.99 |
|
Core i7 I7-920 Quad Core Processor | $349.99 | |
|
Core 2 Quad Q6600 Processor | $199.99 | |
|
Core 2 Q9550 Quad Core Processor | $219.99 | |
|
Phenom II X4 940 Quad Core Processor | $189.99 |
- phenom vs phenom 2
- phenom vs athlon
- amd phenom vs amd athlon
- phenom vs intel
- amd athlon 64 x2 6000
- phenom benchmark
- phenom vs athlon x2
- phenom vs x2
- amd phenom vs intel
- quad core processor comparison
- phenom vs
- athlon 64 vs phenom
- athlon 64 x2 vs phenom
- phenom vs core 2 quad
- phenom vs intel quad core
Partners
The Games selection
violent :
Interactive Buddy
Unwind on your interactive buddy: Do anything you want to him, it will earn you money, and you can buy other stuff to torture him with.
|
crazy :
PC Breakdown
What is worst than a Fatal Error occuring during a game you did not save? Unleash your rage at your PC in this game. Blow it to pieces, it feels so...
|
Sponsored links
Phenom vs. Athlon Core Scaling Compared
Table of contents
- 1 – How Well Does Phenom Scale With Clock Speed?
- 2 – A Quick Processor History Lesson
- 3 – Athlon 64 X2 At 2.2, 2.4, 2.6 And 2.8 GHz
- 4 – Phenom 9000 At 2.2, 2.4, 2.6 And 2.8 GHz
- 5 – Test Setup
- 6 – Benchmark Results
- 7 – Gaming, Continued
- 8 – Audio Benchmarks
- 9 – Video Benchmarks
- 10 – Video, Continued
- 11 – Application Benchmarks
- 12 – Application, Continue
- 13 – Application, Continued
- 14 – Synthetic Benchmarks
- 15 – Synthetic, Continued
- 16 – Synthetic, Continued
- 17 – Synthetic, Continued
- 18 – Windows Vista Experience Index
- 19 – Conclusion

When we compared AMD's Athlon 64 X2 and the new Phenom 9000 quad core processor last month, Compare Prices on AMD Phenom Processors we forced Windows to utilize only a single processing core, in an effort to understand the real performance differences between the AMD64 architecture and the Stars architecture of the Agena/Barcelona core. Depending on the particular benchmark, the results made clear that Phenom is indeed up to 20% faster than Athlon in a core to core comparison, thanks to its optimizations and the L3 cache. In addition to these performance gains, Phenom's unified quad core design and smart cache architecture should provide more benefits under heavily threaded conditions. We haven't looked at the performance difference using all processing cores, as you will find this information in our launch article "Phenom 9700, AMD's 1st Quad Core CPU". All benchmark results, including a comparison with all Core 2 processors, can be found in our Interactive CPU Charts.
While the core to core analysis provides interesting results about architecture performance across typical benchmarks, it does not answer the question that will eventually be crucial, once Phenom's TLB issues are fixed (B3 stepping) and the chip is available at higher clock speeds in quantities. The question is simply whether the quad core will scale well enough to attack Intel at the high end. In other words: Will clock speed increases translate into higher performance gains than just similar clock speed increases with an Athlon 64 X2? And at which clock speed will power consumption become an issue?
Of course we wanted to get some answers, so we grabbed our test system again: the Asus M3A32 MVP using AMD's 790FX chipset, an Athlon 64 X2 6000+ processor, a Phenom 9000 engineering sample (unlocked) Compare Prices on AMD Phenom Processors , two 1 GB DDR2-800 DIMMs by Corsair, our Western Digital reference hard drive, and Gigabyte Radeon HD3850 reference graphics card. We ran both processors at 2.2, 2.4, 2.6 and 2.8 GHz clock speeds, to see how well the clock speed increase translates into additional performance.
