Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

System Builder Marathon, Sept. 2011: $500 Gaming PC

System Builder Marathon, Sept. 2011: $500 Gaming PC
By

System Builder Marathon, September 2011: The Articles

Here are links to each of the four articles in this month’s System Builder Marathon (we’ll update them as each story is published). And remember, these systems are all being given away at the end of the marathon.

To enter the giveaway, please fill out this Google form, and be sure to read the complete rules before entering!

Day 1: The $2000 Performance PC
Day 2: The $1000 Enthusiast PC
Day 3: The $500 Gaming PC
Day 4: Performance And Value, Dissected

Introduction

Our $500 System Builder Marathon gaming PC from June 2011 departed from the norm by centering on a budget-oriented Intel Sandy Bridge-based platform that could not be overclocked. At all. It had to stand or fall based on its out-of-box processing power.

The machine actually achieved its goals by providing the best stock performance, the best gaming performance, and, by far, the best efficiency to date for any build under $600 of our series. That's pretty incredible for a processor that couldn't be overclocked.

But there was also a bit of controversy surrounding the build, sparked by the author himself. You see, for the same cost, I could have taken the AMD configuration from the quarter prior and jumped up to an even more attractive Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition CPU.

Furthermore, price drops that went into effect by the time our last series went live meant the higher-end Phenom was available for just $113, which nearly covered the cost of even more powerful graphics hardware.

So, for those of you who read last quarter's series or participated in the discussion, it should come as no surprise to find a Black Edition Phenom II X4 and Radeon HD 6870 listed in the component table below.

$500 Gaming PC System Components
Component Model Price
CPUAMD Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition$120
CPU CoolerAMD boxed heatsink/fan0
MotherboardASRock M3A770DE$60
RAMCrucial Ballistix sport 4 GB (2 x 2 GB) DDR3-1333 BL2KIT25664BA1339$25
GraphicsSapphire 100314-3L Radeon HD 6870 1 GB$175
Hard DriveSeagate Barracuda ST500DM002 500 GB SATA 6.0Gb/s $40
CaseNZXT Gamma Classic Series GAMA-001BK$36
PowerAntec EarthWatts Green EA430D 430 W$44
OpticalSamsung 22x DVD Burner SATA Model SH-222AB$19
Total Price
$519


The Phenom II X4 955 BE gives us a nice frequency increase across its four physical cores and the flexibility of an unlocked CPU multiplier. The bundled cooler that comes with the Black Edition chips is a step above the all-aluminum versions bundled with AMD’s more mainstream quad-core offerings, so we expect more potential when it comes time to overclock.

While financial constraints kept us from stepping up to a fancier motherboard compared to past budget-oriented builds, at least we weren't forced to use a stripped-down microATX model, as we had to last quarter. Once again, then, the goal was to spend as close to $500 as possible and still beat the previous build. Although our Phenom II X4 of choice had settled back in at $120, we were still able to buy a nicer graphics card thanks to steep drops in memory prices (our 4 GB memory kit sold for just $25).

And while we're on the subject of money, let's take an opportunity to refresh you on some of our practices here. If you're familiar with our System Builder Marathon, then you know that the budget is dedicated to hardware components alone. It doesn't include software or peripherals. Also, we don't factor in Newegg's combo deals or manufacturer mail-in rebates, since they're often not available when it comes time for you to replicate our builds. Lastly, shipping costs and taxes don't get considered. In case you're interested, there was a $20 rebate available on our chosen graphics card, which could get our price down to $499. But we still would have had to pay $11 for shipping.

Ask a Category Expert

Create a new thread in the Reviews comments forum about this subject

Example: Notebook, Android, SSD hard drive

Display all 84 comments.
This thread is closed for comments
Top Comments
  • 23 Hide
    slicedtoad , September 22, 2011 5:18 AM
    very nice article, i was wondering how the 955 oced would do against the i3.

    While there are many unthinkable things in this build, the low price of $500 is also unthinkable. That's less than an ipad....
  • 17 Hide
    Outlander_04 , September 22, 2011 6:36 AM
    Its a good $500 build .except it cost $520 and the motherboard is a dead end part .
    For another $30 you can include an AM3+ board with the latest 970 series chip set that is fully compatible with Bulldozer.
    As it is this build is a dead end , and its out of date in 3 weeks

    But its still a better computer than the previous intel build
  • 17 Hide
    alchemy69 , September 22, 2011 5:05 AM
    Time to bring on the usual motley crew of fanboys and everyone who just knows that they could do better.
Other Comments
  • 17 Hide
    alchemy69 , September 22, 2011 5:05 AM
    Time to bring on the usual motley crew of fanboys and everyone who just knows that they could do better.
  • 4 Hide
    Anonymous , September 22, 2011 5:05 AM
    Ugly case! I know I am stating the obvious, but seriously...
  • 13 Hide
    Outlander_04 , September 22, 2011 5:13 AM
    The i3 2100 is a remarkable cpu , but it just cant beat 4 physical cores and a bit of overclocking .
  • 23 Hide
    slicedtoad , September 22, 2011 5:18 AM
    very nice article, i was wondering how the 955 oced would do against the i3.

    While there are many unthinkable things in this build, the low price of $500 is also unthinkable. That's less than an ipad....
  • 6 Hide
    Anonymous , September 22, 2011 5:22 AM
    Why have the charts reduced to an unreadable size for this article?
  • 12 Hide
    Zero_ , September 22, 2011 5:28 AM
    Nice. Finally someone who knows how to get value for money. I approve :p 
  • 16 Hide
    zooted , September 22, 2011 5:38 AM
    This is my favorite build this sbm. I just love the fact that you can have a true 1080p gaming experience for $500 bucks.
  • 7 Hide
    mayankleoboy1 , September 22, 2011 5:38 AM
    whats with the fuzzy and unreadable charts?
  • -2 Hide
    bobfrys , September 22, 2011 5:44 AM
    This is a tad bit better then the one I built off of the earlier build i used from toms. (Built it soon after school ended).
  • 11 Hide
    lunyone , September 22, 2011 5:51 AM
    This is probably the ONLY $500 build (except for the very 1st one) that I've agreed on mostly (not liking the case too much, but it works in this budget).

    The last $500 build just was crap generally (micro-ATX and not many options on the mobo, IMHO).

    This budget gaming rig is really close to what I'd build for a friend/family member that wanted to have a gaming rig. I'd change a few things, of coarse, but the overall direction (and selection of parts) is SPOT ON, IMHO!! Good job guys at TH!!!
  • 2 Hide
    hmp_goose , September 22, 2011 5:59 AM
    What's that? The Surprise Fourth Build will not be the $2k version? Someone's going to poke around in the grey area between the i3-2100 and the i5-2500? How much extra cash will be allowed?

    Why do posts like this "sound" like the something from the '60s Batman TV show?

    Tune in tomorrow! :-P
  • 3 Hide
    Tijok , September 22, 2011 6:17 AM
    First off, great build, the balance of parts is great, and almost exactly what I would recommend to someone in this budget area.

    But seriously, what is going on with the small/ low res charts?
  • 4 Hide
    _Pez_ , September 22, 2011 6:19 AM
    This Rig Rocks ! I would only change the case :)  maybe a cooler master storm.
  • 1 Hide
    Rizlla , September 22, 2011 6:34 AM
    The first of this months builds that are great and you can see there is a budget that was thought of.
  • 17 Hide
    Outlander_04 , September 22, 2011 6:36 AM
    Its a good $500 build .except it cost $520 and the motherboard is a dead end part .
    For another $30 you can include an AM3+ board with the latest 970 series chip set that is fully compatible with Bulldozer.
    As it is this build is a dead end , and its out of date in 3 weeks

    But its still a better computer than the previous intel build
  • 1 Hide
    Proximon , September 22, 2011 6:54 AM
    It was a good comparison, and the right build to do, because we got an honest look at the differences and advantages to each platform.
    That said, I would have to say that it's not the right $500 system for most gamers. The P II X2 555BE would perhaps let you get a better board, making it a smarter buy at $520, and of course some excellent Rosewill combo deals (that are always on) would help out with the case and PSU.
  • -4 Hide
    cobra5000 , September 22, 2011 6:56 AM
    Nice to see the 955 finally get to stick it to the i-3. That and the old boy is what, two years old? Way to go AMD! Its a shame Tom's could'nt point that out. Not really surprising though, with the tiny charts hiding how the 955, DOMINATED, the i-3 at high resolution.
  • 0 Hide
    cmcghee358 , September 22, 2011 7:30 AM
    Nicely done. I can atest to the volume of that freaking stock fan too. I had mine up to 7000 RPM on my HTPC. I HAD to replace it, it sounded like an old ventalation fan in a bathroom
  • 4 Hide
    Martell77 , September 22, 2011 7:56 AM
    @Cobra5000 - Are you really that happy that a stock SB I3 is beaten by a P-II x4 OC'd just past the AMD X4 top end proc? Ya, its 2 years old but the I3 isn't exactly a high end part. If the P-II had kept up or beaten a I5, then you should be cheering. I think you meant "the tiny charts hiding how the 6780, DOMINATED, the 6850 at high resolutions." The wins the 955 got were in productivity apps due to its 4 physical cores.

    I'm hoping that bulldozer will finally give Intel something to worry about. Some pricing wars would be really nice. But I'm not holding my breath.

    I think it would be interesting if they changed the video card to a 6850 and show how much the processor change actually made a difference.
  • 2 Hide
    cypeq , September 22, 2011 8:18 AM
    mayankleoboy1whats with the fuzzy and unreadable charts?


    Toms is saving up bandwidth by annoying readers.
Display more comments