The Ryzen 5 7600X3D is easily the best value in gaming CPUs right now, even 18 months after it was released. Outside of games, however, it loses some ground, particularly to Intel’s recent competition, which has made strides in both gaming and productivity.
Pros
+
Only slightly slower than Ryzen 7 7800X3D in games
+
Often demands less than 70W when gaming
+
Inexpensive, and finally available online
Cons
-
Core Ultra 5 250K Plus offers twice the multithreaded performance at around the same price
-
Locked multiplier
-
Slower than the Ryzen 5 7600X and 9600X in most applications
Why you can trust Tom's Hardware
Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.
We’ve had the Ryzen 5 7600X3D for a while, and it’s always placed highly in our CPU benchmark hierarchy, as well as shown up among the best CPUs for gaming. But we never gave the chip a proper review because it was only available to a select number of people. Launched in 2024 as a Micro Center exclusive, it’s always been an elusive chip, packing AMD’s coveted 3D V-Cache while arriving (initially) below $300. We’re taking a stab at reviewing it now because you can actually buy the Ryzen 5 7600X3D online.
Micro Center recently started selling on Amazon, and although you’ll pay a premium versus in-store pricing ($240 compared to $200 at current prices), the Ryzen 5 7600X3D still represents an excellent value. It’s such a good value for gaming PCs that it’s worth an in-depth review a year and a half after it was released.
AMD has moved on to its Zen 5 range, but we haven’t seen a replacement for the Ryzen 5 7600X3D yet, with most of the 3D V-Cache attention going toward higher-end SKUs like the Ryzen 7 9850X3D and Ryzen 9 9950X3D2. In the $200 to $250 price bracket, the Ryzen 5 7600X3D remains uncontested for gaming performance.
Intel hasn’t sat idly by in the last 18 months, though. Although we saw the disappointing release of Arrow Lake, the new Arrow Lake Refresh CPUs from team blue are surprisingly potent. In particular, the Core Ultra 5 250K Plus puts up a fight against the Ryzen 5 7600X3D’s gaming prowess around that same $200 to $250 price bracket.
Although the 7600X3D still represents a great value for gamers, it’s lost some of its edge in application performance. AMD’s X3D chips have never been the first choice for productivity, outside of a flagship like the Ryzen 9 9950X3D, but the X3D nerf, combined with a six-core CCD on a last-gen architecture, isn’t a great recipe for blazing application performance.
We’ll cover both gaming and productivity in our in-depth benchmarking throughout this review, as well as look at power draw and efficiency to see where the Ryzen 5 7600X3D lands.
AMD’s second-gen 3D V-Cache with Zen 5 CPUs have spoiled gamers a bit, offering basically identical specs to the non-X3D parts, by placing the SRAM chunk under the die instead of on top of it. The Ryzen 5 7600X3D still keeps the original design with the extra SRAM on top, which acts as an insulating layer between the cores and the IHS. That means lower clock speeds, lower peak power, and no access to traditional multiplier-based overclocking, which is otherwise available on Zen 4 chips.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Here, the power is cut down dramatically, to a 65W TDP and 88W PPT. Chips like the Ryzen 7 7800X3D not only earned their stripes on the back of exceptional gaming performance, but also high efficiency. Zen 4 overall is very efficient, so although that 65W TDP limits the Ryzen 5 7600X3D in some non-gaming workloads, the extra cache is more than enough to make up for power shortcomings in games.
The biggest victim of lower power is peak clock speed, with the Ryzen 5 7600X3D topping out 600 MHz lower than the base Ryzen 5 7600X. Peak clock speeds aren’t the biggest performance factor in most modern games, which is something we saw on full display with our recent Ryzen 7 9850X3D review.
On the cache front, the 7600X3D packs in 102 MB total. That’s technically lower than the Ryzen 7 7800X3D, but not by much. Both chips have the same 96 MB SRAM chunk bonded to the top of the die, giving them both access to the same amount of shared L3 cache. The 2 MB haircut comes from the L2 cache located on the cores.
The article talks about the 7600x3d but another one not to discount is the 7500x3d. Nearly as fast and worth looking at if its significantly less.
Availability/pricing for the 7500X3D may be bad. For example, I see the 7600X3D for $230 on Amazon via Micro Center, cheaper than the $240 stated. But the 7500X3D is $300 from a different third party seller.
In that case for sure the 7600x3d makes sense. However if someone is in the USA near Microcenter, they have a bundle with a 7500x3d, 16gb ram and b850 board for $300 which really is a great deal if you happen to have access to Microcenter.
