Page 1:Because We Can...
Page 2:CPU And Cooler
Page 3:Motherboard And Memory
Page 4:Graphics And Storage
Page 5:Audio And Optical
Page 6:Case And Power
Page 7:Accessories And Installation
Page 9:Test Settings
Page 10:Benchmark Results: First-Person Shooters
Page 11:Benchmark Results: Real-Time Strategy
Page 12:Benchmark Results: Audio And Video Encoding
Page 13:Benchmark Results: Productivity
Page 14:Benchmark Results: Synthetic
Page 15:Power Consumption
Benchmark Results: Synthetic
Unlike applications, synthetics typically show the largest possible performance differences between various components. We start with 3DMark.
The four graphics processors of our current build beat three similar graphics processors in our December system, while the differences in scores were largely tied to the number of GPUs.
PCMark loves the dual-Intel SSD drives in RAID 0, spreading some of the hard drive test’s huge lead into its system-and-productivity tests.
Sandra’s arithmetic benchmark shows a surprisingly small performance gain for the latest system, while its multimedia benchmark shows a surprisingly large gain. If we averaged out the scores from both of these CPU tests, we’d likely find something closer to the “expected” performance gain.
DDR3-1800 memory speed gives the new system a colossal advantage in Sandra memory bandwidth.
- Because We Can...
- CPU And Cooler
- Motherboard And Memory
- Graphics And Storage
- Audio And Optical
- Case And Power
- Accessories And Installation
- Test Settings
- Benchmark Results: First-Person Shooters
- Benchmark Results: Real-Time Strategy
- Benchmark Results: Audio And Video Encoding
- Benchmark Results: Productivity
- Benchmark Results: Synthetic
- Power Consumption