Best offers
|
Core i7 I7-920 Quad Core Processor... | $349.99 Dell Home More info |
|
Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition Quad... | $185.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
Core i5 750 Qaud Core Processor... | $199.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
Core i7 Extreme Edition I7-975 Quad... | $974.99 TigerDirect More info |
|
Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition Quad... | $174.99 TigerDirect More info |
- average power consumption of pc
- sysmark 2007
- sysmark 2007 download
- sysmark 2007 preview
- sysmark 2007 preview rating
- typical power consumption of a pc
- sysmark benchmark
- amd athlon 64 x2 5000 sysmark 2007
- sysmark 2007 preview productivity
- sysmark 2007 result
- total power consumption for pc
- sysmark 2007 intel
- 2007 preview rating
- sysmark® 2007 preview
- sysmark test
Partners
The Games selection
violent :
Interactive Buddy
Unwind on your interactive buddy: Do anything you want to him, it will earn you money, and you can buy other stuff to torture him with.
|
crazy :
PC Breakdown
What is worst than a Fatal Error occuring during a game you did not save? Unleash your rage at your PC in this game. Blow it to pieces, it feels so...
|
Sponsored links
The SYSmark test was rather easy, as its runtime is rather long (80 minutes and up) and simply tracking the power requirement during the benchmark run resulted in an interesting diagram. Let's start with average power, and the power required to complete this benchmark:

SYSmark is close to reality when it comes to performing typical application scenarios. The difference between 98 W average power requirement for the Intel system and 124 W for the AMD system equals 26%. This means that, on average, the AMD system required 26% more power for the workload to complete. While the average power and power required over the benchmark runtime was similar in our first run with 3DMark06 and PCMark05 looping, the actual power required was much higher this time.

The difference in average power consumption was 26%, but the difference in total power required (Wh) to complete the entire benchmark is roughly 50%! How can this be? Let's look at the power requirement diagram to get the answer:
Click to enlarge
The power consumption diagram, which shows the power requirement for the entire duration of the SYSmark 2007 Preview run, makes very clear why the AMD system required 50% more energy to complete the benchmark, although the difference in average power requirement was only 26%. The Athlon 64 X2 5000+ system took 14 minutes longer to complete the benchmark! During this time, the Intel system was already running idle again.
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
- E8500 vs X2 7750
- amd bulldozer: will it bulldoze or will it be bulldozed?
- AMD pushes out three more triple-core chips!!
- Will there be a 'new' manufacturers race; to 'Fusion'?
- Intel got Phenom Triple Core locked!!!
- HOWTO: Overclock C2Q (Quads) and C2D (Duals) - Guide v1.6.1
- Thoughts and questions regarding C2D Temperature Guide
- CPU temp readings - Bios vs MBM vs Speedfan
- Is power for Duron nealry all at 12 volts?
- Question on RAM energy usage.
- New Build - Comments or suggestions
- Voltage/Current Rqmts for ASUS A7V8X
- The Power Saving Guide, Part 2
- The MMO-machine...






