- 2007 HDD Rundown: Can High Capacities Meet High Performance?
- PC Hard Drives That Pack More Power for Less Dough
- 2.5" Hard Drives by Toshiba and Western Digital Rev Up
- 15 Years Of Hard Drive History: Capacities Outran Performance
- Enterprise Storage Solutions Solid Integration for Enthusiasts
- 200 GB, 2.5", SATA: Fujitsu's MHV2200BT
- Conventional Hard Drive Obsoletism? Samsung's 32 GB Flash Drive...
- Quo Vadis, Hard Drive? The 50th Anniversary of the HDD
- Find Your Notebook Hard Drive: 2.5" Performance Charts
- Seagate 500 GB External Hard Drive Goes eSATA
- CPU Buyers' Guide (updated 10 May 2008)
- Beginner in Need of Advice
- First time builder needs advice and any help you can spare
- New PC for my mum. Q6600 for photoshop?
- gigabit efficiency question
- Help tweaking my Overclock
- Cross post for info from any dedicated OC'ers out there
- E6600 OC question
- first overclock
- MEMORY FAQ (please read before posting)
8 Or 16 MB Buffer
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: understanding, hard, drive, performance
Syndication:
8 Or 16 MB Buffer

Although there are still many drives using a 2 MB buffer, 8 MB can be considered standard today for mainstream desktop hard drives, and there are more and more drives with 16 MB cache as well. Larger hard drive caches not only make sense because of low DRAM prices, but from a technical standpoint as well. Hard drives utilize algorithms to pre-cache data, or to leave data in the cache memory in case it is requested again. Serial ATA drives also require a certain amount of memory to store incoming commands, because most products are capable of reorganizing these in order to process them as efficiently as possible, requiring little physical head movement. This feature is called Native Command Queuing (NCQ), and it also requires some memory to work, although the memory requirements are minor.
We wanted to check if there are differences between drives that sport 8 MB or 16 MB of buffer memory. Since we had received almost the complete Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 family, we picked four different 500 GB models to answer the question. All of them use three platters and only vary in terms of their interfaces - SATA/300 or UltraATA/100 - and cache size.
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 500 GB Comparison Table
| Manufacturer | Seagate | Seagate | Seagate | Seagate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product | Barracuda 7200.10 | Barracuda 7200.10 | Barracuda 7200.10 | Barracuda 7200.10 |
| Model | ST3500630A | ST3500630AS | ST3500830A | ST3500830AS |
| Capacity | 500 GB | 500 GB | 500 GB | 500 GB |
| Spindle Speed | 7,200 RPM | 7,200 RPM | 7,200 RPM | 7,200 RPM |
| Platter | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Cache | 16 MB | 16 MB | 8 MB | 8 MB |
| Native Command Queuing (NCQ) | No | yes | no | yes |
| Interface | UltraATA/100 | SATA/300 | UltraATA/100 | SATA/300 |

- Previous page Platter Diameter
- Next page Test Setup