| Test Hardware | |
|---|---|
| Processors | Intel Xeon E3-1275 (Sandy Bridge) 3.4 GHz, LGA 1155, 8 MB Shared L3, Hyper-Threading enabled, Power-savings enabled |
| Intel Core i7-2600K (Sandy Bridge) 3.4 GHz, LGA 1155, 8 MB Shared L3, Hyper-Threading enabled, Power-savings enabled | |
| Motherboards | Asus P8B WS (LGA 1155) Intel C206, BIOS 0401 |
| Memory | Crucial 8 GB (2 x 4 GB) DDR3-1333 ECC Unbuffered, CT51264BA1339.16FD |
| Hard Drive | Samsung MZ-5PA2560/000 256 GB SATA 3 Gb/s SSD |
| Graphics | Intel HD Graphics P3000 |
| Intel HD Graphics 3000 | |
| Nvidia Quadro FX 580 | |
| Power Supply | Seasonic X760 760 W 80 PLUS Gold PSU |
| System Software And Drivers | |
| Operating System | Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit |
| DirectX | DirectX 11 |
| Graphics Driver | Intel Driver: 8.15.10.2345 |
| Nvidia Driver: 270.61 | |
Benchmarks and Settings | |
|---|---|
Video Encoding | |
MainConcept 2.0 | Version: 2.0.0.1555 |
| HandBrake 0.9.4 | Version 0.9.4, convert first .vob file from The Last Samurai to .mp4, High Profile |
Applications | |
| WinRAR | Version 4.0 RAR, Syntax "winrar a -r -m3", Benchmark: 2010-THG-Workload |
| Visual Studio 2010 | Miranda IM Compile |
| Blender | Version: 2.54 beta Syntax blender -b thg.blend -f 1, Resolution: 1920x1080, Anti-Aliasing: 8x, Render: THG.blend frame 1 |
| ABBYY FineReader | Version: 10 Professional Build (10.0.102.82) Read PDF save to Doc, Source: Political Economy (J. Broadhurst 1842) 111 Pages |
Adobe After Effects | CS5 10.0.2; Custom Workload, SD project with three picture-in-picture frames, source video at 720p |
Adobe Photoshop | CS5 12.0.3; Custom Workload, Radial Blur, Shape Blur, Median, Polar Coordinates filters |
Adobe Premiere Pro | CS5 5.0.3; Paladin Workload |
| e-on Software Vue 8 PLE | 1920x1080 landscape render, Global Illumination enabled |
| Euler3D | CFD simulation over NACA 445.6 aeroelastic test wing at Mach .5 |
| Autodesk MatchMover 2011 | Custom workload, 720p camera footage tracked in 3D space |
Synthetic Benchmarks and Settings | |
| SPECapc 3ds Max 9 | Default Run, Hardware Shaders, Graphics, and CPU Render scores |
SPECapc LightWave 9.6 | LightWave 3D Discovery Edition, Render and MT benchmark scores |
SPECviewperf 10 | Multi-threaded x64 (four-threads); Workloads: 3ds Max, CATIA, Maya, Pro/E, SolidWorks, Teamcenter Visualization Mockup |
| Cinebench 11.5 | CPU and GPU tests, Built-in benchmark |
- Intel's Xeon E3 Processors Look Familiar
- Intel’s Xeon E3-1200-Series Family
- Platforms: The C200 Chipsets
- Graphics: Meet HD Graphics P3000
- Test Setup And Benchmarks
- Benchmark Results: SPECapc And SPECopc Testing
- Benchmark Results: Adobe CS5 Suite
- Benchmark Results: Media
- Benchmark Results: Rendering
- Benchmark Results: Productivity
- Power Consumption
- Conclusion
Sandy Bridge-E, LGA 2011 X79, Q4 2011.
I've worked with many small businesses, and every one that used a desktop chip for a server or a discount chip (Celeron, Duron, etc) for their desktop computers all performed very poorly. Some seemed to hang on by the sheer will of the owner, and in a couple cases, when the owner got sick for more than a week, the businesses folded like lawn chairs.
I've also seen an Engineering shop of ~30 engineers invest nicely into a real server and real workstations, and had me set up their entire network with SBS. their business ramped up so fast and well that they had to hire several more engineers and outgrew SBS (limited to 50 users at the time) within the next 2 years, and I had to go back and rebuild their domain with full enterprise level software, and add another server specifically for email. the owner said the investment in that SBS system was the best thing he'd invested in the business since he hired his first engineer.
Business owners who do not invest in their IT infrastructure fail at business. It's pretty plain and simple. While investing in good IT gear and software doesn't mean you'll ramp up your business to unheard of heights, it does give you a major leg up on the competition.
Thats a very bold statement, not all companies require top of the range computer equipment
I think you're wrong. I spend most of my day at work making and compiling code. For me the HD graphics work really well and getting anything more powerful than that, as evidenced from the tests, would be a waste of money. I also don't think I'm in the 10% group.
Are you going to do a follow-up to compare to current Xeons?
how many folks compile codes the size of which require a Xeon? im pretty sure your in the 10% group, IMHO for the majority of cases if your not pairing the Xeon with a discreet GFX card then chances are Xeon would be overkill
Geek,
Intel says the Xeons support Quick Sync (at least that's the case on the ark.intel.com site). However, I suspect that current apps do not recognize the Xeons, and consequently cannot yet take advantage of the hardware. Perhaps it'll be enabled in upcoming app revisions. Until then, I still recommend the desktop CPUs if Quick Sync is important to you.
Chris
Then the market will get more interesting, to be sure! We still need to see them do this on the desktop, though. I'd be surprised if they didn't end up releasing a FirePro-branded integrated solution at some point!
You're very welcome Huron, and thanks for the feedback.
Which Xeons would you like to see compared? And in which workloads? I'm happy to field ideas on this if it's something you can use!
Best,
Chris
LGA1155
LGA1156
LGA1366
LGA2011
LGA1356