Six AI data centers proposed for a small town of 7,000, equal to 51 Walmart Supercenters in 17 square mile area — four out of the seven town council members have resigned from their positions as town fights back

The residents of a small town in Pennsylvania are currently amid a fight for their community, as data center developers have applied for permits to build six campuses within the area. The proposed data centers will be built in the town of Archbald, which has a population of just 7,000 people, and will include 51 data warehouses. The Washington Post reports that each of these data warehouses will be about the size of a Walmart Supercenter, all of which would encompass about 14% of the town’s 17-square-mile area. The Archbald town council approved zoning changes that allowed data centers back in 2023, but some of the people in the town of 7,000 have started pushing back on these developments when they started applying for permits in 2025.

Archbald used to be at the epicenter of coal mining and transportation in the area. However, it has since turned into a quiet town with the decline of the coal industry in the early 1900s, which is why many were surprised by the developers’ interest in putting up data centers in the area.

But because a main power line cuts directly through the town, data centers would have easier access to the power they need without needing to invest significantly in grid infrastructure. The 500-kV Susquehanna-Roseland power line connects the 2.5-gigawatt Susquehanna nuclear power plant to New Jersey and goes directly over Archbald. When paired with the abundant land and fresh water available in the area, it just made sense for AI hyperscalers to build their infrastructure where the resources they need are readily available.

Latest Videos From

The community is passionately pushing back against these developments, though. Many are concerned about the effects of these sites on local utilities, as well as their potential for noise and light pollution. Communities neighboring data centers have started complaining of higher electricity rates and reduced power quality, and it has gotten to the point that President Donald Trump personally asked hyperscalers to promise that they’ll take steps to address the issue via the “ratepayer protection pledge.” Nevertheless, it seems that these commitments aren’t enough, as many local governments have started pushing back on these projects, resulting in delays costing billions of dollars.

The community’s fight against data centers in Archbald has gotten so heated to the point that four out of the seven town council members have resigned from their positions, alongside several planning board members. Some of the former councilors said that they resigned because the attacks have started going personal, especially on social media, and also cited the shooting of an Indiana politician’s home over another data center fight.

While the developers and the town government are grappling over permits, one project took advantage of a loophole and started cutting trees on their property. While this was a legal move, newly elected Archbald town council member Larry West stated that it revealed the town’s dirty past, which, according to The Washington Post, took decades for the coal dust to clear. “Now, it’s happening again, but this time, it’s data centers,” West said.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Jowi Morales
Contributing Writer

Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.

  • SkyBill40
    The sentiment is abundantly clear: People DO NOT WANT THESE in their communities. What will it take to get that message across to the town and city councils who keep approving zoning permits? I mean... someone's front door got shot up over it. Dare we wait to see what comes next?
    Reply
  • bigdragon
    Local representatives need to remember that a bigger town budget is not necessarily what the people living there want. I don't want more revenue coming into my community if it means higher utility prices, the constant droning noise of cooling systems, and zero local quality of life improvement. Nearly all of these data center situations are the result of local reps fixating on the bigger revenue numbers and thinking they can buy their way out of the negative impacts. I'm glad to see people increasingly push back.

    In my region there's rumor of another amusement park (Kings Dominion) getting sold off to developers who want to put in data centers. The park's electrical infrastructure, water infrastructure, and low land values make it an ideal place for data centers. The park is an essential entertainment destination for people who like thrill rides, but the local reps seem to have no clue that people who like thrill rides don't necessarily like the "alternatives" in the region (mostly sports). Again though, local officials just see "bigger number better" for revenue and don't care about how locals are affected until people push back.
    Reply
  • rluker5
    51 data warehouses the size of Walmart supercenters?
    Does all of the data in the world take up that much space?
    Reply
  • SkyBill40
    There's a huge data center complex that's mostly finished but still expanding near me run by Cyrus One. Thankfully, it's not that close to my residence but it is surrounded by large neighborhoods and the residents have complained a ton about noise and what not. The problem is, once it's in, it's in and there's no getting it out. The city is looking at revenue generation and has been using up what used to mostly be farmland and shifting to residential and dense commercial. There's hardly any land left seeing we butt against a large reservation and they have no interest (at this point, anyway) in having data centers built on their land. Time will tell as to what they do, but I personally don't see it due to a lack of resource infrastructure.

    Intel also has a massive footprint in the area as well, fully surrounded by residential that's encroached over time.
    Reply
  • WINTERLORD
    Didnt know theres already been attacks on lives over these ai centers but You know I could really see those hard-core climate change people doing bad things over these data centers nothing suprises me
    Reply
  • Notton
    took advantage of a loophole
    "Rules for thee, not for me"

    Those loopholes only happen because some big corporation has a ton of money to pay a team of lobbyists to put it in law, and a team of lawyers to exploit previously existing ones.

    It's designed so that no normie can ever exploit it without intricate knowledge of the law.
    Reply
  • IntelUser2000
    WINTERLORD said:
    Didnt know theres already been attacks on lives over these ai centers but You know I could really see those hard-core climate change people doing bad things over these data centers nothing suprises me
    You know the ones pushing the datacenters were the same pushing the whole climate change narrative right?
    Reply
  • SmokyBarnable
    Is rabid capitalist a resume requirement for town councils now?
    Reply
  • bill001g
    SmokyBarnable said:
    Is rabid capitalist a resume requirement for town councils now?
    Just low level politicians. They want more money to spend. They look at tax revenue from the data centers....assuming they have not given them tax breaks to build...as more money. Even if these data centers would cut the home owner property tax to zero the people living in the house would still pay more total including the electric bill. It lets the politicians pretend to be local heroes where they claim to have reduced taxes. Kinda like the people who think nuclear energy is "clean" because it does not emit CO2.
    Reply
  • DS426
    When paired with the abundant land and fresh water available in the area, it just made sense for AI hyperscalers to build their infrastructure where the resources they need are readily available.
    That's all it takes for it to make sense? Not also community support and more of an urban area that has the amenities and such that folks in these jobs tend to desire?

    Some small towns appreciate the growth prospects while many don't. KYC! (Know Your Community)
    Reply