TP-Link seeks to secure conditional approval from FCC following router import ban — company stresses it is no longer Chinese-owned

TP Link
(Image credit: Getty Images / NurPhoto)

TP-Link, one of the more popular consumer networking brands in the U.S., is currently engaged in discussions with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in a bid to secure a conditional approval to continue introducing new models after the FCC’s blanket ban on imported routers, PCMag reports. According to documents the company filed with the agency, TP-Link argued that it is a U.S. company with a 20% share of the consumer retail market. Furthermore, it said that “TP-Links routers are very positively reviewed by technology reviewers” and that “TP-Link routers are safe and secure.” The company was previously owned by TP-Link Technologies Co., which was based in Shenzhen, China, but it has since separated from its parent in 2022, with the company saying that it’s now an independent entity based in the U.S.

The U.S. government initially wanted to ban TP-Link because of national security concerns, especially with the company’s close ties to China. However, the FCC instead settled for a blanket ban on all imported consumer routers, except for those that can secure a conditional approval. This exemption would allow router manufacturers to continue importing routers until a specific date, provided that they get the nod from either the Department of War or the Department of Homeland Security.

One of the prerequisites to getting approval is for the applicant to show “a detailed, time-bound plan to establish or expand manufacturing in the United States for the router for which the applicant is seeing Conditional Approval in order the that device to qualify for FCC authorization” and “a description of committed and planned capital expenditures, financing, or other investments dedicated to U.S.-based manufacturing and assembly over the next 1-5 years, including expected timelines and milestones.”

Latest Videos From

There have been questions about the latter’s approvals, especially because it did not publicly release any documents proving that it was bringing back manufacturing capabilities onshore. Despite that, Netgear said in its SEC disclosure, “So long as the conditional approval is maintained, NETGEAR can launch new consumer routers and update the software on existing consumer routers indefinitely.”

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

TOPICS
Jowi Morales
Contributing Writer

Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.

  • toffty
    IDK, I have a feeling TP-Link is one of the reasons this regulation was put in place (if there _was_ actually an issue). I also am not naive enough to think it's one of Trump's stupid ideas.

    Personally, I used to have TP-Link everything but their UI sucks and I just never felt like it went far enough. I've since switched router, switches, and wifi to unifi and that ecosystem is so far superior for my use case.
    Reply
  • TechieTwo
    Yes TP-Link is one of many very insecure brands. If you check any reputable router security website you'll find that all popular consumer brands of modems/routers are woefully insecure and that the documented security issues go a long time if they are ever corrected.
    Reply
  • JamesJones44
    TP-Link is a shell company based in the US. There fixed it for them.
    Reply
  • SmokyBarnable
    “Conditional approval” is mainly a pathway for bribery and connections.
    Reply
  • dynamicreflect
    Banned import, so they can manufacture without worries.
    Reply