FCC bans import of new consumer routers not made in the US over security threat — agency says foreign-made devices pose ‘unacceptable risk’ to US persons
This could affect nearly every major router brand
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC), which certifies every radio-emitting device (including routers) in the U.S., has announced “the addition of routers produced in a foreign country to the Covered List,” which is composed of equipment and services that “pose an unacceptable risk to the national security of the United States or the security and safety of United States persons.” While this is not technically a blanket ban on the sale of imported routers in the U.S., the FCC Public Notice (PDF) effectively has the same impact: The agency says it will not certify a foreign-made consumer router, making it illegal to sell or even import future new models into the country.
The agency said it’s doing this in response to a National Security Determination earlier this month, which says: “Recently, malicious state and non-state sponsored cyber attackers have increasingly leveraged the vulnerabilities in small and home office routers produced abroad to carry out direct attacks against American civilians in their homes. From disrupting network connectivity to enabling local networking espionage and intellectual property theft, foreign-produced routers present unacceptable risks to Americans.”
It also blamed foreign-made routers for the Volt, Flax, and Salt Typhoon cyberattacks that hit critical American infrastructure, adding that “routers in the United States must have trusted supply chains so we are not providing foreign actors with a built-in backdoor to American homes, businesses, critical infrastructure, and emergency services.”
While this might match the context of increasing instability in global geopolitics, it does not specifically address the weakness found in many consumer Wi-Fi routers. Although TP-Link was widely used in recent cyberattacks, cybersecurity experts told CNET that this was because of its ubiquity in the market, and that the exploited vulnerabilities were also present on routers made by American companies. In fact, the U.S. government itself said that the Salt Typhoon attacks often targeted Cisco hardware. Still, this did not deter the Department of Commerce from investigating TP-Link over its close ties to China.
This isn’t the first time that the FCC issued a directive that had a blanket effect on a specific type of device. In late December 2025, the agency made a similar move on foreign-made drones, effectively banning DJI and other imported brands from registering new models in the U.S. Many of the best Wi-Fi routers on sale in 2026 are from foreign companies like TP-Link. The FCC's new measure could, in theory, preclude future new products from these companies from coming to the States.
Nevertheless, this does not mean that foreign router manufacturers will forever be excluded from the U.S. market. The FCC says (PDF) that affected brands can apply for a “Conditional Approval” from the Department of War or the Department of Homeland Security to exempt them from the Covered List before they can build “trusted manufacturing capacity in the United States.” The move also does not affect any routers already on sale in the United States, or indeed any routers previously purchased, which will continue to work as normal.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.

Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.
-
-Fran- LOL.Reply
There's not much else I can say or comment on, really.
The lolcow of policies, for sure.
Regards. -
Jeremy Kaplan Reports say the CEO of TP-Link is going to pay $1M for the Trump gold citizenship card. Probably unrelated ... right?Reply -
jp7189 Fortigate is US based, but manufactured overseas primarily in China/Taiwan. Where do they fall in this? They were utterly pwned by Volt for 5 years before they noticed it. As far as i can tell it was due to software defects and not due to hardware. Banning hardware doesn't fix incompetent software devs.Reply -
bloodroses Remember, this is the same government that wants to ban VPNs and require age verification for your OS. Who's to say they won't implement simiar into the routers themselves. Can we say nanny state?Reply -
TechieTwo The sad reality is most people don't even know enough to change the default password on their modem and router. That's why so many are compromised and used for attack bots in addition to exposing everything on your PC. :mad:Reply
A properly configured router can also prevent your router and other hardware from calling a nefarious third world country. -
coolitic I think a good solution would be to set some standards and regulations that hold router companies liable if a readily-exploitable vulnerability was used to compromise their routers, like for botnets for instance.Reply -
TechieTwo Reply
Unfortunately companies are not held accountable for any security defects - even when they are fully aware of them. See Windows/Microsoft as a good example. Much of the hardware OSs are totally insecure and even when the hardware mfgs. are notified they take their time to correct the security risks. Some companies just EOL the product so they don't need to provide any support.coolitic said:I think a good solution would be to set some standards and regulations that hold router companies liable if a readily-exploitable vulnerability was used to compromise their routers, like for botnets for instance.
It's disgraceful, IMNHO. :angry:
THIS is why people should take modem/router security more seriously:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/over-14-000-routers-were-hijacked-in-malicious-global-cyberattack/ar-AA1Zhxkr?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=69c2a78ae25540889d2465461625eee6&ei=120 -
thestryker As far as I'm aware there are no consumer routers built in the US. Vietnam seems to be the current hub for the majority of consumer routers.Reply
All of the exploits are also software based, even if it's a hard coded flaw, so this restriction wouldn't help there in the first place. -
TechieTwo Reply
The key here might be the term: "consumer grade" as there are more Biz oriented rounters that are likely more secure. I'm sure the better routers/companies will seek a proper Conditional Approval. As has been demonstrated many times "consumer grade" routers ARE extremely insecure regardless of brand. Wi-Fi routers are the worse. It doesn't matter the brand they are all bad based on testing and reported security defects.thestryker said:As far as I'm aware there are no consumer routers built in the US. Vietnam seems to be the current hub for the majority of consumer routers.
All of the exploits are also software based, even if it's a hard coded flaw, so this restriction wouldn't help there in the first place.