FCC reverses course, allows software updates for foreign-made drones and routers until 2029 — agency says blocking security patches could create cybersecurity risks

Router
(Image credit: Shutterstock)

The Federal Communications Commission announced on Friday, May 8, through its Office of Engineering and Technology (OET), that it was extending temporary waivers allowing certain foreign-produced drones, drone components, and consumer routers to continue receiving software and firmware updates in the United States.

In late 2025 and early 2026, the FCC added these categories of equipment to its “Covered List,” which effectively blocked already-authorized devices from receiving post-approval software and firmware modifications. The agency subsequently issued waivers permitting critical security and functionality updates to continue through January 1, 2027, for drones and drone components, and through March 1, 2027, for consumer routers.

Latest Videos From

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Etiido Uko
News Contributor

Etiido Uko is a news contributor for Tom's Hardware covering the latest updates in big tech and the PC industry. He is a mechanical engineer and senior technical writer with over nine years of experience in documentation and reporting. He is deeply passionate about all things engineering and technology, and is an expert in gadgets, manufacturing, robotics, automotive, and aerospace.

  • Cyber_Akuma
    Call me a conspiracy theorist, but I have a huge conscern that they made them agree to put backdoors in their updates as part of this sudden "change of heart" to suddenly allow firmware updates for the next three years.
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    Cyber_Akuma said:
    Call me a conspiracy theorist, but I have a huge conscern that they made them agree to put backdoors in their updates as part of this sudden "change of heart" to suddenly allow firmware updates for the next three years.
    They don't have to.

    Part of the original functionality is a log of when, where, how high, and for how long.
    They just need to get that from the mothership.

    I have a log in my HolyStone app that shows all that, going back 3+ years.
    Reply
  • Skwerlo
    T.A.C.O.
    Reply
  • hwertz
    This is so dumb. So OK you aren't allowing new models from these vendors (which is a whole 'nother kettle of fish.) But how does barring software updates on already deployed hardware benefit anyone? At least they've extended it (probably extended enough, since Netgear, D-Link, etc. aren't exactly known for providing many years of updates anyway.)
    Reply
  • John Kiser
    hwertz said:
    This is so dumb. So OK you aren't allowing new models from these vendors (which is a whole 'nother kettle of fish.) But how does barring software updates on already deployed hardware benefit anyone? At least they've extended it (probably extended enough, since Netgear, D-Link, etc. aren't exactly known for providing many years of updates anyway.)
    The FCC is currently full on idiocy. We don't have the domestic production and it is easy enough to monitor network traffic for telse that know what they are doing to tell if something is good or bad.
    Reply
  • saunupe1911
    This is confusing. So basically don't buy any router at this point?
    Reply
  • phead128
    Is this the same FCC that tried to ban Jimmy Kimmel because they don't like his jokes?

    Is this the same FCC that removed Net Neutrality because Internet giants lobbying?

    Is this the same FCC that banned foreign made routers and giving Netgear a solo monopoly as of that makes things more "secure"? Who is to say Netgear isn't giving backdoors to NSA in return for monopoly?

    Is this the same FCC that banned new models of foreign drones because of "muh national security" when there is no evidence of national security issues?

    FCC is run by a bunch of incompetents that exceed even Kash Patel's or Pete Kegsbreath' level drunkard incompetency.
    Reply
  • daftshadow
    Surveillance state... the US is becoming.
    Reply