Bummer: Dead Space 3 PC Will Be Direct Console Port

47

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Kevin Parrish
Contributor

Kevin Parrish has over a decade of experience as a writer, editor, and product tester. His work focused on computer hardware, networking equipment, smartphones, tablets, gaming consoles, and other internet-connected devices. His work has appeared in Tom's Hardware, Tom's Guide, Maximum PC, Digital Trends, Android Authority, How-To Geek, Lifewire, and others.

  • Pinhedd
    I will never understand why someone would pay good money for a game, and then pay more money to not play it.
    Reply
  • edogawa
    EA has failed us once again. They should be out of the game, not THQ.
    Reply
  • A Bad Day
    Nvidia GeForce 6800 or better
    ATI X1600 Pro or better

    :(

    2.8 GHz processor or equivalent

    Pentium 4? Core 2 Duo? Nehalem? Sandy? Bulldozer?
    Reply
  • fuzzion
    Micro-transactions killed it for me.
    Reply
  • ShadyHamster
    A Bad DayPentium 4? Core 2 Duo? Nehalem? Sandy? Bulldozer?
    2.8Ghz P4
    1.6Ghz Sandy.
    Everything else in between.
    Reply
  • manofchalk
    I fear for Dead Space 3. The first was amazing, the second was decent but had too much action, not enough horror.
    What I'm seeing of Dead Space 3 isn't good. Co-Op and micro-transactions in a horror game, that will be very difficult to pull off I think.
    Reply
  • alidan
    edogawaEA has failed us once again. They should be out of the game, not THQ.EA for as much as I hate them they happen have great management, THQ failed in management from almost all levels of the company, and it was only a godsend that they had some great games that help them keep afloat as long as they did.

    Thankfully EA hasn't purchased any of the THQ's good properties.

    With how bad the PC ports of darksiders were however I wouldn't mind if they got that developer.

    manofchalkI fear for Dead Space 3. The first was amazing, the second was decent but had too much action, not enough horror. What I'm seeing of Dead Space 3 isn't good. Co-Op and micro-transactions in a horror game, that will be very difficult to pull off I think.I watched a bit of the demo, I don't see a whole lot that I actually like in this game. It really does feel like the difference between resident evil 4 and resident evil 5.

    That's not to say that the game was bad, just that completely betrayed its roots. Five is no longer scary in the least, and even when they tried they failed that it. And don't even get me started on six great action game but horrible resident evil game.

    That's kind of the way I feel about dead space three, great action game but horrible dead space game.
    Reply
  • baddad
    A port that's nothing special makes it one less game I will buy.
    Reply
  • memadmax
    "Pentium 4? Core 2 Duo? Nehalem? Sandy? Bulldozer?"

    Doesn't matter.
    I haven't ran into a game that was picky on what kind of CPU it was running on since FreeSpace...
    Reply
  • dark_knight33
    Did anyone here play DS1 for PC? The damned controls were terrible. It was clear that they did a half-assed, bottom dollar PC port just to sucker those dollars out of people's hands. For that reason alone I've never played DS2.

    Why would I pay EA to cheat and get materials when I can use cheat engine for free if I so desired?

    The real tragedy is now players will assume cheating is necessary because EA will have intentionally upped the rarity of those items to encourage you to pay.

    I will reward EA's new single player micro-transaction & full price game by just not buying it, won't even feel bad about it. There's so many great games out there these days, I just don't have time to play them all anyway. Currently playing Legend of Grimrock from the humble indie bundle. No watered down, half done features, no online DRM, and no 2nd class (cuz it's not on a console) gaming experience. EA can suck it.
    Reply