XSPC Fury X Water Block Now In Production

5

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Contributor

Kevin Carbotte is a contributing writer for Tom's Hardware who primarily covers VR and AR hardware. He has been writing for us for more than four years.

  • WFang
    now, how soon before we can get some of these compared to stock along with over-clockability? early reports are somewhat discouraging, pending new firmware to allow tweaks/OC, and also wondering how much cooling performance gains, if any, a 3rd party water block would give?
    Reply
  • Blaise170
    There are already reports of unofficial overclocks, including both core and memory. Info here: http://www.overclock.net/t/1562593/hardware-info-hbm-on-furyx-can-be-overclocked-after-all/0_20
    Reply
  • falchard
    Honestly, I really don't want to get into the Fury X. The GPUs really need to move on to a new die size already. I think over-clocking a matured process node where every bit has already been squeezed out of these cards to be unproductive. I thought the R9 290X was on this process node for too long, The Fury X is pretty much the same thing with more efficient memory.
    Reply
  • Tanquen
    The smallest block a video cards needed in how long and it's still $130.
    Reply
  • cats_Paw
    Honestly, I really don't want to get into the Fury X. The GPUs really need to move on to a new die size already. I think over-clocking a matured process node where every bit has already been squeezed out of these cards to be unproductive. I thought the R9 290X was on this process node for too long, The Fury X is pretty much the same thing with more efficient memory.

    Safe to say that you are correct. Same with CPUs really, we have been getting very low increases in performance.
    Reply