Intel says 'something has to give' with memory prices — company says it 'will continue to make sure that there are products which can take care of older memory technologies'
It’s not a firm commitment, but Intel is aware of the importance of Raptor Lake and DDR4.
Intel recognizes the memory squeeze that’s been a plague on the PC market for the past several months. While highlighting options like Wildcat Lake and older Raptor Lake options, Intel’s Nish Neelalojanan, senior director of product management for Intel’s Client Computing Group, sat down with Tom’s Hardware at Computex 2026 to discuss the company’s outlook on the computing market, ranging from Nvidia’s recent RTX Spark announcement to ongoing memory shortages, saying “something has to give” with the latter.
“Longer term, I think something has to give, right? The over-inflation, we will have to keep an eye out,” Neelalojanan told me. “But if I could predict the memory market, I would be rich in stock.”
I asked Neelalojanan more specifically if Intel was planning around memory shortages and making any adjustments to its strategy going forward. And the answer, surprisingly, is yes, though not in the way you might expect. Neelalojanan pointed to Raptor Lake and Wildcat Lake as products that address memory shortages currently, and said that the company will continue to support products on older memory standards as long as it makes sense.
“We do have products that support DDR4 on both desktop and mobile. Raptor Lake, we’re not end-of-life-ing any of them; they’re there. We’ll continue to make sure that there are products which can take care of older memory technologies if they’re available and cheap,” Neelalojanan told me. “Second thing is, we are making sure we are validating lower configs [for Wildcat Lake] as well. Wildcat Lake starts at 8GB. Wildcat Lake is a single-channel product, so there are products which can leverage low memory and give reasonably good performance.”
Wildcat Lake, and entry-level laptop designs more broadly, have been a big focus of Computex. Presumably in response to the MacBook Neo, Intel, of course, has its Wildcat Lake options, but Qualcomm is targeting that market, as well, with its new Snapdragon C chips. AMD doesn’t have a product targeting this market of sub-$600 laptops quite yet, but we plan on asking the company about its plans this week at Computex.
We’ve seen a shift toward cheaper options on the desktop, as well. AMD just reintroduced the Ryzen 7 5800X3D and launched the Ryzen 7 7700X3D, two CPUs that use older architectures. Under normal circumstances, they’d be unamusing at best. Under current circumstances, they’re putting components into a market that’s begging for them.
“Large memory is completely overshadowing any CPU prices, right, memory and storage… CPU is not any more determining your system price point,” Neelalojanan said. “We are working with a lot of indigenous memory suppliers and validating them, so we’re doing everything we can… it’s not just one, two or three. If there are local-specific memory vendors, like in [China] and now Indonesia is even bringing up a couple of them. We’re trying to validate as much as we can so there’s enough choice that people can get pockets of relief.”
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Intel didn’t, however, say that it’s reintroducing any products along the lines of the Ryzen 7 5800X3D 10th Anniversary Edition. At the moment, it seems Intel is focused more on supporting DDR4-based options and keeping them on the market, at least until the memory squeeze loosens its grip.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Jake Roach is the Senior CPU Analyst at Tom’s Hardware, writing reviews, news, and features about the latest consumer and workstation processors.
-
Notton Intel: We recognize the importance of DDR4 platformsReply
Also Intel: Which is why we ditched DDR4 and LPDDR4 support on Wildcat Lake, and a bunch of other nice-to-have features that Alder Lake-N had. Please buy our old stock sitting in our warehouses. -
ezst036 Yeah something someone, someone else.Reply
Hey Intel, how about you give us a fab or two that makes DRAM?
Nah. Not Intel. Someone else.
And also they have abandoned all their "older" sockets which supported DDR4. Tick Tock has been stupid for years. Were the sockets actually older? Kinda not really. Intel just deemed them as old. Tick Tock has been stupid for years. -
usertests Reply
Is there a problem with old stock sitting in warehouses? They won't be sitting there for very long if production ends.Notton said:Intel: We recognize the importance of DDR4 platforms
Also Intel: Which is why we ditched DDR4 and LPDDR4 support on Wildcat Lake, and a bunch of other nice-to-have features that Alder Lake-N had. Please buy our old stock sitting in our warehouses.
Before the bad times, people advised against Alder Lake-N with the slower DDR4/LPDDR4 because of it being single-channel (maybe it doesn't matter all that much, I'd have to check). The situation has changed now that DDR5/LPDDR5 are luxuries.
Other than that, I don't know what nice-to-have features it has that Wildcat Lake doesn't, with the exception of 9x PCIe 3.0 lanes being a better choice than 6x PCIe 4.0 lanes for some products that could use more I/O flexibility, like NAS systems.
If Intel is phasing out production of Alder Lake-U to make more server chips on Intel 7, then that's a loss. Cheap Alder Lake-U laptops with empty DDR4 slots were the cheat code. Got a nice 8+32 GB system for around half of these Macbook Neo clone prices. -
Shiznizzle The 5800X3D is a non starter in the UK. The chip is a last gen CPU with a dead end and an extremely high cost of 550 pounds sterling on the cheapest platform there is, Amazon.Reply
For that price you might as well just buy the 32GB of DDR 5 and an Am5 motherboard and you would still save money. What were AMD thinking? -
usertests Reply
If you already have the AM4 board and DDR4, it could be the right move. The original 5800X3D has been sold for well above $350 on the used market.Shiznizzle said:The 5800X3D is a non starter in the UK. The chip is a last gen CPU with a dead end and an extremely high cost of 550 pounds sterling on the cheapest platform there is, Amazon.
For that price you might as well just buy the 32GB of DDR 5 and an Am5 motherboard and you would still save money. What were AMD thinking?
Is your £550 price an anomaly or expected?
On Newegg US, I see $230ish for 32 GB DDR4 new, vs. $380ish for 32 GB DDR5 new. The 7700X3D will outperform the 5800X3D for less money, but maybe the AM5 boards cost more. I could see someone going for the AM4 dead end to save a few bucks. -
palladin9479 ReplyShiznizzle said:The 5800X3D is a non starter in the UK. The chip is a last gen CPU with a dead end and an extremely high cost of 550 pounds sterling on the cheapest platform there is, Amazon.
For that price you might as well just buy the 32GB of DDR 5 and an Am5 motherboard and you would still save money. What were AMD thinking?
For starters this is heavily impacted by your local market, also the fact that very few are left in circulation. AMD has said they are going to make more of them so expect prices to become more normal.
As for the platform, that is a very consumerist way to go about buying things. "Here this thing is new, this thing is awesome, buy this new thing. Oh look next new thing, new thing better, consume next product". And keep repeating that wondering where all your money went.
Instead we define a set of requirements, not a set of products you want but a set of real requirements. Then buy / build the thing that meets those requirements. Keep that thing as long as they meet those requirements. If requirements change, then reevaluate and decide accordingly. The infinitely upgrading computer hasn't been an economically optimal option for over a decade now, ever since hardware vendors figured out they could use refresh cycles to maximize revenue extraction from consumer spending habits.
AM4 boards and DDR4 memory are cheaper then AM5 + DDR5. AMD 5700 / 5800X CPU's are also super cheap, it's only the 5800X3D that is outrageously priced due to low supply. I know of someone right now who has AM4 MB + 32GB DDR4 + 5600X + 9070XT and is wanting to buy a new 5800X3D when AMD rereleases it. -
thestryker Intel is likely going to keep pushing out RPL SKUs under the "Core Processor" branding for the next couple of years. The biggest question though is how much capacity is available since SRF/GNR/CWF IO Die and SPR/EMR are all manufactured on Intel 7.Reply
CPUs after RPL were never going to have any form of DDR4 support since when all those decisions were made there was no sign of the mempocalypse coming. Until 2025 everything looked business as usual for a generational DRAM shift: prices got lower and stabilized and the outgoing technology lowered production and got even cheaper.
During the current times I bet Intel wishes that Krzanich (or Swan) had spun up a fab for 3D XPoint production. Gelsinger may have been the one to officially kill Optane, but the economics wouldn't have made sense for tooling a fab by the time he was hired. -
Li Ken-un That the dead tech even made it to the point of being put into the spanking new E1.S form factor defied all odds. They’re possibly the best SSD-form factor Optanes ever made and had potential to be much more.Reply -
Notton Reply
Actually, yes, the 9x PCIe 3.0 lanes was very flexible without needing to go through a separate PCIe switch.usertests said:Is there a problem with old stock sitting in warehouses? They won't be sitting there for very long if production ends.
Before the bad times, people advised against Alder Lake-N with the slower DDR4/LPDDR4 because of it being single-channel (maybe it doesn't matter all that much, I'd have to check). The situation has changed now that DDR5/LPDDR5 are luxuries.
Other than that, I don't know what nice-to-have features it has that Wildcat Lake doesn't, with the exception of 9x PCIe 3.0 lanes being a better choice than 6x PCIe 4.0 lanes for some products that could use more I/O flexibility, like NAS systems.
If Intel is phasing out production of Alder Lake-U to make more server chips on Intel 7, then that's a loss. Cheap Alder Lake-U laptops with empty DDR4 slots were the cheat code. Got a nice 8+32 GB system for around half of these Macbook Neo clone prices.
There are a bunch of NVMe NAS based off of N100/N150 that don't use a PCIe switch, though they are typically 4 or 6 slots.
The 8 and 12 slots use switches and they're pricier than the 6-slot config.
Now you're forced to go through one if you want more than 4-slots.
As for RAM speed, it didn't matter much because, the CPU and poor heatsink implementation was the main bottleneck on quite a few of these N100/N150 PCs.