AMD clarifies commitment to support for RDNA 1 and 2-based GPUs — company backtracks on RX 7900 series USB-C functionality (Updated)

AMD RDNA 3 GPU Architecture Deep Dive
(Image credit: AMD)
Recent updates

Update - 11:45 am ET, October 31: In a statement of clarification to Tom's Hardware, AMD says that "New features, bug fixes and game optimizations will continue to be delivered as required by market needs in the maintenance mode branch" to its RDNA 1 and 2-based GPUs, following community pushback and some confusion regarding its recent decision to put the cards in 'maintenance mode'. AMD had previously stated cards would "continue to receive driver updates for critical security and bug fixes." Full story here. The rest of yesterday's story remains as published.

Yesterday, AMD released a new driver update for its GPUs that sent the community into a frenzy because of one major change: it put RDNA 1 and RDNA 2 GPUs under "maintenance" mode, removing them from the priority list that receives monthly game optimization updates. This came as a shock to many, considering RDNA 2, or RX 6000 series, is less than 4 years old and was hugely popular against the RTX 3000 series at that time. Without RDNA 2, AMD's position today as the value-oriented alternative to RTX cards wouldn't be as cemented, yet the company is leaving them behind.

Now, as noted by Hardware Unboxed, PC gaming handhelds could suddenly find themselves in a world of trouble. Mobile devices rely on proper optimization far more than desktop parts, and even though OEMs like Valve and Asus work with AMD to tune the silicon together, with AMD sunsetting RDNA 2 from its main driver branch, we could see new games start to fall apart on these devices.

Fresh releases rely on GPU driver optimizations to get the most out of the hardware from day one, and without AMD's drivers to back them up, RDNA-2-based handhelds, of which there are plenty, could essentially be rendered legacy hardware. It wouldn't make sense for the company to release specific updates for only its APUs (like the Ryzen Z1) but withhold those optimizations from the main driver releases for desktop and laptop SKUs. As far as we can tell right now, only third-party community support can be of assistance.

Valve is less affected by this fiasco since it uses the open-source RADV Vulkan drivers (for Linux), which the company optimizes itself without caring what AMD does on the Windows side. The real ramifications will be seen in something like the recently launched ROG Xbox Ally, which is powered by the Ryzen Z2A chip based on RDNA 2 architecture. We're talking about a brand new $600 device — nay, an "Xbox" — that might be out of support within a month of its launch. As far as console-like experiences go, that would certainly become one of the worst ones in history.

ROG Xbox Ally X running Bazzite

(Image credit: Cyber Dopamine on YouTube)

AMD still supports RDNA 1 and 2, but only for critical bug fixes and security updates, not new features — that luxury is reserved for RX 7000 and 9000 series now. Speaking of, as part of yesterday's update, AMD also disabled charging on the USB-C port on some RX 7900 series cards, a move the company has now confirmed was a mistake. The USB-C feature was not altered and remains operational just like before, with DisplayPort Alt mode and charging capability; not data transfer (which was never supported). In a statement to Tom's Hardware, AMD clarified:

"The release notes for AMD Software Adrenalin Edition 25.10.2 posted today included misinformation that has since been corrected. There is no change to USB-C functionality on the RX 7900 series GPUs in the 25.10.2 driver. There was an incorrect line in the originally posted release notes that has been removed, and the release notes have been updated."

Nvidia still supports its USB-C variant, Virtual Link, to this day, despite no GPUs since the RTX 20 series having the port. In fact, the company supported its Maxwell and Pascal graphics for roughly a decade, with the GTX 10-series being part of the day-one priority list all the way up until September of last year, a whole eight years after it first debuted. Perhaps that's what you can do when you're the richest company in the world. Contrast that to RDNA 1/2, and even with the RX 7000/9000 hierarchy in mind, the decision seems baffling.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Hassam Nasir
Contributing Writer

Hassam Nasir is a die-hard hardware enthusiast with years of experience as a tech editor and writer, focusing on detailed CPU comparisons and general hardware news. When he’s not working, you’ll find him bending tubes for his ever-evolving custom water-loop gaming rig or benchmarking the latest CPUs and GPUs just for fun.

  • -Fran-
    AMD really needs to come out and clarify this further.

    Typical AMD screw up.

    Regards.
    Reply
  • LordVile
    I doubt they’ll drop drivers for bespoke devices with large multinationals. Likely just the desktop parts
    Reply
  • hwertz
    Just put Linux on it. They have Vulkan support down to GCN1.0, fully supported, fully up to date, still receiving speedups, bug fixes, support for new Vulkan versions as they come out, with no plans to put it in some 'maintenance mode'. (And fully supported drivers going back about 20 years for Intel and AMD/ATI GPUs.)
    Reply
  • enb141
    I've been saying this for years, AMD support is crap, I got an 6400 a few years ago because getting an Nvidia back then was an impossible task.

    Back then I said that card had crappy drivers, nobody listened to me, now a few years later, time proved me right.
    Reply
  • edzieba
    LordVile said:
    I doubt they’ll drop drivers for bespoke devices with large multinationals. Likely just the desktop parts
    If they were willing to continue developing optimisations for the RDNA2 architecture, there'd be no reason to drop that for consumer cards but keep doing that work for OEM ones. It's a minimal additional overhead to the actual work, but with a big public relations backlash.
    hwertz said:
    Just put Linux on it. They have Vulkan support down to GCN1.0, fully supported, fully up to date, still receiving speedups, bug fixes, support for new Vulkan versions as they come out, with no plans to put it in some 'maintenance mode'. (And fully supported drivers going back about 20 years for Intel and AMD/ATI GPUs.)
    If the issue is lack of ongoing per-game optimisation, "switch to Linux" is an anti-solution. AMD aren't stopping bugfixes or security updates for older cards.
    Reply
  • Steelninja1977
    enb141 said:
    I've been saying this for years, AMD support is crap, I got an 6400 a few years ago because getting an Nvidia back then was an impossible task.

    Back then I said that card had crappy drivers, nobody listened to me, now a few years later, time proved me right.
    Dude that's just a crappy card. I had been with AMD 15 years right up till my Rx6800 and the drivers were great. Literally no issues. I moved to Nvidia and bought a 4080 super and had driver issues out the box. Nvidias main 4080 super drivers just didn't work. I had to go to the manufacturer website and get them. It's been fixed since then. But the 4080 super wasn't even a new card. I never had that issue with AMD. All I had with AMD was FTL drive in elite would drop to like 15 fps and it took them about a year to fix it. On my R9 390x back in the day. But that was game specific.
    Reply
  • LordVile
    edzieba said:
    If they were willing to continue developing optimisations for the RDNA2 architecture, there'd be no reason to drop that for consumer cards but keep doing that work for OEM ones. It's a minimal additional overhead to the actual work, but with a big public relations backlash.
    If the issue is lack of ongoing per-game optimisation, "switch to Linux" is an anti-solution. AMD aren't stopping bugfixes or security updates for older cards.
    They’ll have deals with AMD to keep it up to date or will provide the support themselves à la Valve.

    Linux is useless anyway for most people and isn’t user friendly unless you have a steamos type overlay. There’s a reason why the Linux crowd number in the dozens
    Reply
  • Ogotai
    hwertz said:
    Just put Linux on it.
    close minded thinking, once again. not every one can, or knows how to use linux, or what they use a pc for, may not be viable as its all windows based..

    sorry but " just switch/use linux * is not a good answer or alternative..
    Reply