AMD clarifies its clarifications on controversial RDNA 1 and 2 driver note — company will continue game optimization support after all

RX 6900 XT graphics card on a desk.
(Image credit: WolStame/Weibo)

After a turbulent weekend of updates and clarifications, AMD has published an entire web page to assuage user backlash and reaffirm its commitment to continued support for its RDNA 1 and RDNA 2-based drives, following a spate of confusion surrounding its recent decision to put Radeon RX 5000 and 6000 series cards in "maintenance mode." This comes after AMD had to deny that the RX 7900 cards were losing USB-C power supply moving forward, even though the drive changelog said something quite different.

Just last week, AMD released a new driver update for its graphics cards, and it went anything but smoothly. First, the wrong drivers were uploaded, and even after that was corrected, several glaring errors in the release notes required clarification. AMD was forced to correct claims about its RX 7900 cards, but at the time clarified that, indeed, RX 5000 and 6000 graphics cards were entering "Maintenance Mode," despite some RX 6000 cards being only around four years old.

Using the new split driver approach will reportedly make the job of AMD's driver team easier, whilst preventing anything designed for newer GPUs from breaking anything on the older ones.

"Our goal is simple: to give every Radeon gamer the best experience possible. By separating the code paths, our engineers can move faster with new features for RDNA 3 and RDNA 4, while keeping RDNA 1 and RDNA 2 stable and optimized for current and future games," AMD said.

This public statement backs up the response Tom's Hardware received from AMD at the tail end of last week.

"New features, bug fixes and game optimizations will continue to be delivered as required by market needs in the maintenance mode branch," an AMD spokesperson told Tom's Hardware last week.

This probably puts to bed any ideas of those older AMD cards getting the latest upscaling support, despite what modders have already proved is possible. AMD's early cards were notoriously and significantly behind the Nvidia curve when it came to upscaling and ray tracing support. With how much greater focus recent generations of AMD hardware and the latest games have placed on these technologies, perhaps it makes sense for AMD to keep its efforts for these new features focused on the future and recent past.

Either way, it's good to know that game optimizations will remain for those on older cards, even if they won't get quite the same shiny new features as the latest designs.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Jon Martindale
Freelance Writer

Jon Martindale is a contributing writer for Tom's Hardware. For the past 20 years, he's been writing about PC components, emerging technologies, and the latest software advances. His deep and broad journalistic experience gives him unique insights into the most exciting technology trends of today and tomorrow.

  • Makaveli
    Their marketing person could have worded it better for sure however the tech tubers and the rage bait all these guys caused over this was incredible.

    It seems none of them understands maintenance mode does not equal no driver support.

    But when I think about the viewers of those channels it make sense majority are just gamers and don't actually know anything about computers.
    Reply
  • DS426
    Makaveli said:
    Their marketing person could have worded it better for sure however the tech tubers and the rage bait all these guys caused over this was incredible.
    ...
    But when I think about the viewers of those channels it make sense majority are just gamers and don't actually know anything about computers.

    I'm sure it was ridiculous. I only have two that I trust and am subscribed to, but as you pointed out and I agree with, there's a big divide between pure gamers and gamers that are PC builders.
    Reply
  • DS426
    I appreciate AMD making these clarifications. It also makes sense to me that drivers would be forked at this point between RDNA 1+2 and 3+4.
    Reply
  • Makaveli
    DS426 said:
    I'm sure it was ridiculous. I only have two that I trust and am subscribed to, but as you pointed out and I agree with, there's a big divide between pure gamers and gamers that are PC builders.
    Yes sir

    I have it in 3 groups.

    1. Gamers this includes console players just want to game don't care about how anything works will by a pre built computer.
    2. PC enthusiastic / PC builders that also play games will never buy a prebuilt computer, understand and care about their machine and the little details and has some IT experience outside of games. (PCMR)
    3. Career IT / Corporate guy that is also #2 but with enterprise experience.

    Group one due to just a gaming focus will believe pretty much anything they are told in a youtube video.
    Group two is more technical are on forums these users also read articles are on THG, Anandtech, HardOCP etc. Will actually question stuff.
    Group three doesn't fall for the stuff group 1 does due to do experience and is similar to group 2 but also lacks the time to forum crawl like group 2 because of work family etc.

    Group 2&3 easy to get along due to having more technical interest and the ability to read between the lines. And usually being adults. While group 1 does have adults its also alot of chidren.
    Reply