Bernie Sanders calls for halt on AI data center construction — wants to ensure that the technology benefits ‘all of us, not just the 1%’

Bernie Sanders
(Image credit: Getty / Andres Kudacki)

U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said that he will push for a moratorium on the construction of AI data centers to ensure that the technology will be useful for the greatest number of Americans and not just the few multi-billionaires who are advocating for the widespread use of artificial intelligence. According to the senator’s X post, this delay “will give democracy a chance to catch up, and ensure that the benefits of technology work for all of us, not just the 1%.” Sanders raised three points in his short video: ‘Who is aggressively pushing AI?’; ‘What will AI and robotics mean economically for the working class of this country?’; and ‘Millions of kids in this country are becoming more and more isolated from real human relationships and are getting their emotional support from AI.’

There have also been concerns about AI replacing people in the workforce. While this hasn’t resulted in widespread layoffs yet, MIT estimates that AI could replace up to 11.7% of American workers across industries, not just in tech. Even Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei said that the widespread use of this technology could result in up to 20% unemployment within the next five years, with Ford CEO Jim Farley warning that it will wipe out nearly half of all entry-level white-collar jobs.

Sanders also raised concerns about children using AI for companionship instead of building relationships with other people. “Think for a moment about a future when human beings are not interacting with each other and are spending virtually all of their time with devices instead of people,” Sanders said. “Is that the kind of future you want? Well, not me.”

The senator from Vermont wants to halt all progress on AI data center construction to address these issues first. He also isn’t the only one concerned about the possible negative impacts of artificial intelligence on society, as Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and two other Democrat senators recently sent letters recently to several big tech companies asking them to explain how their AI data centers are impacting residential energy bills. These moves directly contradict the current administration’s goal of turning the U.S. into an AI powerhouse, with Trump signing an executive order for the so-called ‘Genesis Mission’ — an initiative to drive AI development across the country — and is even comparing its scale with the Manhattan Project.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Jowi Morales
Contributing Writer

Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.

  • Math Geek
    That's so cute. He thinks anything at all happens that isn't specifically designed to benefit the 1% and only the 1%
    Reply
  • -Fran-
    Good luck, Bernie. The only real remaining politician trying to look for the common citizen in the USA.

    I doubt you'll manage to move anyone getting their pockets fill with this frenzy, but my sincere best wishes nonetheless.

    Regards.
    Reply
  • hotaru251
    ai rush is for 2 fields: Military & business.

    Military is obvious reasons & business is to not hire humans and have to deal w/ stuff like breaks, 401k, bonus, etc etc.
    If they had no effect on either of those the tech wouldnt of ever boomed in 1st place.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    hotaru251 said:
    ai rush is for 2 fields: Military & business.
    Sure, they both want it, but military is not funding most of the expansion. If you just look at the military budget, there's not a ton of room in it for new AI spending. Most of it is going to the same stuff as before.

    hotaru251 said:
    business is to not hire humans and have to deal w/ stuff like breaks, 401k, bonus, etc etc.
    I'm sure many business execs see this as the endgame, but I think the carrot most are chasing right now is just using it to fuel growth.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    -Fran- said:
    Good luck, Bernie. The only real remaining politician trying to look for the common citizen in the USA.
    I wouldn't say that others don't care. It's a valid question how many feel they have room to act, however.

    In case you missed it, there was just another article about others raising many of the same concerns that Bernie is talking about:
    https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intelligence/elizabeth-warren-other-u-s-senators-concerned-about-big-tech-pushing-up-electricity-costs-demands-explanation-from-amazon-google-meta-as-ai-data-centers-drive-up-residential-energy-bills
    Reply
  • kennethrc
    Or, if you can read past the fnords, "I want more DCs in VT!"
    Reply
  • LordVile
    bit_user said:
    Sure, they both want it, but military is not funding most of the expansion. If you just look at the military budget, there's not a ton of room in it for new AI spending. Most of it is going to the same stuff as before.


    I'm sure many business execs see this as the endgame, but I think the carrot most are chasing right now is just using it to fuel growth.
    Military won’t touch it until it’s more mature. Can’t have an AI system launching a missile and kicking off a war now can we. I’d say you don’t want blue on blue but America doesn’t seem to care too much about that
    Reply
  • Nick_C
    bit_user said:
    I'm sure many business execs see this as the endgame, but I think the carrot most are chasing right now is just using it to fuel growth.
    The problem with that is that if there are no workers then there are no customers (for things other than the absolute basics that can be afforded on welfare) - other than those who own the companies employing no-one.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Nick_C said:
    The problem with that is that if there are no workers then there are no customers (for things other than the absolute basics that can be afforded on welfare) - other than those who own the companies employing no-one.
    Have you heard the expression: "race to the bottom" ? I can certainly imagine a scenario where they feel locked into a race they might actually want nobody to win. It's just that their competitors winning would be even worse for them than if they won.

    LordVile said:
    Military won’t touch it until it’s more mature.
    Military will touch it for the same reason as the corporates: however bad it is, it'd be worse if the enemy did it first.

    To me, an AI fighter pilot seems inevitable. It won't be long before humans would be dead meat in any dogfight, due to slower reaction times and less G-force tolerance. Remote piloting is too easily subject to jamming. The only answer is AI.
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    LordVile said:
    Military won’t touch it until it’s more mature. Can’t have an AI system launching a missile and kicking off a war now can we. I’d say you don’t want blue on blue but America doesn’t seem to care too much about that
    "The War Department Unleashes AI on New GenAI.mil Platform "

    https://www.war.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/4354916/the-war-department-unleashes-ai-on-new-genaimil-platform/
    Reply