System Builder Marathon, Q1 2013: System Value Compared
Hardware, Software, And Overclock Settings
Today's chart shows the stock and overclocked settings for each system, but it doesn’t show the baseline memory differences between our $800 and $1,000 PCs. Both systems use RAM that’s rated at DDR3-1600, but defaults to DDR3-1333, relying on Intel Extreme Memory Profiles (XMP) to reach its full ratings. Since XMP is an overclocking technology, Don chose DDR3-1333 as his baseline. Since XMP is a default overclock, I used that as my baseline. Don then “overclocked” his 1.35 V RAM to its 1.50 V secondary XMP profile, while I shot straight for 1.60 V and far-higher data rates. History will dictate whether 1.60 V is too much for this 1.35 V kit over the long term.
The $600 PC starts off with 1.5 V RAM, so Paul's 1.6 V overclock settings is comparatively less aggressive. His higher bandwidth is ready to give the $800 machine a run for its money in a few of our applications, even though the machine is limited to half the capacity.
Test Hardware Configurations | |||
---|---|---|---|
Row 0 - Cell 0 | $600 Gaming PC | $800 Enthusiast PC | $1000 Peformance PC |
Processor (Overclock) | Intel Core i5-3350P 3.10 GHz, Four Physical CoresO/C to 3.70 GHz | Intel Core i5-3570K 3.40 GHz, Four Physical CoresO/C to 4.40 GHz, +0.085 V | Intel Core i5-3570K 3.40 GHz, Four Physical CoresO/C to 4.40 GHz, 1.28 V |
Graphics (Overclock) | HIS H785F1G2M: 860 MHz GPU, GDDR5-4800O/C to 1,220 MHz GDDR5-4800 | PowerColor 2GBD5-2DHPPV3E: 975 MHz GPU, GDDR5-6000O/C to 1,150 MHz GDDR5-6200 | PowerColor 2GBD5-2DHPPV3E: 975 MHz GPU, GDDR5-6000O/C to 1,200 MHz GDDR5-6400 |
Memory (Overclock) | 4 GB G.Skill DDR3-1600 CAS 9-9-9-24, O/C at 1.60 V to DDR3-1866 CL 9-9-9-24 | 8 GB Crucial DDR3-1600 CAS 8-8-8-24 1T, O/C at 1.50 V to 800 MHz CL 8-8-8-24 2T | 8 GB Crucial DDR3-1600 CAS 8-8-8-24, O/C at 1.60 V to DDR3-2133 CL 9-9-9-24 |
Motherboard (Overclock) | ASRock Z75 Pro3: LGA 1155, Intel Z75 ExpressStock 100 MHz BCLK | ASRock Z77 Pro3: LGA 1155, Intel Z77 ExpressStock 100 MHz BCLK | ASRock Z77 Extreme4: LGA 1155, Intel Z77 ExpressStock 100 MHz BCLK |
Optical | Samsung SH-224BB/RSBS 24x DVD±R | Samsung SH-224BB 24x DVD±R | Lite-On iHAS124 24x DVD±R |
Case | Xigmatek Asgard II B/B | Xigmatek Asgard II B/B | Rosewill Redbone U3 |
CPU Cooler | Intel Boxed Heat Sink and Fan | Rosewill RCX-ZAIO-92 | Cooler Master Hyper 212 Plus |
Storage | Seagate Barracuda 500 GB, 7,200 RPM SATA 6Gb/s HDD | Seagate Barracuda 500 GB, 7,200 RPM SATA 6Gb/s HDD | Mushkin Chronos Deluxe DX 240 GB, SATA 6Gb/s SSD |
Power | Antec Neo Eco 400C: 400 W, ATX12V v2.3, 80 PLUS | Antec Neo Eco 520C: ATX12V v2.3, 80 PLUS | Antec Neo Eco 520C: ATX12V v2.3, 80 PLUS |
Software | |||
OS | Microsoft Windows 8 Pro x64 | ||
Graphics | AMD Catalyst 13.1 | AMD Catalyst 13.2 Beta 5 | AMD Catalyst 13.1 |
Chipset | Intel INF 9.3.0.1025 | Intel INF 9.3.0.1025 | Intel INF 9.3.0.1026 |
Benchmarks: 3D Games | |
---|---|
Battlefield 3 | Campaign Mode, "Going Hunting" 90-Second Fraps Test Set 1: Medium Quality Defaults (No AA, 4x AF) Test Set 2: Ultra Quality Defaults (4x AA, 16x AF) |
F1 2012 | Version 1.2, Direct X 11, Built-in Benchmark Test Set 1: High Quality, No AA Test Set 2: Ultra Quality, 8x MSAA |
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim | Update 1.5.26, Celedon Aethirborn Level 6, 25-Second Fraps Test Set 1: DX11, High Details No AA, 8x AF, FXAA enabled Test Set 2: DX11, Ultra Details, 8x AA, 16x AF, FXAA enabled |
Far Cry 3 | V. 1.04, DirectX 11, 50-Second Fraps "Amanaki Outpost" Test Set 1: High Quality, No AA, Standard ATC., SSAO Test Set 2: Ultra Quality, 4x MSAA, Enhanced ATC, HDAO |
Benchmarks: Adobe Creative Suite | |
Adobe After Effects CS6 | Version 11.0.0.378 x64: Create Video which includes 3 Streams, 210 Frames, Render Multiple Frames Simultaneosly |
Adobe Photoshop CS6 | Version 13 x64: Filter 15.7 MB TIF Image: Radial Blur, Shape Blur, Median, Polar Coordinates |
Adobe Premeire Pro CS6 | Version 6.0.0.0, 6.61 GB MXF Project to H.264 to H.264 Blu-ray, Output 1920x1080, Maximum Quality |
Benchmarks: Audio/Video Encoding | |
iTunes | Version 10.4.1.10 x64: Audio CD (Terminator II SE), 53 minutes, default AAC format |
Lame MP3 | Version 3.98.3: Audio CD "Terminator II SE", 53 min, convert WAV to MP3 audio format, Command: -b 160 --nores (160 Kb/s) |
HandBrake CLI | Version: 0.98: Video from Canon Eos 7D (1920x1080, 25 FPS) 1 Minutes 22 Seconds Audio: PCM-S16, 48,000 Hz, 2-Kanal, to Video: AVC1 Audio: AAC (High Profile) |
TotalCode Studio 2.5 | Version: 2.5.0.10677: MPEG-2 to H.264, MainConcept H.264/AVC Codec, 28 sec HDTV 1920x1080 (MPEG-2), Audio: MPEG-2 (44.1 kHz, 2 Channel, 16-Bit, 224 Kb/s), Codec: H.264 Pro, Mode: PAL 50i (25 FPS), Profile: H.264 BD HDMV |
Benchmarks: Productivity | |
ABBYY FineReader | Version 10.0.102.95: Read PDF save to Doc, Source: Political Economy (J. Broadhurst 1842) 111 Pages |
Adobe Acrobat X | Version 10.0.0.396: Print PDF from 115 Page PowerPoint, 128-bit RC4 Encryption |
Autodesk 3ds Max 2012 | Version 14.0 x64: Space Flyby Mentalray, 248 Frames, 1440x1080 |
Blender | Version: 2.64a, Cycles Engine, Syntax blender -b thg.blend -f 1, 1920x1080, 8x Anti-Aliasing, Render THG.blend frame 1 |
Visual Studio 2010 | Version 10.0, Compile Google Chrome, Scripted |
Benchmarks: File Compression | |
WinZip | Version 17.0 Pro: THG-Workload (1.3 GB) to ZIP, command line switches "-a -ez -p -r" |
WinRAR | Version 4.2: THG-Workload (1.3 GB) to RAR, command line switches "winrar a -r -m3" |
7-Zip | Version 9.28: THG-Workload (1.3 GB) to .7z, command line switches "a -t7z -r -m0=LZMA2 -mx=5" |
Synthetic Benchmarks | |
3DMark 11 | Version: 1.0.1.0, Benchmark Only |
PCMark 7 | Version: 1.0.4 x64, System, Productivity, Hard Disk Drive benchmarks |
SiSoftware Sandra 2011 | Version Version 2013.01.19.11, CPU Test = CPU Arithmetic / Cryptography, Memory Test = Bandwidth Benchmark |
Current page: Hardware, Software, And Overclock Settings
Prev Page In Search Of The Best Possible Value Next Page Results: 3DMark And PCMarkStay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
-
plasmaj12345 thymanbearpigYou would think with an extra $200 you can get a noticeable difference in fps..Reply
The only real difference between the $800 and $1000 PC is that the $1000 has an SSD. They both have the same CPU, RAM, and GPU. Gaming should be about the same on both.
-
saxplayingcompnerd @thymanbearpig They use the same GPU, most games are GPU bottle-necked. That's how they get nearly the same FPS.Reply -
mayankleoboy1 Something i posted last quarter too :Reply
Why would all the machines have same percent emphasis on games and productivity apps ? Why would a $600 gaming PC be evaluated similarly to a $800 enthusiast PC ? The percentwise distribution of each metric should be based on what usage the build was meant for.
Something like : games, apps, storage.
$600 build : 85%, 15% . (cheapest, best gaming. Very few apps. Doesnt need fast storage. )
$800 build : 55%, 35%, 10% (slightly better games over apps. Great apps. fast storage for OS + apps OR games)
$1000 build. : 42.5%, 42.5%, 15% (equally good games and apps. fast storage should be plenty for OS+apps+games) -
Crashman ankit0x1still waiting for 2000$ buildHow about building up the $1000 machine into a dual-GPU added-storage $1600 PC?Reply -
mayankleoboy1 can we have a chart of the combined totals of :Reply
1) FPS in games
2)time taken in apps
for each build?
so that we may draw our own conclusions from the data? I am not entirely satisfied with the conclusions you have drawn. -
Crashman mayankleoboy1can we have a chart of the combined totals of :1) FPS in games2)time taken in appsfor each build?so that we may draw our own conclusions from the data? I am not entirely satisfied with the conclusions you have drawn.Percentages are just as accurate, you'll find those on Page 13 along with power numbers.Reply
-
bdizzle11 For next SBM how about a $800, $1200, $1600. A little bit higher but more spread. I think that would better determine the sweet spot...Reply -
atomicWAR Honestly i would like to see an up-graders marathon. With price points of 600, 800, 1000, 1300, 1600, 2000 covered all using the same case, CD/dvd, and mech HDD (not included in cost). Those are the most common carry over parts besides my water-cooling that carries over build to build. I believe it would be a very useful and realistic application of funds many of your readers could relate to.Reply