Creative's E-MU 1820 Goes Home Studio Pro
Behavior At 48 KHz/24 Bits
The switch from 44 to 48 kHz doesn't make much change in performance on a card of this type, which ought to show its best performance at any sampling frequency.
Frequency response : Unfortunately, the linearity of the response in extreme treble did not improve, but extended to a slightly higher level. Overall, the result remained very good.
Noise level : The result was noticeably identical to the (excellent) one obtained at 44 kHz.
Dynamic capacity : Here again, the figures were very close and excellent.
Distortion : No change with an initial harmonic that was already around -110 dB!
Intermodulation : Identical, excellent readings.
Stereo separation : The values remained very high. In practice there was zero diaphony.
Stay on the Cutting Edge
Join the experts who read Tom's Hardware for the inside track on enthusiast PC tech news — and have for over 25 years. We'll send breaking news and in-depth reviews of CPUs, GPUs, AI, maker hardware and more straight to your inbox.
So, overall, the 1820 is guilty of having a frequency response marked with a very slight attenuation in the extreme treble. This is a matter of manufacturer choice, since the manufacturer opted for very low noise and excellent dynamics. There's nothing more to say: the 1820 is much better than mass-market sound cards and many competing cards for musicians. This would apply even more with a high-quality 1820M. As a reminder, the distortion is too slight to worry anyone and the diaphony is unlikely to interfere with your recordings!
Current page: Behavior At 48 KHz/24 Bits
Prev Page Behavior At 44.1 KHz/24 Bits Next Page In Practice, In The Studio