GeForce GTX 295 Performance: Previewed
Benchmark Results: Dead Space
Dead Space is the latest space-horror adapted from the console world to the PC—and unfortunately, it’s painfully apparent in everything from control to graphics quality.
Though we have AA numbers represented here (with corresponding performance dings suggesting that forcing AA and AF in the drivers is actually doing something), there were still very obvious jagged edges, even at 1920x1200 and 2560x1600. Additionally, the Radeon HD 4870 X2 exhibited some strange, repeatable behavior at 1900x1200, scoring lower than the 2560x1600 result.
This title is clearly dominated by Nvidia’s hardware, with even the GTX 280 besting AMD’s flagship. However, it isn’t a game we’d add to our full-time test suite, if only because of the questionable effectiveness of its graphics settings.
Update: In discussing our results with Nvidia, it seems that Dead Space has its own AA path, which is why forcing settings in the control panel has no effect on the game’s visuals. You can turn on AA in the game itself, but doing so made no performance difference in our benchmark.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Current page: Benchmark Results: Dead Space
Prev Page Benchmark Results: Call of Duty: World At War Next Page Benchmark Results: Fallout 3-
Tindytim First!?Reply
Why do I get the feeling AMD is already working on something to bust Nvidia again? -
NarwhaleAu Your conclusion was, at best, poor.Reply
Nvidia's "fastest single card" is two 280s on a single PCB, selling at the price point that ATI is selling their 4870x2 at right now?
It is a lot cheaper to produce the 4870 GPU, so I am sure you will see ATI cut their price down by at least $50, and maybe $100. Nvidia will then have the same problem - a monolithic GPU that is expensive to produce and not really any faster than the 4870.
-
xsane I totally agree with him on the Physx and CUDA comment. It would be really nice to have a game like Tiger Woods support Physx.Reply
I have 2 x 4850 in crossfire, it kicks ass. -
trainreks good to see that nvidia whipped back into submission. Their prices were ridiculous when they were on the top for a long time.Reply -
malveaux NarwhaleAU:Reply
You clearly need to re-read this article.
And cutting prices $50? $100? Yea, born yesterday? Not happening.
@Article
Thanks for the preview! I've been looking out for the GTX295 to surface. Two GTX260's should perform right on par with the thing, and I was wondering what the price would turn out to be. You can get GTX260's for $219 from the Egg right now (or $440 for two). If the GTX295 is only a single card at $499 (likely to be 20 less at the Egg), it's right on the same price area as buying two 260's separately. And in that situation, I'd rather have a single card with the same power. As would most folk I wager. So looks like the 295 is gonna be a real winner in the enthusiast market.
Very best, -
JAYDEEJOHN Thanks for being open and honest, and mentioning nVidias mandate. It looks as expected, and is a shame we dont have a larger picture of full performance, since nVidia hamstringed you guys. Good to see some competition at the highendReply -
sparky2010 The problem with ATI is that they release good products but give them incomplete/unoptimized drivers.. to see games where the difference between the 4870 and the X2 is almost nil, but the GTX 295 is doing well in it, well, that's no excuse for ATI.. it's too bad though.. i really hope they could just give us good drivers from the beginning, instead of giving us "performance upgrade packages"..Reply
I hope that their next driver will see more optimization, and then a showdown! CROSSFIRE X vs. QUAD SLI!!!! MUAHAHAHA!
Bets down please?