Intel 750 Series 400GB Versus Samsung SM951 512GB
We're pitting Intel's 400GB SSD 750 against Samsung's 512GB SM951 because they're the fastest PCIe-based drives in their respective categories today.
Why you can trust Tom's Hardware
Sequential Read
To read about our storage tests in-depth, please check out How We Test HDDs And SSDs. Four-corner testing is covered on page six.


We first noticed a dip in QD2 sequential read performance on the 1.2TB SSD 750 just prior to publishing our review. We ran an additional test to verify our initial results. Unfortunately, the 400GB model encounters the same hit, and performance drops off lower than sequential reads at QD1 and QD4.
Samsung's SM951 512GB delivers higher sequential read performance at lower queue depths, but can't match the same peak numbers as Intel's SSD 750 at high queue depths.
It's important to understand that most client workloads happen at low queue depths. Drive vendors typically don't specify performance at those queue depths, where it really counts. And we don't blame them. Peaks always looks better on paper. They just don't always represent usable performance.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Current page: Sequential Read
Prev Page A Closer Look at Intel SSD 750 Series Next Page Sequential Write
Chris Ramseyer was a senior contributing editor for Tom's Hardware. He tested and reviewed consumer storage.