The OCZ Vertex 2 Conspiracy: Lost Space, Lost Speed?
Several readers contacted me in the past two weeks, complaining about OCZ's recent adoption of 25 nm NAND and its effect on the capacity and performance of certain SSDs that they expected to be both larger and faster. I bought my own drives to compare.
Benchmark Results: 4 KB and 512 KB Random Writes
Writing data to the drive is similarly affected by queue depth, though the 34 nm-based Vertex 2 picks up significantly more performance when it’s bombed with concurrent requests.
Contrary to what we saw on the previous page, rerunning the test using 512 KB writes does not seem to help performance.
The fact that the Iometer chart shows a relatively minor IOPS hit using compressible data is promising. But CrystalDiskMark’s results are far less impressive across the board, faced with random data.
Stay on the Cutting Edge
Join the experts who read Tom's Hardware for the inside track on enthusiast PC tech news — and have for over 25 years. We'll send breaking news and in-depth reviews of CPUs, GPUs, AI, maker hardware and more straight to your inbox.
Current page: Benchmark Results: 4 KB and 512 KB Random Writes
Prev Page Benchmark Results: 4 KB and 512 KB Random Reads Next Page Benchmark Results: PCMark Vantage Storage Test