In the second part of our mainstream power supply test, we compare seven additional units with a maximum power of 700 watts. To enable an easier comparison, the units from the first part have been included in the charts for this piece as well.
The new candidates in the comparison are as follows :
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Manufacturer
Power Supply Model
Corsair
HX520W
Enermax
Modu 82+ 525W
Fortron/FSP
Everest 80Plus 600
Hiper
Type R MK II 680
PC Power & Cooling
Silencer 610W
Silver Power
SP-SS500
Tagan
TG680-U33II
And of course, the power supplies already tested in the previous part :
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Manufacturer
Power supply
Antec
Signature
Cooler Master
Silent Pro 500 W
Dragon Force
DF-530GT
Silverstone
SST-ST70F Strider
Thermaltake
Toughpower QFan 650W
On to the first model, Enermax’s Modu 82+...
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
I use the Enermax Modu82+ 625W version (same design) and I can attest the 12v rails are rock solid, they just don't sag or dip under any load.
The fan is interesting, I am used to the variable control knob but I do not miss it as the fan is silent under all but the heaviest sustained load and then it is audible, but not loud. It is a 120MM fan (quieter) but it is clear (louder). The fans' RPM monitoring lead is a must for my system board monitoring program as I could adjust other fans and settings based on the PSU fan RPM if I wanted, but as I run a near silent system, I have no need.
I wish it was $50 cheaper, but you get your money's worth, no mistaking that.
Hi,
I sill miss some bits.
I would like to see how overcurrent and overheat protection works, whether mains spikes can damage the power supply.
Whether joining +5V with +12V rail (as may happen when e.g. CDROM fails) will burn the other components.
And noise/heat level.
Yep just about as informative as the first part, IE. not very.
Unless you put the thing under load and oscilloscope the outputs for ripple and open it up to see the type of parts used and the construction quality. reviews of this type are next to meaningless.
Clearly these folks don't know about the different colors of the 80+
program. The enermax is rated at the bronze level which must be 82% efficient. There is also the silver and gold level rating.
"For what it’s worth, that’s good enough to qualify the supply for the 80Plus Bronze certification, if Enermax pursued it."
Not only did enermax pursue it, but if you go to 80plus.org, you will
see that they are already certified at the bronze level. (80plus.org is
down right now, or I would provide a url showing it.)
If you go to enermax's site, http://www.enermaxusa.com/catalog/index.php?cPath=21_56
they have a big honking picture of the 80+ bronze certificate and the 6 power supplies it applies to. I fear tomshardware has not done their homework.
Other than owning a 5 year old Enermax, I have nothing to do with the
company. I have 5 antec earthwatts powersupplies, and a seasonic power supply in my 80+ collection.
Listing "Confusing “82+” specification in the product name" as a negative, clearly shows where the confusion lies, and it isn't with enermax.
The 80+ standard is several years old. The newer colored standards of bronze, silver, and gold are newer, but that is the wonder of technology.
For a technology web site, keeping up with newer things such as standards is necessary.