Five $160 To $240 990FX-Based Socket AM3+ Motherboards
Forty-two PCIe lanes give the 990FX a clear connectivity lead over competing Intel chipsets. We compare five class-leading products using AMD's FX-8150 to see which offers the best combination of performance, overclocking, integrated features, and value.
990FXA-UD7 Firmware
Gigabyte's Hybrid EFI takes a beating from the marketing departments of its competitors, but we have yet to see any of its competitors’ claims against it demonstrated in a meaningful way. With Windows 8 on the horizon, suggestions that UEFI will be required could turn out to be true. Then again, we're still waiting for proof that UEFI will help slash the boot time of Microsoft's next-gen operating system.
Gigabyte’s traditional M.I.T. menu provides most of the settings needed to extract ultimate performance from any compatible CPU.
A full set of frequency, ratio, and voltage controls are present. But we were a little disappointed to find fixed-voltage mode missing for the CPU. Something else is also missing…
We find that missing something in the 990FXA-UD7’s “Advanced Features” menu. Multi-level Load Line control allows overclockers to overcome a phenomenon known as Vdroop, where CPU voltage is normally reduced under high loads.
Getting back to the M.I.T. menu, we find a fairly complete set of DRAM timings and clock strength controls in its “DRAM Configuration” submenu.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
-
timbo1130 How is this relevant to enthusiast? Bulldozer is out classed by Sandy Bridge I don't care if there are a few less sata ports. If you need to upgrade your better off going with Sandy bridge and z68 or p67 or wait for SB-E and X79.Reply -
julianbautista87 thanks for this article. I was waiting for it since some guy said that the 8150 was performing badly because of the mainboard used, but now I see that that was not correct.Reply -
_Pez_ Yeah If were to buy this boards would be with a Phenom real 6 core CPU 1100T :D that is the smartest choice. I think.Reply -
frostweaver I would wait till next year to decide. I still feel that windows 7 aint optimized for BD.Reply -
Tijok First off, thanks for the great article, good to see Tom's is keeping up the top notch quality!Reply
Secondly, I would really like to see a piece on extreme CFX/SLI configurations on rigs like this. It seems an article with reliable information on this would be beneficial to gaming enthusiasts, IT professionals, and HPC builders alike!
Hope to see an article along these lines soon! -
palladin9479 I bought the Sabertooth during the summer and I can attest to how amazing that board is. It's really nice, lots of features and high quality. I'm running a Phenom II X4 970BE @ 4.3Ghz on water right now. Absolutely wonderful system.Reply -
ta152h What a bunch of pretzel logic we have in this article.ReplyOf course, a fan of Intel's work could argue against the need for 42 lanes of second-gen PCIe when the 36 native to X58 Express support multi-card graphics configurations just as capably. But such a comparison really isn't necessary. After all, we've known for almost a year that Intel’s lower-cost Sandy Bridge-based part outperform the pricey six-core Gulftown-based processors in many desktop benchmarks, including pretty much every gaming scenario we throw at the two platforms.
So, x58 is irrelevant, because SB beats it. Except AMD's offering is somehow relevant even though both x58 and SB beat it. What?????
If you ignore x58 because SB offers better performance, you ignore anything AMD has because a SB setup offers better performance. If you want 36 or less lanes, x58 still offers better processors than you can hope to get from AMD. Bizarre logic.
Not that AMD is irrelevant, just the logic is badly flawed.