Benchmark Results: Multimedia
In short, the video playback and recording performance of Thecus' N8800PRO running Open-E trails the five-bay NAS servers from Synology and Qnap. It's worth noting, however, that the N8800PRO's host Core 2 Duo has to perform XOR operations for an eight-disk RAID array, whereas the other servers are presented with a comparatively lesser five-drive load. Thus, we'd expect to see the lower throughput reflected here.
For the hardware price, I'd go for a Dell R510. it's about the same price. Then I'd run CentOS 5 or 6 on it. CentOS can do most of what this thing can do with no cost. Or the business could opt for Win 2k8 r2 for $600 more or MS SBS for $800 more and get an easier to manage system that any yahoo proclaiming to be an admin could fix.
IOP performance is garbage on SATA drives, and I've seen FreeNAS do a better job than what was portrayed in this article.
As far as the performance, I'd say it was right in line with low end devices using iSCSI.
Any iSCSI devices you can pretty much count the 1GB ethernet link as the bottle neck, which puts it around 100 - 125 max. 2x Multi pathing may bring that up to around 190, but good luck achieving usable transfer rates of 250+ as peter claims.
For the money i'd choose dgingeri's dell in a heart beat.
Al changes , done to the storage , were done in some xml files of the application
Needles to say that whenever you did anything in command line , the web apllication would not recognize the result
That said, keep up the good work in your core space Tom's!