Bernie Sanders pushes for 50% public ownership of American AI companies — proposes AI sovereign wealth fund that would hold direct ownership stakes in largest AI firms

Bernie Sanders on a podium with a Fight Oligarchy sign
(Image credit: Getty Images)

U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) has announced that he will introduce a bill that would force the largest American AI firms to hand over half of their stock to the public. The senator proposes a 50% tax on the stock of these firms, which, it seems, will be held by the public through a sovereign wealth fund. It would also mean that the government would have a direct ownership stake in these companies, allowing the people to have a say in how these companies would run.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Jowi Morales
Contributing Writer

Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.

  • ezst036
    Isn't he calling for government ownership, not public ownership?
    Reply
  • Rand0m_Guy
    Using Bernie's own logic, he is a millionaire, that wealth was built on the "collective" of the tax payer. So the tax payer owns 50% of all his belongings and I can freely move in and out of his home as I please? Really Bernie, give me a break!
    Reply
  • Why_Me
    He's grandstanding as usual. That bill has zero % chance of passing and he knows it.
    Reply
  • ezst036
    Rand0m_Guy said:
    Using Bernie's own logic, he is a millionaire, that wealth was built on the "collective" of the tax payer. So the tax payer owns 50% of all his belongings and I can freely move in and out of his home as I please? Really Bernie, give me a break!
    True to some extent.

    His house is not deemed "public" though. So you cannot enter. But then again these data centers would not be theme parks, you couldn't enter there either. They would be all locked up.

    Just like you can't enter Fort Knox, the vaults of the Library of Congress, or the Pentagon.

    The word "public" is being grossly waterboarded here.

    None of this would be "public".
    Reply
  • ravewulf
    I love Bernie, but I doubt he thinks this proposal will go through; the key is to get the conversation started to see what can work. We will eventually need to move to Universal Basic Income (UBI) at a minimum, if not higher than that. Of course, AI companies also need to demonstrate some real long-term profitability...
    Reply
  • usertests
    They stole a charity and turned into a public-private partnership!
    Reply
  • derekullo
    usertests said:
    They stole a charity and turned into a public-private partnership!
    A charity can't afford to lose $800 Million each month !
    Reply
  • Why_Me
    ravewulf said:
    I love Bernie, but I doubt he thinks this proposal will go through; the key is to get the conversation started to see what can work. We will eventually need to move to Universal Basic Income (UBI) at a minimum, if not higher than that. Of course, AI companies also need to demonstrate some real long-term profitability...
    How about no.
    Reply
  • Rand0m_Guy
    ezst036 said:
    True to some extent.

    His house is not deemed "public" though. So you cannot enter. But then again these data centers would not be theme parks, you couldn't enter there either. They would be all locked up.

    Just like you can't enter Fort Knox, the vaults of the Library of Congress, or the Pentagon.

    The word "public" is being grossly waterboarded here.

    None of this would be "public".
    Kind of my point, satire doesnt come through so well in text form, there is nothing "public" about this proposal. This is akin to Obama's 2012 "you didn't build that" so government should take it... um NO!
    Reply
  • Faiakes
    Why only 50%?

    They siphoned, without permission human knowledge and even copyrighted works.

    Their software was built, partly, on publicly available knowledge that was the result of previous advances, none of which they paid for.
    Reply