Intel Documents Leak Two More 32nm Atom Processors

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Wolfgang Gruener
Contributor

Wolfgang Gruener is an experienced professional in digital strategy and content, specializing in web strategy, content architecture, user experience, and applying AI in content operations within the insurtech industry. His previous roles include Director, Digital Strategy and Content Experience at American Eagle, Managing Editor at TG Daily, and contributing to publications like Tom's Guide and Tom's Hardware.

  • DjEaZy
    ... just DX9? Common?!
    Reply
  • house70
    DjEaZy... just DX9? Common?!Can't have it both ways, buddy. Weak CPU for strong power savings, or the other way around. If powerful gaming is what you're after, this CPU is not for you.
    Reply
  • rpmrush
    It's Atom..what do you want? DX11 support when it can barely muster blu ray play back? C'mon..get a grip!
    Reply
  • pbrigido
    DjEaZy... just DX9? Common?!
    No need to complain about this only having DX9...it is an Atom.
    Reply
  • ojas
    how is this a "leaked" doc if they've published it on their site???
    Reply
  • amk-aka-Phantom
    Cool story, cool story, but I made sure NO ONE whom I know buys anything lower than an i3. Enough crappy low-tier systems that break in a year or two! High-end parts only.
    Reply
  • LuckyDucky7
    No need to complain about this only having DX9...it is an Atom.

    Yeah, because there's no processor out there that has good integrated graphics in a power envelope of 10W.

    Oh wait. It's called the AMD C-60 APU.

    And as for less that 6W? Well, there's the Z-01. That's 5.9W and supports DX11.

    Oh yeah, and those ones came out in June (August for the C-60).
    Reply
  • rottingsheep
    i'm waiting for proper reviews for the netbook cpus.
    Reply
  • rottingsheep
    no support for flash 11 and above. bad
    Reply
  • jacobdrj
    Yeah, it is looking more and more like my next netbook will be an AMD...

    Just need to find one with the right form-factor and features.
    Reply