Intel's Nova Lake CPUs gear up to seize AMD’s 3D V-Cache gaming throne — early leak points to up to 52 cores, blazing DDR5-8000 support, and massive 175W TDP

Core Ultra 200K Plus
(Image credit: Intel)

The Core Ultra 200K Plus (codenamed Arrow Lake Refresh) series reestablished Intel’s place in the processor market, but that's just the start. With its next-generation Core Ultra 400S (Nova Lake) chips, Intel intends to leave no doubt about who makes the best CPUs for gaming on the market. According to the latest VideoCardz leak, Nova Lake could deliver a knockout blow to AMD's upcoming Zen 6 chips with beefy rumored specifications.

Intel is preparing to launch its highly anticipated Nova Lake chips under the Core Ultra Series 4 banner. It's a logical move, since Core Ultra Series 3 is already taken by Panther Lake. The next-generation desktop chips will reportedly adopt the Core Ultra 400S branding. Nova Lake will harness the power of Coyote Cove P-cores and Arctic Wolf E-cores, rumored to deliver a remarkable 20% IPC improvement over the already impressive Lion Cove and Skymont cores.

Latest Videos From

Yet, perhaps the most groundbreaking feature of Nova Lake is the rumored introduction of a massive Big Last Level Cache (bLLC), designed to go head-to-head with AMD’s 3D V-Cache technology. If there is any credence to the early rumors, the L3 cache capacity inside Nova Lake could range from 144 MB to 288 MB, a feature that would dramatically boost gaming and productivity performance by reducing memory latency and improving data access speeds.

Intel Core Ultra 400S Designs*

Swipe to scroll horizontally

Cores

Die Type

Configuration

LP E-Cores

NPU

Memory

PCIe 5.0 Lanes

Thunderbolt 5 Ports

Xe3 Cores

52

Dual

8P + 16E + Cache x 2

4

NPU 6

Dual Channel

24

2

2

28

Dual

8P + 16E + Cache

4

NPU 6

Dual Channel

24

2

2

28

Single

8P + 16E

4

NPU 6

Dual Channel

24

2

2

16

Single

4P + 8E

4

NPU 6

Dual Channel

24

2

2

8

Single

4P + 0E

4

NPU 6

Dual Channel

24

2

2

*Specifications are unconfirmed by Intel.

Intel is reportedly developing an ambitious lineup of five desktop die packages for its upcoming Nova Lake platform, targeting a wide range of users and workloads. The leaked information reveals that the core configurations will range from eight-core models to an industry-leading 52-core powerhouse.

The octa-core and 16-core chips seemingly use a single compute-die architecture, featuring four high-performance P-cores and either four or eight space-efficient E-cores. The approach aims to deliver a balanced blend of performance and efficiency for mainstream users.

Stepping up, the 28-core variant will reportedly come in both single-die and dual-die formats, maintaining a configuration of eight P-cores and 16 E-cores. The dual-die version, however, stands out by incorporating Intel’s bLLC. At the top of the stack is the flagship Nova Lake chip that's rumored to have a jaw-dropping 52 cores. This high-end SKU will supposedly employ a dual-die layout, packing a total of 16 P-cores and 32 E-cores, and doubling the bLLC capacity of the 28-core version.

Regardless of the design, all Nova Lake chips have Hub dies integrated with four Arctic Wolf LPE cores, an NPU 6 unit, dual-channel DDR5 support, 24 high-speed PCIe 5.0 lanes, two Thunderbolt 5 ports, and an integrated graphics engine with two Xe3 cores — this is all familiar territory for Intel's more recent CPU releases. The leak also claims DDR5-8000 support as well as ECC, CUDIMM, and CSODIMM memory modules. In terms of PCIe configurations, Nova Lake supports a discrete graphics card via a PCIe 5.0 x16 expansion slot. There was also mention of processor bifurcation in a 4x4 arrangement and up to three PCIe x4 links from the 900-series chipset. Nova Lake could support up to eight SSDs across the PCIe 5.0, PCIe 4.0, and Thunderbolt 5 connections.

Intel Core Ultra 400S Specifications*

Swipe to scroll horizontally

Processor

Cores

P-cores + E-cores + LP-cores

Code

TDP / cTDP (W)

?

52

(8 + 16) x 2 + 4

P3DX

175

?

44

(8 + 12) x 2 + 4

P2DX

175

Core Ultra 9

28

8 + 16 + 4

P2D

125

Core Ultra 9

28

8 + 16 + 4

P2K

125 / 65

Core Ultra 9

22

6 + 12 + 4

P2

65

Core Ultra 7

24

8 + 12 + 4

P1D

125

Core Ultra 7

24

8 + 12 + 4

P1K

125 / 65

Core Ultra 7

16

4 + 8 + 4

P1

65 / 35

Core Ultra 5

22

6 + 12 + 4

MS2K / MS2KF

125 / 65

Core Ultra 5

12

4 + 4 + 4

MS2

65 / 35

Core Ultra 5

8

4 + 0 + 4

MS1

65 / 35

Core Ultra 3

6

2 + 0 + 4

T1

65 / 35

*Specifications are unconfirmed by Intel.

Intel may pull all the stops on its Nova Lake launch and flood the market with up to 13 SKUs, ranging from the accessible Core Ultra 3 to the elite Core Ultra 9. However, it's still uncertain how Intel will market the 44- and 52-core SKUs, but these may be the rumored Core X series for the HEDT market, a segment that Intel has abandoned for a while. Additionally, Intel doesn't usually launch a full stack of CPUs at once. We'll most likely see a lineup of three to four chips out of the gate if Intel's previous releases are any indication.

With their unprecedented core counts, the Nova Lake 44- and 52-core chips are set to push thermal and power boundaries to new heights. Intel’s Product Base Power (PBP) for these powerhouse CPUs will reportedly reach up to 175W, a significant 40% increase over the current Core Ultra 9 285K flagship. The incredible jump in processing capability justifies this leap in power consumption, as these chips are expected to offer more than double the core count of Intel's current offerings.

Examining the leaked Nova Lake SKU list reveals that, at first glance, the upcoming processors largely mirror the Arrow Lake models they are set to replace in both core counts and product positioning. However, Nova Lake includes the LPE cores, adding an extra four cores across the range for improved multitasking and background task handling.

While the headline-grabbing 44- and 52-core chips feature much higher PBP figures, the rest of the lineup maintains familiar power profiles, with unlocked models operating at 125W. Intel will continue to offer 65W and 35W power-optimized variants, catering to a broad range of system builds. Notably, this generation reportedly marks the return of a Core Ultra 3 SKU, filling a gap left by Arrow Lake and broadening access to Nova Lake’s advances for more budget-conscious consumers.

Nova Lake will launch on Intel’s brand-new LGA1954 socket, marking a significant step forward for the company’s desktop platform. According to materials reviewed by VideoCardz, Intel is placing a strong emphasis on the Socket V solution’s reusability and forward compatibility. Socket longevity is important for consumers and system builders alike. By designing the LGA1954 socket to be compatible with multiple generations of processors, Intel is addressing a long-standing criticism regarding the short-lived nature of its recent sockets, such as the LGA1851, which saw limited generational support.

Intel has confirmed that Nova Lake will arrive in late 2026. However, due to the current climate, many believe early 2027 is a more rational time, but we'll have to wait and see.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Zhiye Liu
News Editor, RAM Reviewer & SSD Technician

Zhiye Liu is a news editor, memory reviewer, and SSD tester at Tom’s Hardware. Although he loves everything that’s hardware, he has a soft spot for CPUs, GPUs, and RAM.

  • Makaveli
    52 cores that will be idle for the most part.

    Will be interesting to see how it goes as it will be facing Zen 6 also with 144MB of X3D cache per CCD.
    Reply
  • usertests
    Makaveli said:
    52 cores that will be idle for the most part.

    Will be interesting to see how it goes as it will be facing Zen 6 also with 144MB of X3D cache per CCD.
    If you do manage to load up all 52 cores, you may end up using 350-450 Watts.

    It will be nice to see head-to-head competition for X3D, presumably surpassing Zen 5 X3D with Intel's first try.
    Reply
  • hotaru251
    Makaveli said:
    52 cores that will be idle for the most part.
    also fact that some stuff literally freaks out if you cpu has too many cores. (less common now-a-days but still happens)
    anything over 32cores should be like TR.... basically budget server grade.

    will say AMD seems to always be what intel needs to do stuff. increasing core count, "chiplet" design, now now v-cache.

    just hope it continues going well for em as amd needs competition again as they are starting to get the bad habits of arrogance after intels slacking.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    usertests said:
    If you do manage to load up all 52 cores, you may end up using 350-450 Watts.
    The comments section of the VC article is a goldmine because Jaykihn added information, context and answered questions. The preliminary performance PL2 is 471W (expected to change).

    Other preliminary info:

    There are no more T SKUs which is part of why the lineup currently looks weird: yay marketing.

    TB5 support exists, but requires a retimer so isn't a baseline feature like TB4. It's also restricted to the Z990/W980/Q990 chipsets.

    The bLLC parts use a D suffix for unlocked and the dual Compute Tile ones are DX.

    The 6 P-core bLLC SKU is new and may be moved around depending on how it comes to market.
    Reply
  • rluker5
    Makaveli said:
    52 cores that will be idle for the most part.
    You can say the same with 8 cores for most people.
    You just get a little more performance for non workstation tasks over 6.
    But if you want 288MB of what is looking to be unified cache you need 44 cores.
    Reply
  • usertests
    thestryker said:
    The comments section of the VC article is a goldmine because Jaykihn added information, context and answered questions. The preliminary performance PL2 is 471W (expected to change).
    I noticed. Jaykihn helped clarify some of the very confusing stuff in the article, which barely mentioned bLLC at all.

    Yeah, I doubt it's going to need 450W in the end, so I just gave a range. 14900KS didn't even pull over ~320W in the Tom's review.
    thestryker said:
    There are no more T SKUs which is part of why the lineup currently looks weird: yay marketing.
    Users could benefit by selecting the cTDP they prefer to run at, users and benchmark sites will be impacted by 35W and 65W being mashed into one part. Oh well.
    thestryker said:
    The 6 P-core bLLC SKU is new and may be moved around depending on how it comes to market.
    I think it was a clarification of a non-existent 7 P-core SKU.

    It will be interesting to see how cheap that part gets, and when it launches. Facing no cache-based competition, AMD takes its time launching budget X3D parts. At least those should have 8 or 10 cores starting with Zen 6.
    rluker5 said:
    But if you want 288MB of what is looking to be unified cache you need 44 cores.
    I doubt it's going to be unified. It should be the same deal as the 9950X3D2, and the exact same L3 cache as a Zen 6 successor to the 9950X3D2.
    Reply
  • kinney
    I've been waiting years for this release. Unfortunately my Z590 board died on me and those have dried up on the used market. I had no real choice unless I was going to lock myself into a non 3D V-Cache / bLLC setup for many years, so I had to get a 9850X3D. Works a lot better from a reliability and stability standpoint than all of my prior Ryzen builds (1700, 1800X, 2700X, 5900X) for sure. Probably my best AMD build since my AMD 286, and less finicky than those Ryzens or my Thunderbird, FX55 and other builds.

    It'd be nice to have Nova Lake-S but Intel just took too damn long for me. I'm also unsure I need more than 700-1200FPS in Valorant or not, so whatever performance bump I would get probably isn't worth the CPU/board swap. It will be very interesting to see how much faster Nova Lake is than Zen 5 or if we're at the point of diminishing returns on what cache can do. I'm expecting Intel domination of Zen 5 and 6. Especially after seeing the 270K improvements even without bLLC.

    One thing I've learned over the last 40 years is that sometimes buying the tried-and-tested platform like Zen 5 is a blessing in disguise. As most things new have bugs and issues to be worked out and you get to be the beta tester. But it looks like LGA1954 and Nova Lake built on Intel's exceptional platform engineering is going to be the way to go for anyone needing an upgrade.
    Reply
  • usertests
    kinney said:
    It will be very interesting to see how much faster Nova Lake is than Zen 5 or if we're at the point of diminishing returns on what cache can do.
    The average uplift will see diminishing returns, but specific games will keep benefiting from more cache up to a certain point.

    Having a new per-CCD/tile L3 cache size on the market (144 MiB) from two companies will be exciting. And it may be followed by a ~56% increase with Zen 7 (224 MiB) on the same socket. We'll definitely see diminishing returns.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    usertests said:
    Yeah, I doubt it's going to need 450W in the end, so I just gave a range. 14900KS didn't even pull over ~320W in the Tom's review.
    If NVL is going to be 250W PL2 for 8/16 then I don't think I'd run less than 450W PL2 for a dual Compute Tile part. However I'm pretty confident these will have more compute than the top Zen 6 desktop part will have so Intel might want to cut the PL2 as low as they can to still stay ahead without blowing the power budget.

    Without power limits my 270K Plus is around 280W package power when running Cinebench 2024 multi and my 265K was around 210W. Intel is definitely getting better with the standard power ratings being meaningful rather than just holding the CPU in check.
    usertests said:
    I doubt it's going to be unified. It should be the same deal as the 9950X3D2, and the exact same L3 cache as a Zen 6 successor to the 9950X3D2.
    This is the million dollar question as it were. So far it sounds like the dual Compute Tile parts are only going to be bLLC. Since those are their own separate die Intel could add in a ring stop that is for direct Compute Tile interconnect. While nothing is free this would be about as low latency as is currently possible (think the SPR/EMR tile designs).

    No matter what I'm extremely curious as to how the tiles are going to fit together for the dual Compute Tile parts given that the other tiles are all the same across the stack.
    Reply
  • beyondlogic
    Admin said:
    VideoCardz shares the alleged preliminary SKU list for Intel's upcoming Core Ultra 400S (codenamed Nova Lake) processors.

    Intel's Nova Lake CPUs gear up to seize AMD’s 3D V-Cache gaming throne — early leak points to up to 52 cores, blazing DDR5-8000 support, and massiv... : Read more
    ha the cpu will be cheaper them the damn ram. also 175 tdp is quite nuts will need to turn of the heating with that thing on lol europe will love it in winter.
    Reply