The CPU on our test bed was overclocked to 3.47 GHz. We used the current Catalyst 8.8 drivers from AMD and GeForce 177.92 (Beta) from Nvidia. The graphics cards in the test were the Radeon HD 3870, HD 4850, HD 4870, GeForce 8800 GTS 512, 9600 GT 1024, 9800 GTX, GTX 260, and GTX 280. You shouldn’t take the following charts and test numbers too seriously, though, because AMD and Nvidia are inevitably going to optimize the graphics drivers anyway.
Western Digital WD5000AAKS 500 GB, S-ATA, 16 MB Cache,Hitachi 120 GB, S-ATA, 8 MB Cache
Power Supply
CoolerMaster RS-850-EMBA 850 W
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Graphic
AMD Catalyst 8.8Nvidia ForceWare 177.92
Operating System
Windows Vista Enterprise SP1
DirectX
10 und 10.1
Chipset Driver
X38 Intel 8.3.1.1009780i Nvidia nForce 9.64
Stay on the Cutting Edge
Join the experts who read Tom's Hardware for the inside track on enthusiast PC tech news — and have for over 25 years. We'll send breaking news and in-depth reviews of CPUs, GPUs, AI, maker hardware and more straight to your inbox.
Aside from the numerous pages that don't work, was a 24-page analysis of STALKER, a fairly mediocre shooter, really necessary? Is a 24-page analysis of any game necessary? Sigh anything to please devs and grab ad dollars -_-
hmm ... I loled when I saw the graphics error in the water tests. the camo-net disappeared everywhere it obscured water in all modes other than static. but you get a nice looking water effect :-)
I was wondering if I can get this game to run on reasonable terms on a HD4670 or HD3850. Based on the HD3870 results, it looks like it would be playable ...
V3ctorPage 7 is not available... It gives an error, as if the page doesn't exist.
Not sure what you're seeing (or not, in this case), but everything is working over here. Any more detail?
magicandySigh anything to please devs and grab ad dollars -_-Dude, the GSC can't even afford to hire a dozen half-decent developers, let alone pay for ads.