Desktop Vendors Not Keen on Using Chrome OS
Unnamed vendors have said that Google needs to provide more resources and support if it's serious about Chrome OS on desktops.
DigiTimes reports that desktop PC vendors seemingly turned their nose up at Google's Chrome OS during executive chairman Eric Schmidt's speech in Taiwan on Wednesday. He was reportedly promoting Chrome OS as a high-profile option to Windows 7 and Ubuntu, focusing on the software's fast boot time, a lack of virus issues and the fact that it will be offered free of charge. He urged vendors to give Chrome OS a try.
But unnamed vendors on Wednesday said that if Google really wants to cut into the PC sector, then it will need to provide more resources and support than it has with the current crop of Chromebooks. As it stands now, there has been very little demand for Chromebooks since Acer and Samsung launched their versions back in June. The former company reportedly only sold 5,000 units by the end of July, and the latter Samsung was said to have sold even less than that in the same timeframe.
According to the unnamed vendors, the problem Chrome OS faces is that it's still too idealized. Consumers and businesses have yet to fully embrace cloud computing, storing documents and media locally on their physical drives. Popular applications are just now shifting over into the cloud by way of HTML5, but most highly-used and long-standing applications like Microsoft Office and Adobe Creative Suite are still installed locally and used offline.
The vendors also indicated that Google is mainly pushing Chromebooks in the enterprise market, yet its cloud-based Google Docs applications doesn't meet the needs of enterprise users. On a consumer front, Chromebooks become problematic for users who have a poor connection to the internet, or don't have a connection at all -- the "lite" cloud-based advantage suddenly becomes a huge disadvantage.
That said, it's no surprise that vendors aren't too keen on using Chrome OS as a major desktop platform. While many services and applications are indeed moving up into the cloud, the majority of the enterprise and consumer base hasn't quite shifted away from physical media even though cloud computing is the "trend of the future."

I am not necessarily suggesting going back to unlimited data bandwidth (although that would be nice) but 2GB a month for $30 is way over priced.
Yeah, lets forget about 90% of the worlds supercomputers and the millions of websites and servers which run Linux. Lets also forget about Android which is based on Linux and is the most used consumer mobile OS ahead of both WinMo7 and iOS combined. Yeah Linux will never be mainstream.
I am not necessarily suggesting going back to unlimited data bandwidth (although that would be nice) but 2GB a month for $30 is way over priced.
Yeah, lets forget about 90% of the worlds supercomputers and the millions of websites and servers which run Linux. Lets also forget about Android which is based on Linux and is the most used consumer mobile OS ahead of both WinMo7 and iOS combined. Yeah Linux will never be mainstream.
Agreed, linux wonderful for what it is and is everywhere... EXCEPT the desktop PC market. A huge hurtle is DirectX. Microsoft did a wonderful job of locking down the gaming market with dirextX, they're good at business.
What do?
Mac OS X
Sure looks like Mac OS X.
This is indeed the bottom line.
I will never switch from saving/accessing my programs or files to some cloud who knows where.
I prefer to have them on my own hard drive.
Need a copy of X or Y?
That's what backups are for.
i do...
most people use a computer for internet access, watching a youtube video, and maybe writing a document.
taking out windows would reduce pc cost by what 100$
so long as chrome os is a fully featured chrome browser, as in everything it can do in windows it can do in chrome, the vast majority of people can switch to it tomorrow and barely notice a difference.
if chrome os took it a step further and incorporated opengl, and google payed to make opengl versions of top games, chrome os may take off faster than a windows because im assuming chrome os is VERY light weight compared to a windows, and opengl wont force a 150-300$ upgrade to your pc ever (aside from graphics cards, but not an os)
Yes, ChromeOS could reduce the initial pc cost....but it far exceeds that initial cost in extra services that are required to make it usable. ChromeOS requires an internet connection.
Since Linux supports OpenGL and ChromeOS is linux based, it would be stupid for Google to remove OpenGL support.
i thought chrome os was the chrome browser but turned into an os...
you also have to read what i posted, most people are getting a computer for net use. they already have a net connection.
also i thought chrome os worked offline, it just doesnt sync till online.
So no thanks Cloud. I'd rather entrust my data to a 10 year old HDD at the brink of failure than any reliable cloud system. No data is pretty bad. But data in the wrong hands is far worse. And the wrong hands are all hands not my own.
One must remember two things, a free OS will not generate extra revenue for the vendor(in comparison to Windows)......and Microsoft Office has a monopoly in office enviroments, with few alternatives for sharepoint/onenote etc.