Intel to Invest $7 Billion in U.S. Facilities

Intel stated that it plans to invest $7 billion USD in U.S. manufacturing facilities as part of its 2-year plan to focus on leading-edge technologies.

The news of Intel's big spending spree comes directly from the mouth of Intel president and CEO, Paul Otellini. He states that the huge investment will fund the deployment of Intel's 32 nm manufacturing technology used to build faster, smaller chips that consumer less energy. And after the gloom and doom of recent weeks involving closures and layoffs, the company's new investment - its largest for a new manufacturing process so far - sounds like a breath of fresh air.

"We're investing in America to keep Intel and our nation at the forefront of innovation," Otellini said. "These manufacturing facilities will produce the most advanced computing technology in the world. The capabilities of our 32nm factories are truly extraordinary, and the chips they produce will become the basic building blocks of the digital world, generating economic returns far beyond our industry."

The spending begins with existing manufacturing sites located in Oregon, Arizona, and New Mexico. Reinvesting funds back into these facilities means high-wage, high skill jobs for 7,000 employees, adding to the 45,000 Intel workforce residing in the U.S. Currently more than 75 percent of Intel's sales are overseas, however 75 percent of the semiconductor manufacturing is right here in the States.

As reported earlier today, the first processors built using the 32 nm technology (32/billionth of a meter or about 1/millionth of an inch) will use the codename "Westmere," slated for desktop (Clarksdale) and mobile (Arrandale) mainstream systems. Apparently, the Westmere will combine Intel's Nahalem -its latest high-performance micro-architecture- with an integrated graphics/memory controller.

"Outstanding 32nm manufacturing and product health are enabling Intel to accelerate the Westmere production ramp beginning in 2009," said the company. "Additional 32nm products will follow in 2010."

7,000 new jobs sounds like a step in the right direction, and hopefully Americans will see this trend continue as the year unfolds. But even through Intel is investing a huge chunk of money, is now the right time as the economy continues to spiral downward? Time will only tell.

Create a new thread in the US News comments forum about this subject
This thread is closed for comments
14 comments
    Your comment
  • zibby
    Obama got them covered with stimulus package. Bringing jobs back here does not make financial sense for large corporations. Why pay 4 times more for salary when there is someone outside US that will do better job for less money, unless Uncle Sam (read Obama) will sponsor your expenses.
    -5
  • tenor77
    Quote:
    But even through Intel is investing a huge chunk of money, is now the right time as the economy continues to spiral downward?


    I would say yes. As much as I like AMD since they have the capital to weather this recession they can still invest in research and ventures like this so that when things get better they will have an even larger foothold.

    The company I work for is the same way. We're a market leader in every category, have a ton of capital and no debt and we're still growing and researching and not really cutting back other than backing down on production to adjust for demand. Personally I think it's smart.

    I do find it odd that they would bring production over to the US, though research has traditionally done here. Even so they can hire in cheap right now so it does help with cost.
    3
  • chris312
    Being afraid of the "economy" is a poor reason to make a decision on. If YOUR economy is ok (if you have enough emergency cash and little to no debt) then you have nothing to be worried about. People being afraid of a nebulous thing called the economy, which is somewhere else with other people, is the reason the economy goes up and down so wildly! We ARE the economy. It's up to the people to fix the economy. How would that happen if everyone were too afraid to do business anymore?
    3