Best offers
|
Windows 7 Home Premium Upgrade from... | $79.99 STAPLES More info |
|
Office 2007 Home and Student (Full... | $105.73 Royaldiscount.com More info |
|
Windows Anytime Upgrade Windows 7... | $139.99 STAPLES More info |
|
Windows 7 Professional (Upgrade) | $89.99 STAPLES More info |
|
Office 2007 Professional (Academic) | $123.94 Royaldiscount.com More info |
Benchmarking Windows 7: Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger?
Often hailed as the solution to Windows Vista performance problems, we wanted to know just how much better Windows 7 really is. We put one of our most recent test platforms through its paces to find out, benchmarking raw performance and responsiveness. Read More
-
Tom's Definitive Linux Software Roundup: Communications Apps
This is the second part of our Linux Software Roundup. Part one covered Internet Apps. Today we'll be looking at Communications Apps. This includes personal information managers, email clients, instant messengers, VoIP software, and IRC clients. Read More
-
How To: Windows XP Mode In...Ubuntu Linux?
Windows 7's XP Mode has already convinced many users who sat out for Vista to go out and upgrade. But will they buy the right version of Windows 7 to get XPM? You do know you can get the same XP functionality from a Linux distribution for free, right? Read More
Partners
The Games selection
violent :
Interactive Buddy
Unwind on your interactive buddy: Do anything you want to him, it will earn you money, and you can buy other stuff to torture him with.
|
crazy :
PC Breakdown
What is worst than a Fatal Error occuring during a game you did not save? Unleash your rage at your PC in this game. Blow it to pieces, it feels so...
|
Sponsored links
Activision Defends Modern Warfare 2 PC
Next news- Email |
- Print |
- Comments (175) |
- Share
PC gamer rage isn't worrying Activision too much.
With the news that the PC version of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 would lack dedicated servers, console commands, lean, and among many other features that were available in the first Modern Warfare, many PC gamers are unhappy with the 'dumbing down' of the sequel.
In fact, many of you have commented that you have cancelled your preorders in response to the design decisions made by Infinity Ward. But Activision, publisher of what will be one of the largest titles of the year, doesn't seem all that worried about the backlash from PC gamers.
"We're, of course, watching this very carefully and paying attention to it," Activision president Mike Griffith said in response to a financial analyst, as noted by Kotaku. "But we're not overly concerned about it."
"One of the problems with our PC SKUs in the past is that it has not been as friendly a consumer experience in terms of matchmaking and online play as the consoles have allowed it to be," he added. "Our solution here improves that consumer experience overall by a significant margin. And so we think that the benefits we will see are going to far outweigh any negatives that seem to be surfacing."
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 will be launching on November 11. Check out the launch trailer below.
Source : Tom's Hardware US
Sponsored links
Related articles
-
By Travis Meacham Maybe the gamer on your Christmas list is more of the creative type, and you'd like to get a gift that encourages their creative side and their love of games. If that's the case, the FPS Creator from Enteractive and The Game Creators could fit that bill perfectly. The FPS Creator is a program for PCs that allows users to create complete first-person shooter games without writing a single line of code. It uses a simple drag-and-drop interface consisting of a set of pre-fab objects - weapons, furniture and enemies - and a design space where game levels may be constructed. It takes a little getting used to, but with some patience and the manual's step-by-step instructions, your gamer will be off and creating in no time. FPS Creator is packed with potential, and tools to help you realize same. FPS Creator reminded me of the Neverwinter Nights Toolset that came with both NWN games. The interface is pretty similar, and both use an object-oriented, scripting-supported graphical interface. FPS Creator can only take a game-builder so far without doing some coding, though. While it can design levels, drop in pre-made enemies, configure some simple A.I. routines, and populate each level with weapons, objects and ammo, those who really want to get into the finer workings of game design, will have to learn some scripting. Thankfully, FPS Creator has an active forum attached to its website. It offers a multitude of tutorials on using this tool, scripting basics, and even entire scripts gamers can copy and paste to suit their needs. Bear in mind that these sorts of game-creation tools deliver only what builders put into them. Novices won't build something to rival Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare, but they might learn the basics of videogame design and level construction. Also, for anyone who's ever considered a career in game design, FPS Creator will give them a real taste of the work involved. This isn't a game unto itself, but it is an easy-to-use tool that introduces people to level design for first-person shooters. FPS Creator takes a little work, but creative types will find the results rewarding, and just might end up getting involved in a mod community when all is said and done.
-
Our test system for this article employs the Asrock 939 Dual SATA 2 motherboard, which is packed with an abundance of upgrade-oriented features. It supports native 8X AGP, PCI Express x16, single- and dual-core Socket 939 processors with dual-channel DDR memory, and even socket AM2 CPUs and DDR2 memory with a daughter board, which we used for testing. While searching online auction sites, we have seen people spending $200 or more for a Socket 939 Athlon 64 X2 4800+. It’s one of the fastest Socket 939 dual-core CPUs produced, but the device also represents a lot of money considering you can buy an even faster AM2 Athlon X2 for well under $100. Those stuck with Socket 939 will need to search the Web long and hard for a well-priced dual-core for their motherboard, but our AM2 compatible motherboard gives us the convenience of opting for an AM2 CPU with very little trouble and expense. We chose the following CPUs to examine the effects they have on gaming performance. First is the AMD Athlon 64 4000+. It’s base don the San Diego design, runs at 2.4 GHz, sports 1 MB L2 cache, and is one of the faster single-core desktop CPUs made. The direct comparison dual-core to this device is the AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ (2.4 GHz 1 MB cache per core). Next, we chose the AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200 + dual-core, which has a 2.2 GHz Manchester architecture with 512 KB L2 cache per core. The single-core direct comparison would be the A64 3500+, so our A64 4000+ should have an advantage both in clock speed and L2 cache in single-threaded applications. And lastly, the Athlon 64 X2 5600+ AM2 dual-core is a 2.8 GHz Windsor design with 1 MB L2 cache per core. With these three CPUs, we should get a good look at single- versus dual-core in gaming and have a good idea about how CPU clock speeds affect game play. Tested Hardware Motherboard Asrock 939 Dual SATA 2 Bios vs. P 2.30 Asrock AM2 CPU Board RAM 2 GB (2 * 1 GB) dual-channel Adata DDR 400 (3-3-3-8) for Socket 939 2 GB (2 *1GB) dual-channel Corsair DDR2 533 (4-4-4-12) for Socket AM2 Video Cards XFX GeForce 8800 GS 384 MB PCI Express 580MHz core/ 700(1400) MHz memory HIS Radeon HD 4850 512 MB PCI Express 625 MHz core/ 993 (1986) MHz memory Sound Card Creative SoundBlaster X-Fi Xtreme Audio Hard Drive Seagate Barracuda 250GB 7200 RPM 16 MB Cache SATA 3.0 Gb/s Power Supply Antec EarthWatts 430 W OS Windows XP Professional 32 bit Service Pack 2 Display Driver Nvidia ForceWare 174.74 AMD Catalyst 8.8 Benchmarks 3DMark05 v. 1.3.0 3DMark06 v. 1.1.0 F.E.A.R. v.1.08 Far Cry v.1.4 Need For Speed Carbon 1.4 Test Drive Unlimited 1.66A Oblivion 1.2 Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare 1.4 Crysis 1.2









still no dedicated server support
move along folks
What nonsense.
I canceled my preorder so you should be worried Activision. Don't take PC gamers for granted.
The hardcore gamers that were at first impressed by Infinity Ward are now dumbfounded. There goes our support, good luck with the casual gamer crowd and making auto-targeting the next big thing for MW3.
November 11? What happened to the 10th?
this game will fail
"One of the problems with our PC SKUs in the past is that it has not been as friendly a consumer experience in terms of matchmaking and online play as the consoles have allowed it to be,"
BS, are they telling us that because i think it the other way around. are they trying to see how fast they can ruin a game and piss of there customers?
I was actually planning on being competitive in this game (eg 8-10 hours per day) by entering tournaments, whilst simultaneously failing my classes. This is bullshit. The sole reason I built my new comp was so that I would only look to increase my skill and realize that if I lost, it was because the other person was better than me. I would then add that person to my list, learn their techniques, join a low-ping server, surpass them and own them. Now I have to worry about either of us having an advantage depending on who hosts??
You joke, but, Auto Targeting will come to the pc.
I really wish these game publishers would just come on out and and say it. " We don't care about PC gaming, the cash is in the consoles"
I played pretty hardcore way back with Medal of Honor and CoD + expansion and CoD2. I'd play clan matches where we would have to play on each others' servers. It was always an advantage to those who lived closest to the server, as there was always an advantage to the lower ping. In the old days, a kill was a kill, not a kill from calling in an air raid. I think I still have screenshots of my kill/loss being 108:7 and 56:0. I was seriously that good. Even if I had 80 ping and other people had 20 ping, I'd still do good, but my teammates wouldn't. So in the end, having a higher ping isn't that much of an advantage against great players, but against decent to good players, it's almost unfair.
K, so while I don't consider myself QUITE a hardcore gamer, I do think I'm pretty close and definitely far beyond casual. And while I do think limiting matches to 9v9 is lame, and I'm mildly disappointed about dedicated servers, I really don't understand why people are so upset over the lack of console commands. Maybe someone can explain how exactly they're so useful?
There's streamlining an interface to make it easier to use, then there's dumbing down the game.
We wouldn't be upset if they simply redesigned the browser for ease of use.
"But we're not overly concerned about it."
translation: "We don't care about what small niche gamers think about our games. As long as console versions make up bulk of sales, PC version can die for all we care."
WE don't want stupid console kids coming over and joining our good severs w/out knowing how to play the game.
the best games i bought from IF was Call of duty 1 and 2 but the rest isnt good enough. i download them
Seems everyone is jumping to conclusions about how this will all play out. Who's to say this won't streamline the online play and keep cheaters at bay better?
Don't worry, guys. They'll just blame lack of sales on Pirates.
Little do they know, I Ninja my software now!
WE don't want stupid console kids coming over and joining our good severs w/out knowing how to play the game.
Sure we do.. easy kills :-) Besides, They don't want people cry when they get owned, hence their matchmaking system.
"But we're not overly concerned about it."translation: "We don't care about what small niche gamers think about our games. As long as console versions make up bulk of sales, PC version can die for all we care."
*sigh* I'm prolly gonna get bashed for this, but here goes. How can we expect developers and publishers to make games that cater to a hardcore audience if it's not profitable? I keep hearing people bash publishers because they are only motivated by money, but what else do we expect them to be motivated by?
The publishers WILL go where the money is, but that's also where the people are. We're seeing a trend of more games catering to casual gamers because the audience of casual gamers FAR outnumbers hardcore gamers...there's just no way around it and I have a hard time believing that the collective bitching and moaning of the relatively small hardcore gaming community can do much about it.
What worries me the most is how Activision can calmy say something along the lines of "We're not concerned about it." This is the same as saying "We hear you, and we don't care. We KNOW what we're doing. We don't need YOUR input."
This act of defense is nothing more than a cowardly cold shoulder to the community.
We dont give a damn about your "match making". We want dedicated server support, period.
Good thing I'm not a MW or COD enthusiast. I dropped them a long time ago when they dragged the WWII era gaming through the ground every year. So many things I dislike about the company even though the gaming experience is moderate. Game developers seem to have put themselves on a pedestal in the last decade. Correct me if I'm wrong but you are only dollar signs to the Developers and Publishers nowadays. Valve is one of the select few who have absorbed the community into there company and not just used there loyal followers.
If only more people Devs and Pubs could see us for more then dollar signs perhaps we could have some real innovation in the future instead of repeating the classic games from the 90's and early millennium over and over with new weapons and fancy pantsy graphics on new colorful maps. How many times can you repeat the same title under a new name?
So much fail on so many levels. Has activision or IW ever played an FPS on a PC? I'm guessing not, otherwise they would know just how bad of an idea locally hosted games are.
I look forward to IW/Activision crying about their poor PC sales and then blaming it on piracy or customer misunderstanding/incompetence.
"We're, of course, watching this very carefully and paying attention to it," Activision president Mike Griffith said.........
I say SCREW YOU GREEDBAG !!!
i won't be buying this game nor will i be pirating it.I have a lot better games to play than this dumbed down piece of crud.
"We're, of course, watching this very carefully and paying attention to it," Activision president Mike Griffith said in response to a financial analyst, as noted by Kotaku. "But we're not overly concerned about it."
They don't really care about PC gamers.. I think this is a test to see how it will effect their overall bottom line. Face it, the majority of the sales went to consoles with COD:MW and now they believe they don't need to make any more games specifically for PC. Hence this port.. minimal expense to switch it to PC and if it doesn't work out, then oh well. That is why they are watching this and they are not concerned.
I wouldn't be surprised to see the next installment of the COD series a console only game.
I do not need this game.. I need oxygen, food and water.. but not this game. I wont be buying it, not even out of curiosity. I will take my money and spend it on other things.. maybe a game from one of their competitors.
So, fine.. your not concerned... neither am I. I will still be playing games, just not yours.
Have a nice day IW,
A former customer
They'll be overly concerned in about 120 Hours...
I will pirate this game.
Well look on the bright side, now that they are giving the go ahead to cheat and glitch by not allowing dedicated servers, take advantage of it!!
More cheating occurs on these match making servers they provide. The cheating also goes on much longer then that of a dedicated server where an admin is almost always available in some form.
up up down down left right left right ftw
No dedicated server support?
Think I'll just wait for the hacked version and play single player and continue to play COD: modern warfare (1st one) and COD: World at war online.
I hope Activision can delay PC version badly.
Some people should get fired because of this.