AMD's 'Shanghai' CPU Enters Production

The last year has not been kind to AMD. Its 65nm Barcelona processors arrived several months late, and were already obsolete in many ways when compared to the Intel offerings at the time. To make matters worse, the Barcelona chips were also buggy, making the tardy offering even less desirable to consumers and PC manufacturers. All of this built up to AMD’s $1.2 Billion loss in Q2 of 2008, the same quarter Intel saw record-breaking gains.

Now, in an effort to right itself in the CPU market, AMD has begun manufacturing its next generation of processors. Shanghai, a 45nm quad core processor, will be available by the end of 2008, beating original expectations. As per its usual strategy, Shanghai will be available in server processors first, followed shortly by desktop varieties.

In order to gain ground on Intel in performance, these new Shanghai based chips will have three times more cache (6MB total) than previous processors, as well as the third iteration of HyperTransport. AMD claims these additions will boost performance by as much as 20 percent while lowering power consumption. Following the release of the Shanghai processors, the 45nm Deneb desktops processors will hit store shelves in early 2009, followed by Istanbul server processors (six-cores) later in the year.

This could be the boost AMD needs to stay competitive with the house that Moore built, but how will these new offerings compare to the six-core Xeon processors already shipping from Intel as well as the Core i7 chips expected later this year? Only time will tell.

Check out AMD’s full plan for most of 2009 right here in an earlier report.

Create a new thread in the US News comments forum about this subject
This thread is closed for comments
30 comments
    Your comment
  • "the house that Moore built" lol, N1
    1
  • Well its nice to hear that is AMD doing good. They had so much trouble lately its about time something good happens. I am not sure if AMD's year 2009's processors will be able to compete with Intel's core i7 processors, but i sure hope they will =) It worries me because "Nahalem" will be able to self overclock and such, and intel is thinking about making 32nm processors. It is totaly unbiased comment, I pick my components based on performance
    1
  • I don't really see producing a new processor as necessarily doing good. They're just... well... doing really. How good they're doing will be seen once the benchmarks arrive. There are a million things that can still poison the well to this point, so don't count your chickens just yet. I road the AMD wave just like a lot of you in the late 90s to early 21st century... but I have to be honest and say that I think their success is greatly due to the fault of Intel and the poor NetBurst architecture that they road on the whole time. Now that that's the past and since Core 2 has been in... it might not be out of bounds to think that AMD might never really compete again in the CPU market. Not the way it has in the past.
    -1