Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Intel and HP Lead Battle Against Conflict Minerals

By - Source: Enough Project

For the second time, the Enough Project has listed technology companies for their effort to avoid conflict minerals in their products.

The ranking is designed to highlight and reward those companies that take pro-active steps to recognize the problems of conflict minerals originating from the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. Just like the much more publicized conflict diamonds, conflict minerals cause in-humane working conditions, violence and exploitation.

According to the Enough Project, Intel comes out on top with a score of 60 out of a possible 100. HP follows with 54 and Philips with 48. Other companies that were recognized for auditing their supply chain, participate in industry-wide initiatives against conflict minerals and help Congo to clean up their trade environment include Sandisk (48), AMD (44), RIM (42), Acer (40), dell (40), Apple (38), Microsoft (38), Motorola (35), Nokia (35), and Panasonic (33).

Companies such as IBM, LG, Samsung, Sony, Toshiba and Lenovo are further behind and are in the beginning phases of considering a stronger commitment against conflict minerals. The Enough Project chastised Canon, Nikon, Sharp, HTC and especially Nintendo as the lowest ranked company for doing "next to nothing" to avoid conflict minerals. According to the project organizers, Nintendo has been unresponsive to repeated outreach efforts, did not investigate its supply chains, and does not participate in a program "to source clean minerals from Congo."


Contact Us for News Tips, Corrections and Feedback

There are 26 Comments. B
Top Comments
  • 20
    Branden , August 18, 2012 9:06 AM
    aqualiptWhy? because they want to make profit out people like every other company in this world?

    because they are knowingly and willingly turning a blind eye to the poor conditions, violence and exploitation they are indirectly supporting, that's why.
  • 14
    kcorp2003 , August 18, 2012 8:39 AM
    even if you stop the "Conflict Minerals". i'm sure some other middle man will buy it from Congo and sell it back to intel, HP, etc.. for 10x more.

    btw shame on you Nintendo.
  • 11
    southernshark , August 18, 2012 9:12 AM
    This is meaningless.

    Any company that partakes in the market place raises the price of conflict minerals. Its like the price of oil. It does not matter who you buy it from, it only matters if you don't buy it.

    I am not saying there is an alternative, but to suggest they have done something is false.
Other Comments
  • 20
    Branden , August 18, 2012 9:06 AM
    aqualiptWhy? because they want to make profit out people like every other company in this world?

    because they are knowingly and willingly turning a blind eye to the poor conditions, violence and exploitation they are indirectly supporting, that's why.
  • 14
    kcorp2003 , August 18, 2012 8:39 AM
    even if you stop the "Conflict Minerals". i'm sure some other middle man will buy it from Congo and sell it back to intel, HP, etc.. for 10x more.

    btw shame on you Nintendo.
  • 11
    southernshark , August 18, 2012 9:12 AM
    This is meaningless.

    Any company that partakes in the market place raises the price of conflict minerals. Its like the price of oil. It does not matter who you buy it from, it only matters if you don't buy it.

    I am not saying there is an alternative, but to suggest they have done something is false.
Display more comments