Ads
Ads
All about Software
 Latest Software articles
Benchmarking Windows 7: Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger?

Benchmarking Windows 7: Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger?
Often hailed as the solution to Windows Vista performance problems, we wanted to know just how much better Windows 7 really is. We put one of our most recent test platforms through its paces to find out, benchmarking raw performance and responsiveness. Read More

  • How To: Windows XP Mode In...Ubuntu Linux?
    Windows 7's XP Mode has already convinced many users who sat out for Vista to go out and upgrade. But will they buy the right version of Windows 7 to get XPM? You do know you can get the same XP functionality from a Linux distribution for free, right? Read More
All Software articles

Newsletters


  • Ask your question about IT issues
  • Post

Partners

The Games selection

violent : Interactive Buddy Unwind on your interactive buddy: Do anything you want to him, it will earn you money, and you can buy other stuff to torture him with.
crazy : PC Breakdown What is worst than a Fatal Error occuring during a game you did not save? Unleash your rage at your PC in this game. Blow it to pieces, it feels so...
Ads

Sponsored links

New Mac Ad Attacks Entire Windows Lineage

Next news
12:10 PM - October 23, 2009 by Jane McEntegart

Microsoft launched Windows 7 yesterday, and along with it a pretty neat ad for its I'm a PC campaign. However, Apple also released a new commercial yesterday.

Below is Apple's newly released commercial entitled, "Empty Promises." It seems that simply updating its notebook and desktop line in the same week as the Windows 7 launch wasn't enough for Apple, as the company's latest commercial aims to take Microsoft down a peg by reminding customers of days gone by.

Justin Long doesn't even mention Apple once. He just stands there while John Hodgman points out that there have been issues with every single Windows OS, going right back to Windows 2.

Check out the video below and let me know what you think.

Broken Promises

Source : Tom's Hardware US

Talkback
Add your comment
joshthor 10/23/2009 6:17 PM
Hide
-20+

i dont like apples marketing campain. sure, all windows os' have had problems. but they are computers. all apple os' have had problems too. windows 7 is solely about polish. its gotten great reviews from everything ive seen, it runs very fast, very smooth and is very pretty.

Anonymous 10/23/2009 6:18 PM
Hide
-20+

I wonder if Apple fans realize what this type of attack makes them look like... cuz Im sure that none of those iterations of Windows ever influenced ANY of apple's design choices... no, none of them....... dicks.

lightsaber 10/23/2009 6:18 PM
Hide
-20+

Apple is just jealous of Microsoft....everyone knows if it was not for the Ipod Apple would be a non-factor today. All hail Microsoft!!!

Nik_I 10/23/2009 6:20 PM
Hide
-20+

I love how apple goes and attackes every version of windows ever made, like they've always put out consistently good operating systems. I'm sorry, but OS9 was way behind the times, and was quite buggy. Apple really needs to stop with these sad attempts.

jj463rd 10/23/2009 6:22 PM
Hide
-20+

Windows 2? I think they mean Windows 286 or Windows 386 (I have both in the retail boxes).Apple is grasping at straws with futility here with Windows 7.

ssalim 10/23/2009 6:22 PM
Hide
-20+

It never ends!

wildwell 10/23/2009 6:23 PM
Show
ssalim 10/23/2009 6:25 PM
Hide
-20+

How are they empty promises if the OS has been used and liked by many users and not just internal testers even before the release?

tayb 10/23/2009 6:27 PM
Hide
-3+

Okay. I don't care what your preferences are, that was funny.

fulle 10/23/2009 6:32 PM
Hide
-20+

wildwell :
Stop taking a company's TV advertisements personally, suckers. Do you guys back Mc Donald's against Carl's Jr. advertising too? I hope the new TV ads by both Microsoft and Apple spur strong sales for both companies as they are both major components in my 401k.



At least Carl's Jr puts on display their actual product in their ads, instead of just spending the entire time bashing the competition.

Anonymous 10/23/2009 6:39 PM
Hide
-20+

Haha, that commercial did at least make me laugh. It's true that PC users expect there to be some issues that will eventually be patched, despite claims to the contrary. With Apple the issues come as a surprise to their users, are usually significant (e.g. exploding iPhones, deleted data,) and users are lucky if Apple even acknowledges the issue let alone fixes it ¬_¬

archigos 10/23/2009 6:40 PM
Hide
-6+

Yep, agreed. Funny ad. To give opinion, it was one of the weaker ads I've seen by Apple. I do agree that we need to keep ourselves in check and not get so worked up about ads and things like them. It's marketing, that's the way it goes. Apple is marketing their products, Microsoft is marketing theirs. Pick what works best for you and roll with it. Friendly competition? Sure! I wouldn't say some of the comments left here are in that spirit though. Just food for thought.

doc70 10/23/2009 6:40 PM
Hide
-7+

that's what I was expecting from Apple; no lesson learned about anything, just more bitching about the competition.

Can not even begin to compare this ad with the one from MS ...

Just a minor point: if the Mac OS would have been so flawless, why do we have so many versions of it? Unless they were trying to fix and improve on some problems of their own...

Stupid ad.

matchboxmatt 10/23/2009 6:41 PM
Hide
-2+

ahahahahahahahahha

dreamphantom_1977 10/23/2009 6:44 PM
Hide
-12+

That was retarded. Does apple really accept to get market share off this commercial? Apple might not have as many problems, but it's because it's such a limited operating system. It's all about compatibility, as compatibility increases, software conflicts occur. Apple is a limited operating system. If you left windows stock the way it is, without people downloading tons of programs, and just used the features built in, like they do on an apple, then windows would run just as well as apple. Even vista.

Windows is for experimenters, modders, geeks, gamers, and anyone else who likes to "tinker". Apple is more for people who only use the computer for "work" purposes, like doing taxes and photoshop or video editing. Not that it's better at it, people who buy apples just don't really care about doing anything else on there computers, and just choose apple cuz it isn't as prone to virus or hacker attacks. But lets be honest with ourselves, apple is limited. That why "most people" buys windows based pc's Cuz most people like to tinker and customize and make windows more like our home. Anyone who uses a computer as much as i do, would get bored using an apple based computer.

Well, thats my opinion anyways.

captaincharisma 10/23/2009 6:44 PM
Hide
-18+

lol "its not going to have the problems windows ME had"

i also seen the one with that biatch saying she is moving to mac to avoid all the headaches. man wait till she sees snow leopard deleting all her photos :)

captaincharisma 10/23/2009 6:45 PM
Hide
-2+

jj463rd :
Windows 2? I think they mean Windows 286 or Windows 386 (I have both in the retail boxes).Apple is grasping at straws with futility here with Windows 7.



you think thats bad i found an OEM copy of windows ME that was never opened (and never will be ) :)

96stangman 10/23/2009 6:46 PM
Hide
-13+

yep that shows why mac is the number one computer company in the world....... wait a minuet windows has 90 percent of computers ???

Anonymous 10/23/2009 6:47 PM
Hide
-5+

Steve dude, Windows marketshare > 90%, Mac OS X < 10%. TRUST ME!!!11!!

foody 10/23/2009 6:48 PM
Hide
-3+

I don't think Apple realizes that every OS that ever has been and ever will be has had problems. The entire point of releasing a new OS or updating it is because they have problems or room to improve. It's pretty obvious to me that Mac has problems and has a lot of room to improve. They have released 7 versions of the same OS since the beta in 2002, and if I'm not mistaken, those 7 versions were released to fix problems and improve. Apple doesn't seem to mind being slightly hypocritical in their ads as long as their users don't generally think about what they hear in them.

Also I don't recall anyone saying that Windows Vista was meant to fix any problems that XP had excluding security maybe. It was meant to be an upgrade that offered more. Microsoft is more into improving Windows with new OS's and fixing problems with free service packs and upgrades unlike Apple which charges for their update packages. There's a reason Microsoft dominates the computer market. You can only teach an old dog so many tricks before it dies.

dheadley 10/23/2009 6:49 PM
Hide
-1+

You all take it way too seriously, I'm a Vista 64 user on my way to Windows 7 64 but I think the clip is humorous and to be honest it is completely true. They never say they don't have their own problems they are just pointing out that all the hoopla over Windows 7 is the same as over every previous version.

I've used Windows 7 beta and I will be ditching Vista for it real soon on all three desktops in our home with a family pack, but that doesn't change the fact that I still remember my top 100 computer horror stories all deal with some flavor of Windows giving me errors, blue screening, not running programs correctly after a service release and making me visit driver hell more times than I care to remember.

I still use it everyday, but it definitely a love-hate relationship.

sdcaliceli 10/23/2009 6:51 PM
Hide
-6+

Too bad OSX sucked up until around 2002-3. That's where the commercial should've stopped.

MustWarnOthers 10/23/2009 6:54 PM
Hide
-0+

I thought it was clever, except for the fact that when he gets to Windows XP, he should stop. Since when has Windows XP been known to be unreliable? It's first week of release?

The Mac operating system for the past few years hasn't had any major face lift (not that it's dying for one), so the last updates have merely been revisions.

That's not to say that Microsoft's attempts at redesigning the wheel are always reliable or smart, but Windows changes from version to version have been significant overhauls.

osxsier 10/23/2009 6:56 PM
Hide
-5+

I like Windows 7, but I think Apple is very clever in marketing to the ignorant masses. The average person does not read sites like Toms Hardware and don't know the difference between ram and hard drive capacity. They think both are memory. So for those people, Apple is being very smart and playing to their fears.

rocman3001 10/23/2009 6:58 PM
Hide
-6+

It's marketing alright - and borderline logical fallacy at that.

This would be like Toyota running an ad where they show Honda's cars from the past few decades throughout the ENTIRE commercial. All the while, the voiceover would say things like "Honda's cars from the 80s would fail today's frontal impact test miserably", "Honda's cars back then also didn't have side curtain airbags" or "Honda's cars back then just sucked".

And then at the 29th second of the 30 second commercial, the Toyota logo would flash onto the screen.

Logically, this doesn't say jack about the performance of Toyota's cars. It just points out the bad stuff about Honda from Toyota's point of view (not necessarily the consumers).

megamanx00 10/23/2009 7:00 PM
Hide
-5+

Ouch... and yet I can't stop laughing.

Of course windows 95 was a big improvement over 3.1 and was way more useful. Win 98 had alot less problems than 95, but then come ME and that is really what really makes the joke. Well that and the horrible experience a few people had with the release version of Vista.

Problems from the win 9x series are really the result of bad coding practices at Microsoft. The trouble with XP was that it had to support software written with those bad coding practices and Vista, which was built with good coding practices, had to be patched continuously to support old programs that had bad code.

Win 7 is a step in the right direction as it uses an XP VM to run older programs rather than trying to replicate buggy behavior to support older programs. I really wish MS would take a page from apple though and simply not patch the OS just to run buggy code. With apple, if your code doesn't run on their new OS your SOL and that's it. We this with their major transitions especially going from OS 9 to OS 10.

Anonymous 10/23/2009 7:02 PM
Show
Delusion77 10/23/2009 7:04 PM
Hide
-1+

all i have to say is 93% market share.

moejoe4420 10/23/2009 7:05 PM
Hide
-3+

First, for disclosure, I own both. The ad is certainly pithy and most people who've experienced nonsense with every version of Windows will identify. Wasn't that the point? MAC's have had issues as well but nothing remotely close to the havoc of Windows. Most people aren't aware of MAC problems because the market share is so small. XP Pro has been the best of all the versions I've owned starting with WIN386. I like it for games. Sorry guys, for business I use MAC because mine has NEVER, EVER crashed or had malware. I'll try 7 if gamers find it reliable with the games I have.

dman3k 10/23/2009 7:06 PM
Hide
-3+

ROFL. Kettle calling the pot black on that one...

Drag0nR1der 10/23/2009 7:08 PM
Hide
-3+

wow, that advert just seems desperate... I do like how the windoes adverts show people out in the world doing things, and mac adverts have two people in a white box cut off from anything, with no context, no life, no personality (either of them)... it's somehow fitting


Sponsored links

Related articles

  • Alan: That’s a great point. I recently submitted a request to Apple to allow selective file sharing policy on my notebook. Its fine to have file sharing enabled when I’m at home, but when I’m at a coffee shop or other public access point, I hate having to manually disable file sharing. Dino: I really like Apple’s Network Locations feature for network configuration and I would also like it if I could associate my network security settings with it also. Windows Vista actually has a good system for this by letting the user identify networks they connect to as “Public,” “Private,” or “Work.” Alan: Earlier this year, Steve Balmer talked about Microsoft's investigation of Webkit and ultimate decision to stick with Trident. Web developers would love to have more consistent rendering engines, but from a security standpoint, does it make sense to standardize around one set of code? That is, last year's MacOS exploit and the iPhone exploit were both breaches in the same underlying Javascript code. Since IE8, Firefox, Chrome, and Safari use different Javascript engines, a single exploit wouldn't be able to target all of them. Or, do you think standardization is better because you can collectively pool your resources to develop more secure code? Dino: While standardization helps create a more secure single standard, it means that any breach of it will be highly applicable to Internet systems. I believe that more diversity in computer systems helps strengthen the ecosystem against attack. Having many diverse targets decreases the profitability of malware and once it ceases being profitable, there will be much less of it. Alan: If you had to make a recommendation: Mac, PC, or Linux?  Or do you find them to be equally (in)secure? Dino: For most consumers and home users, I recommend a Mac because they are currently targeted less by Web malware. They also tend to be easier to use so I get less tech support calls. If a user is slightly more technical and/or adventurous, I recommend that they give Ubuntu Linux a try. I recommend Windows Vista for businesses because it is a more secure operating system and better suited towards management in the enterprise. Alan: Any reason for Ubuntu specifically (full disclosure: I run Fedora on my Linux workstations)? Dino: I have found Ubuntu to be more user-friendly and I personally prefer Debian-based Linux distributions to the others. But I don’t want to start any religious wars here. Alan: For our Windows-based PC users, what are some tips for running a "secure" PC? What about our Mac users? Linux users? Dino: PC users should move to Vista or Windows 7 as soon as possible to make use of their security features. Mac users should do the same with Snow Leopard. Linux users are already pretty well served by the leading desktop distributions, so they shouldn't need to take many additional precautions. For all of these operating systems, the National Security Agency (NSA) Systems and Network Attack Center (SNAC) freely publishes in-depth secure configuration guides that can be followed to further harden your operating system environment. (Ed.: the NSA’s guidelines can be found here)

  • Apple’s former ad slogan of “Think Different” isn’t entirely accurate. While Apple is challenging consumers to make the switch away from the most popular operating system in the world, the Apple world is one of conformity. Once you decide to play in the Apple sandbox, you are stuck in the Apple sandbox. I can only buy a notebook in two colors: aluminum and white. I can’t buy a 2.0 GHz Macbook with a lighted keyboard or a MacBook Pro with an aluminum unibody design and a matte screen. I can’t buy a laptop with eSATA or an iMac with a Core 2 Quad or a monitor-less Mac with a Core 2 Duo and an Nvidia GPU. If I go with Apple, I have to play under Apple’s rules. On the other hand, the Apple Kool-Aid is mighty tasty. The iPod and iPhone have been the gateway drugs to the Mac ecosystem and philosophy. Both represent highly structured environments. By giving up the flexibility to load music directly onto your iPod or to use exotic formats such as FLAC or APE, you gain the ease of use that an iPod offers and the widespread support of automotive manufacturers where integrating your iPod with your steering wheel controls requires no trickery. The same is true with the iPhone. You get one provider: AT&T. You only get one form factor. But in turn, you get one of the best smart phones on the market. The strengths of a Mac are clear. On the consumer side, iLife remains one of the best consumer multimedia suites ever produced. For years, iLife’s photo slide show capabilities have outclassed anything available on the PC with regard to ease-of-use and the ability to produce fully animated menus. Apple Aperture offers a great alternative to Adobe Lightroom 2 for a lower price while Apple Shake and Final Cut Pro Studio represent true Hollywood-grade applications falling short only of products from Autodesk/discreet. Built-in capabilities to the operating system such as Time Machine make data security a breeze. Keynote remains one of the most sophisticated presentation tools available on the market, and as soon as Pages and Numbers have support for EndNote and Error Bars, I’m confident that the Mac will gain even more traction in the scientific/academic world. Given the option between a PC that can only run Microsoft-branded software and a Mac that can only run Apple-branded software, the easy answer is the Mac (although admittedly, I am using Office 2008 to write this). Even the day-to-day Mac experience is pleasant. When comparing an eight-core system running Windows Vista/Aero, Mac OS X, and Xgl/Compiz; there is no question that Mac OS X offers the subjective feeling of a snappier interface. I’m not sure what it is about Mac OS X that makes it so responsive, but the last system to have the same level of responsiveness was my SGI Octane. The only similarity between Mac OS X and SGI IRIX was the use of Display PDF/Display Postscript and a closed system with tightly controlled hardware support. Vista/Aero may be slower because non-WPF windows are rendered in 2D (even though the composition is 3D), and Linux driver support lags behind Windows and Mac OS X (DRI2 may change things). In addition, recent benchmarks show that Mac OS X offers superior power management compared to Windows Vista (Anandtech), and in general, offers superior raw performance to Ubuntu Linux (Phoronix). With Mac OS X, you get style and substance.

  • The choice of an operating system continues to be task-driven. Linux offers power users absolute control over all aspects of their PC, yet it still needs a focused desktop release that is not geared for “Linux for the Desktop,” but instead serves as an operating system focused on the consumer goals of office productivity, Web surfing, music, movies, and photos. Mac OS X continues to find new enthusiasts who want a system that “just works.” It’s a true testament of the underlying NeXTSTEP design from 1989, bringing both UNIX capabilities and candy-coated Apple goodness. There’s no reason you can’t run a stripped-down Mac OS X system that loads xterm at launch and acts as a pure X terminal other than the fact that native Mac OS X is compelling enough. Finally, despite all the naysayers, Windows continues to be the dominant platform for desktop computing. Microsoft’s commitment to the Windows 7 project is recognition that the company is aware of its missteps with Vista and research on Singularity/Midori continues. Microsoft isn’t about to let its dominance fade without a fight. It’s an exciting time for technology enthusiasts. September 2008 Worldwide Market Share (source: Net Applications) PC: 90.3% Mac: 8.23% Linux: 0.91% Alan’s Prediction for September 2009 PC: 87.1% Mac: 11.2% Linux: 1.0%