Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No
Ads

Windows 7 Usage Passes All Versions of Mac OS X

by - source: Tom's Hardware US

Windows 7 users outnumbering those on Macs.

The overwhelming majority of the market uses Microsoft Windows, so it should come as no surprise that Windows usage this past weekend was higher than that of Mac OS X. The interesting stat, however, was that Windows 7 usage surpassed all versions of Mac OS X combined.

According to tracking firm Net Applications, Windows 7 commanded an average of 5.07 percent usage last Saturday and Sunday. The growing slice of market share was enough to move past the 5 percent that Apple held across all its current versions of OS X for that week.

"It's safe to say that Windows 7's daily share did peak above Mac's weekly share," said Vince Vizzaccaro, executive vice president at Net Applications, according to Computerworld.

Looking at Window 7's full week average, which started out lower than numbers attained over the weekend, Mac OS X still led ahead by nearly a percentage point. Windows 7's week averaged at 4.15 percent usage. Vizzaccaro believes that the growth of Windows 7 will mean that it'll soon leave OS X behind.

"Certainly, the trend line shows Windows 7 will surpass Mac share soon," he predicted.

Follow us on Twitter for more tech news and exclusive updates here.

Share:
99
Comments
Read more
X
Submit

Comments
Add your comment
rpmrush 11/25/2009 10:54 PM
Hide
-20+

Yup, have been using it. I'm surprised it's not higher. As soon as businesses start adopting it, Win 7 will sky rocket.

MrBradley 11/25/2009 10:54 PM
Show
rippleyhakd 11/25/2009 11:03 PM
Hide
-20+

Took a month, to pass ALL MAC OS X.. Impressive considering that this is still a new OS, that WIN7 has not even began a corporation rollout, (still have IT people learning it), AND on top of that, NEW machines with the OS are just not becoming more and more prevalent. And this is >1 year penetration from apple. Fanboys just make my day..

city_zen 11/25/2009 11:11 PM
Hide
-12+

Vista's next (currently, Vista: 18% - Win 7: 5 %)

waikano 11/25/2009 11:26 PM
Hide
-2+

No surprise really, People don't want Vista and 7 is the first decent choice of Windows since XP. And that was 8 years ago. How long did it take Vista to reach that achievement? Anyone?

waikano 11/25/2009 11:28 PM
Hide
-5+
tpi2007 11/25/2009 11:38 PM
Hide
-19+

Christmas is coming... within a month OS X will be far behind.

kartu 11/25/2009 11:42 PM
Show
warmon6 11/26/2009 12:05 PM
Hide
-16+

Now what was that apple about pc users switching to macs? this seams to prove them wrong. :lol:

hakesterman 11/26/2009 12:07 PM
Hide
-20+

People didn't want Vista because it got a unfair bad name early. I've had Vista for three years and it has done an outstanding job for me. It crashes far less than XP did, it was easier to use than Xp and it has more options than XP. Windows 7 is just a deluxe version of Vista, most of the Vista drivers work in Windows 7 because it is Vista deluxe. The media couldn't bad mouth Windows 7 enough this time to keep it down because everyone has worn tired of Xp. So when you fire up your new Windows 7 just think you could of had this two years ago if you didn't listen to all the negative crap and just tried it.

7amood 11/26/2009 12:07 PM
Hide
-12+

kartu :
So, what does it make "a decent choice" again? Is it again "much faster"?


not faster but... to be honest, as I jump from XP to 7 I can finally say that I have something new to look at.

p05esto 11/26/2009 12:12 PM
Hide
-7+

Vista 64 is rock solid for me, just a powerhouse. I have no bugs or complaints at all with it (once I disabled UAC anyhow). I like Vista better than Win 7 at the moment...the start menu and lack of the classic interface is a biggie for me, I just like the simplicity better. Why did Win 7 remove that? I don't get it, couldn't have been that big of a deal to offer a choice in that regard.

wira020 11/26/2009 12:14 PM
Hide
-6+

kartu :
So, what does it make "a decent choice" again? Is it again "much faster"?



Why does people compare a very slim n basic OS to a full blown functional (more features) , flashy yet still in the slim margin, better and beautifully done OS in speed??? Win 7 is better and only lose in term of boot up times ( a few seconds wont make u feel any different) ... get over it...

nicklasd87 11/26/2009 12:16 PM
Hide
-20+

I have been nothing but impressed with Windows 7. It still has yet to crash from a problem unrelated to over clocking. It even survived moving the boot partition from my spare drive to my main drive (installed where my old vista partition was). The only sad thing I can think of is my Dad just went out and bought a 13" MAC...I feel like I have failed as a son...oh well, his loss.

p05esto 11/26/2009 12:24 PM
Hide
-6+

Poor guy nicklas87, I feel for you.

powerbaselx 11/26/2009 12:35 PM
Show
3ul 11/26/2009 1:10 AM
Show
rockstone1 11/26/2009 1:13 AM
Hide
--3+

3ul :
You are talking bullsh1t...



Bullsh1t isn't the word... insanity is. This IS news.

tipoo 11/26/2009 1:21 AM
Hide
-4+

I have now contributed to 4 of those windows 7 installations, what about you guys?

sylvia648 11/26/2009 1:42 AM
Hide
-0+

One install, but more to come once I buy some spare buys after the new year. Might get that cheapo laptop from Best buy on black Friday though, and that has windows 7 on it.

youngpeter 11/26/2009 1:51 AM
Hide
-2+

I installed Win 7 Pro (x64) on a new ASUS mobo this week, so far flawless. I installed it today on an HP Laptop, excellent. It's cool to watch it find drivers, set up printers, etc. The laptop has never worked better. The ASUS desktop is a joy to use. Win 7 is going to go down in history, that's for certain.

Anonymous 11/26/2009 2:47 AM
Show
ubergeek 11/26/2009 3:13 AM
Hide
-1+

tipoo :
I have now contributed to 4 of those windows 7 installations, what about you guys?


I have added a 64-bit 7 Ultimate that doubles as a hackintosh. So is that +1 for Win7 and -1 for osx? Would this box be considered a Wackintosh7?

oicw 11/26/2009 3:19 AM
Hide
-9+

kartu :
So, what does it make "a decent choice" again? Is it again "much faster"?



Got news for you: my Pentium 75 overclocked to 120 mhz can boot up Windows3.1 in 4 seconds flat! How fast is your XP?

C'mon, give it a break. Windows 7 is pretty darn fast considering how much more advanced it is than XP.

Caffeinecarl 11/26/2009 3:37 AM
Hide
-1+

Already have two copies of Windows 7, picking up a 3 pack soon to get my other machines on board!

I'm SE7ENIZED!

randomizer 11/26/2009 3:46 AM
Hide
-1+

7amood :
not faster but... to be honest, as I jump from XP to 7 I can finally say that I have something new to look at.


I hope you didn't buy a new OS just for the looks. There are plenty of other OSs you could have bought in the meantime if you wanted something new to look at. Personally I'd prefer an OS that was completely invisible because the OS doesn't help me get work done, the applications do.

This is an unsurprising piece of news. It was going to happen, it was just a matter of how long before it happened. I will never get over that picture of Ballmer.

tipoo 11/26/2009 3:59 AM
Hide
-0+

ubergeek :
I have added a 64-bit 7 Ultimate that doubles as a hackintosh. So is that +1 for Win7 and -1 for osx? Would this box be considered a Wackintosh7?



No sir, that is called awesome.

Well almost, just throw Ubuntu on there as well.

rooseveltdon 11/26/2009 4:33 AM
Hide
-6+

beillobab :
What a ridiculous article. Of course it outnumbers Mac OS X users. With the number of different manufacturers shipping Windows 7 with no other choice. The number of users does equate to quality of either operating system. Microsoft is lucky Apple doesn't release OS X for use on any computer. If users had a choice, the numbers would be totally different.



If apple ever released their OS to every manufacturer,they would have bugs and driver issues and due to the increased numbers they would become targets of hackers who for the most part are familiar with the unix like structure of OS X to begin with (os x is actually easier to hack into than windows)in other words they would lose their advantage in every way and pretty much be destroyed by microsoft which has already estabilished its foot hold and has been dealing with these issues for years....the problem with mac fan boys is that they think they know.......but they really don't.

captaincharisma 11/26/2009 4:42 AM
Hide
-1+

p05esto :
Vista 64 is rock solid for me, just a powerhouse. I have no bugs or complaints at all with it (once I disabled UAC anyhow). I like Vista better than Win 7 at the moment...the start menu and lack of the classic interface is a biggie for me, I just like the simplicity better. Why did Win 7 remove that? I don't get it, couldn't have been that big of a deal to offer a choice in that regard.



well i am the opposite i always liked the vista start menu and never went back to the classic version. i could care less about the removed quick launch bar as i find the programs in the taskbar as icons and the new aero peak features of going from window to windows better than what orher versions of windows have done.

ravewulf 11/26/2009 4:49 AM
Hide
-0+

hakesterman :
People didn't want Vista because it got a unfair bad name early. I've had Vista for three years and it has done an outstanding job for me. It crashes far less than XP did, it was easier to use than Xp and it has more options than XP. Windows 7 is just a deluxe version of Vista, most of the Vista drivers work in Windows 7 because it is Vista deluxe. The media couldn't bad mouth Windows 7 enough this time to keep it down because everyone has worn tired of Xp. So when you fire up your new Windows 7 just think you could of had this two years ago if you didn't listen to all the negative crap and just tried it.


Yup. I'm sticking with Vista on my desktop, I love it. I do have Win7 Pro on my laptop for faster startup times and more battery time, but I don't like that they made Libraries default and took away a lot of the icons in Explorer. I do like everything else about 7 though.

mrmez 11/26/2009 4:51 AM
Hide
-0+

Why is M$ so worried about OSX?
Mac's make up ~10% of the market.

Its like me beating someone 10 times smaller then saying "yeah, look at me, the big tough man"OS

That being said M$ should be worried. Its been losing market share to Mac.

http://successfulsoftware.files.wo [...] 7_2008.png


Ads

Best offers

Newsletters


OK
Ads