Partners
The Games selection
crazy :
PC Breakdown
What is worst than a Fatal Error occuring during a game you did not save? Unleash your rage at your PC in this game. Blow it to pieces, it feels so...
|
adventure :
Scoobydoo: Episode 2
The sequel of Scooby and Sammy's adventures. Same principle as in the previous episode (available on this website). Click on "Instructions" to see...
|
Sponsored links
- Email |
- Print |
- Comment (1) |
- Share
Although the Audigy 2 ZS is not up to the 44.1 kHz native standard (so that it remains a mass market product?), the results on this sampling frequency have greatly improved. Remember that the measurements are made using a loop between the output line and input line 3. The frequency response still suffers from the problems of frequency conversion and thus remains identical to that of previous models - not bad but not all that great either. On the other hand, the signal/noise ratio, the stereo dynamics and separation offer much better results. In other words, they are up to what one might expect from a card of this quality... So the signal/noise ratio has improved from 88 to 97 dB! Strangely, Creative has not made capital out of this improvement.
Distortion has also noticeably diminished (it has halved) but that wasn't the most annoying feature. Intermodulation distortion seems to have undergone a much more drastic reduction but this is only the consequence of the change of measurement method used by the RMAA software. In fact, the previous technique was unsuitable for measuring cards operating at 44.1 kHz and produced unreliable results. It now uses the SMPTE (60 and 7000 Hz) measuring standard. So you can't compare the current measuring results with the previous ones using this criterion.
To enable you to make a visual comparison easily of the improvement in this new card at a frequency of 44.1 kHz we compared it to the Platinum EX, tested previously.
Comparison At 44.1 KHz

Frequency Response : at 44 kHz, both cards have an identical response which soon cuts into treble with ripples probably created by resampling.

Noise level : You will easily realize that the noise level of the ZS is much lower and very consistent.

Motional capacitance : No surprises here, the results match those of the noise level test...

Distortion : Once more the ZS is way ahead of its predecessor! Though remember all the values are in any case very low...

Intermodulation : Measurement standards are different so results should not be compared point by point.

Diaphonie : The ZS is much better than the earlier model which was very good in itself. What more can we say!
- Home Theater Profile Exchange - April 15 2005 [Home Cinema Equipment]
- Home Theater Profile Exchange - April 15 2005 [Home Cinema Equipment]
- Home Theater Profile Exchange - April 15 2005 [Home Theatre]
- Denon receiver as processor [Audio]
- Anamorphic WS laserdiscs [Home Cinema Equipment]
Questions? Ask Tom's community!
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
- Intel's Q4 report out
- New Generation PC 5.1 Speaker Systems
- CPU Buyers' Guide (updated 10 May 2008)
- Phenom 2 920 and 940 Benchmarks
- CPU Temp readings are static
- Core 2 Quad and Duo Temperature Guide
- HOWTO: Overclock C2Q (Quads) and C2D (Duals) - Guide v1.6.1
- Reading cpu temps in CoreTemp and RealTemp?
- Athlon 64 x2 5200+ running extremely cool 14C?!?!?!?!?!
- Q9550 High Idle Temp
- ASUS P5B deluxe audio problem. help please
- No Sound thru SPDIF on IP35
- 5.1 S/PDIF audio problems DS3L
- question: GA-MA78* series and audio out
This rocks, I use it. but creative sucks. I have to use modified X-Fi drivers with modified XP software to get eberything to run, and the remote doesn't work at all. Found intelliremote, recommend it for this, or anything really, can customize the remote to control anything, not jst creative's playcentre thingy :-)