Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Performance Benchmarks: HTML5

Web Browser Grand Prix 3: IE9 Enters The Race
By

Internet Explorer enters the HTML5 competition for the first time with its latest iteration.

GUIMark 2: HTML5 Vector Charting (2 pixels)

This is the original two-pixel version of the GUIMark 2 HTML Vector Charting benchmark.

Opera excels in this test, scoring nearly 35 FPS. The new IE9 achieves a respectable 22 FPS, while Firefox finishes third with 21. Chrome flounders in fourth, achieving just under eight frames. As reported, Safari stutters in this variant of the HTML5 vector charting test, coming in last with only five and a half frames per second. 

GUIMark 2: HTML5 Vector Charting (1 pixel)

This is the single-pixel variant of the GUIMark 2 HTML5 Vector Charting test. The original two-pixel version is reported to have trouble in Safari.

Opera again takes the gold with roughly 35 FPS. Safari shoots up to second place with a score of nearly 30 frames per second. Internet Explorer 9 places third with a slight boost of 1.5 FPS from the two-pixel results. It appears Safari isn't the only Web browser to benefit from the switch to single-pixel; Firefox and Chrome score much better as well. Firerfox reaches just over the 20 FPS mark, while Chrome is just under.

GUIMark 2: HTML5 Bitmap Gaming

IE9 absolutely murders the rest of the pack in this test, scoring just shy of the vaunted 60 frames per second. Google Chrome places second with 36 FPS. Opera grabs third place, with just under 20 frames, while Safari achieves half that score. Again in last place, Firefox receives a score of only seven frames per second.

GUIMark 2: HTML5 Text Column

Microsoft's new entrant into the WBGP again stomps the competition in HTML5 with nearly 52 FPS. Firefox comes in second, yielding just under 40 FPS. Opera, Safari, and Chrome fill out third, fourth, and fifth place, all coming in around 30 FPS.

Ask a Category Expert

Create a new thread in the Reviews comments forum about this subject

Example: Notebook, Android, SSD hard drive

Display all 244 comments.
This thread is closed for comments
Top Comments
  • 20 Hide
    andy5174 , March 21, 2011 4:25 AM
    Will there be a " Web Browser Grand Prix 4: Firefox 4 Enters The Race " after Firefox 4's release (22 Mar)?
  • 19 Hide
    turboflame , March 21, 2011 4:34 AM
    I like how this article was released one day before Firefox 4 is released.
Other Comments
  • 3 Hide
    pirateboy , March 21, 2011 4:17 AM
    I wonder how much microsoft paid tomshardware not to include Firefox 4 RC1
  • 1 Hide
    cruiseoveride , March 21, 2011 4:18 AM
    Now everyone is going to switch from Chrome to IE?
  • 0 Hide
    bison88 , March 21, 2011 4:18 AM
    Nice comparison Adam. I think people don't give MS credit for IE9 because of their history with web standards and lack of competition with updating their browser since they destroyed Netscape so many years ago. Hopefully they have their head in the game and continue with a somewhat constant update cycle. Currently the transition from IE8 to IE9 was somewhat FireFox'ish with speed instead of waiting for another revision of the OS. The browser definitely surprised me, some quirks here and there that are definitely noticeable and the Chrome/FF influence is obviously present. I wish them luck as the competition heats up.
  • 20 Hide
    andy5174 , March 21, 2011 4:25 AM
    Will there be a " Web Browser Grand Prix 4: Firefox 4 Enters The Race " after Firefox 4's release (22 Mar)?
  • 1 Hide
    illuminatuz , March 21, 2011 4:28 AM
    i felt the speed once i switched from firefox to chrome and now chrome to IE..
    but there is no mention of any addon/extentions for IE..
    i mean there is no comparision on who's got nice addons and startup time "with" addons.. since users tend to use web browsers with addons knowingly or un-knowingly..
    it would be better if you include those two comparisions as well.. and who takes advantage of GPU and all..
  • -2 Hide
    winner4455 , March 21, 2011 4:29 AM
    Won't take that long for IE to lag behind.
  • 1 Hide
    illuminatuz , March 21, 2011 4:33 AM
    winner4455Won't take that long for IE to lag behind.

    lol
    maybe not!!
    and FFS why doesnt that "submit my comment" button not working in IE!! I am using chrome for that ;(
  • 19 Hide
    turboflame , March 21, 2011 4:34 AM
    I like how this article was released one day before Firefox 4 is released.
  • 7 Hide
    dimamu15 , March 21, 2011 4:37 AM
    duck it, i stick to firefox.
  • 1 Hide
    Scanlia , March 21, 2011 4:38 AM
    Is there a wrong picture on the efficiency page? The 40tabs graph comes up as GUIMark 2?
  • 1 Hide
    IzzyCraft , March 21, 2011 4:38 AM
    The 40 Tabs chart is wrong for Efficiency Benchmarks: Memory Usage And Management it shows flash vector charting.

    pirateboyI wonder how much microsoft paid tomshardware not to include Firefox 4 RC1

    Then they would have to include every random nightly build of every browser? Comparing the latest release is fair you'll always get one browser or two that is near a new stable version but that's just how it works.

    winner4455Won't take that long for IE to lag behind.

    depends in Microsoft moves up an update schedule that doesn't just include making the browser more secure and fixing bugs. IE8 was pretty snappy back when it was first out it got old in like 3 months compared to other browsers though.
  • 0 Hide
    adamovera , March 21, 2011 4:43 AM
    pirateboyI wonder how much microsoft paid tomshardware not to include Firefox 4 RC1

    We only test final products in the WBGP.
    andy5174Will there be a " Web Browser Grand Prix 4: Firefox 4 Enters The Race " after Firefox 4's release (22 Mar)?

    turboflameI like how this article was released one day before Firefox 4 is released.

    Where are ya'll getting a set date from?
    illuminatuzi felt the speed once i switched from firefox to chrome and now chrome to IE..but there is no mention of any addon/extentions for IE.. i mean there is no comparision on who's got nice addons and startup time "with" addons.. since users tend to use web browsers with addons knowingly or un-knowingly..it would be better if you include those two comparisions as well.. and who takes advantage of GPU and all..

    We add/modify tests every time with the WBGP. We're already looking into those suggestions.
    ScanliaIs there a wrong picture on the efficiency page? The 40tabs graph comes up as GUIMark 2?

    Doh! Fixing that now.
  • 3 Hide
    andy5174 , March 21, 2011 4:51 AM
    Quote:
    Where are ya'll getting a set date from?


    http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.planning/browse_thread/thread/d7cd3c9e9650b1b3
  • -2 Hide
    molo9000 , March 21, 2011 4:53 AM
    Wait a second. Did they really include Safari? Who uses Safari for Windows?
    (I'm assuming they tested the Windows version of Safari, because why would you compare browsers for different systems?)

    I'm sticking with Opera on my Windows machine and Safari on my Mac.
  • 4 Hide
    Benihana , March 21, 2011 4:54 AM
    To be honest I did not read this article, because you're using the "latest and greatest" browsers, but somehow jumped a day early and didn't wait for FF4. Maybe you mentioned it in the article, but if not, then was it really so bad to wait an additional 1-2 days to do this?
  • 0 Hide
    DjEaZy , March 21, 2011 4:58 AM
    ... don't know... but this all is not my experience... why there is no firefox 4.0 RC2 ????
  • 0 Hide
    jezzarisky , March 21, 2011 5:01 AM
    adamoveraWhere are ya'll getting a set date from?



    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/03/16/mozilla_ship_firefox_4_22_march/

    Although most websites link to this website, so perhaps it was nothing more than a rumor.
  • 0 Hide
    andy5174 , March 21, 2011 5:11 AM
    Quote:
    Wait a second. Did they really include Safari? Who uses Safari for Windows?
    (I'm assuming they tested the Windows version of Safari, because why would you compare browsers for different systems?)

    I'm sticking with Opera on my Windows machine and Safari on my Mac.

    Opera sucks balls in memory management and lacks handy add-on such as Tab Mix Plus (which is same for Chrome). I would definitely move to Opera if it has these 2 issues fixed.
  • 0 Hide
    luc2k , March 21, 2011 5:12 AM
    https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/4/Beta

    This article looks like a case of premature e.. something.
  • -3 Hide
    adamovera , March 21, 2011 5:12 AM
    andy5174http://groups.google.com/group/moz [...] 9e9650b1b3

    On the 16th he said RC1 would become the final code on the 22nd, but they released an RC2 since. I don't believe them anymore. Where is an official announcement or press release? RC1 was supposed to be here in November 2010. WBGP3 was going to feature FF4 at the end of 2010, then again at the end of this Feb. IE9 gave a date, so WBGP3 was made to coincide with its release. IF Firefox 4 launches tomorrow, it's purely coincidental. We stopped holding the WBGP series up for FF4 when MS officially gave their IE9 release date.
Display more comments