Shop for Computer Cooling Fans
|
HDT-S1283 CPU Cooler |
Compare the top 5 lowest prices by hovering your mouse over the product names on the left |
$36.99 |
|
Freezer 7 Pro CPU Heatsink | $36.99 | |
|
CNPS9700 LED CPU Cooler | $69.99 | |
|
CL-P0401 V1 CPU Cooler | $69.99 | |
|
CNPS9500 LED CPU Cooler | $54.99 |
The CPU Articles
- Last Passing Maneuver: Tualatin 1266 With 512 kB Versus Athlon And P4
- Hot Spot: How Modern Processors Cope With Heat Emergencies
- Hot Microprocessor News
- Intel Beats AMD To 2 GHz
- AMD's Duron Reaches The Giga Hertz Barrier
- HOT! An Early Look At The New Pentium III (Tualatin or Coppermine-T?)
- AMD's Athlon 1400 and Duron 950
- The First Palomino: AMD Releases Mobile Athlon 4
- Intel Pentium 4 1.7 GHz: More Power For Less Money
- AMD Releases Duron 900
1:06 PM - October 3, 2001 by
Frank Völkel
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: lo
Topics: INTEL, Overclocking
Syndication:
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: lo
Topics: INTEL, Overclocking
Syndication:
Table of Contents:
Office Performance/Windows 2000: Sysmark 2001
In the "Office performance" category, the Intel Celeron 1200 is well ahead of the AMD Duron 1100. Here you can see the effect of Celeron's 256 kB L2 cache.
Internet Performance/Windows 2000: Sysmark 2001
The difference in the Sysmark 2001 "Internet content creation" category is huge: the Celeron 1200 leads with close to 30 percent more performance.
Office Performance/Windows 2000: Sysmark 2001
The Celeron 1200's advantage in "office productivity" is not as great.
3D Rendering Performance/Windows 2000: Cinema 4D XL
This benchmark just slightly favors the AMD Duron 1100.
- Previous page Direct3D Performance/Windows 2000:...
- Next page CPU And Memory Performance/Windows...
