Lo-Cost Duel: Duron 1100 vs. Celeron 1200
Features
By
Frank Völkel
published
Office Performance/Windows 2000: Sysmark 2001
In the "Office performance" category, the Intel Celeron 1200 is well ahead of the AMD Duron 1100. Here you can see the effect of Celeron's 256 kB L2 cache.
Internet Performance/Windows 2000: Sysmark 2001
The difference in the Sysmark 2001 "Internet content creation" category is huge: the Celeron 1200 leads with close to 30 percent more performance.
Office Performance/Windows 2000: Sysmark 2001
The Celeron 1200's advantage in "office productivity" is not as great.
3D Rendering Performance/Windows 2000: Cinema 4D XL
This benchmark just slightly favors the AMD Duron 1100.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Current page: Office Performance/Windows 2000: Sysmark 2001
Prev Page Direct3D Performance/Windows 2000: Unreal Tournament Next Page CPU And Memory Performance/Windows 2000: SiSoft Sandra 2001TOPICS
No comments yet
Comment from the forums