3DMark helps quantify the performance of many different variables, including a system's CPU. The $2600 machine’s hexa-core processor establishes a significant advantage at the benchmark’s Entry preset. The $1300 PC’s big graphics card steps up its game at the Extreme preset. And the $650 machine struggles to keep up using lower-cost parts.
PCMark’s overall score is tremendously drive-dependent, slamming the $650 build for its use of a mechanical disk. The $2600 PC also looks somewhat bad at its default settings, but only because we were still using Intel's RSTe driver in that out-of-the-box configuration.
Reverting to Windows' AHCI storage driver gives the overclocked $2600 PC a second boost, though it never gets close to performing twice as fast as the $1300 machine.
A breakdown of a few PCMark tests helps demonstrate how well an SSD can perform. We also see where Intel's data integrity-oriented enterprise driver hampers performance, and how far mechanical hard drives trail behind. Because these tests approximate the loads we run on a frequent basis, they are also used in the hard drive rating of our average performance chart.
- Three Well-Built Machines Face Off
- Benchmark And Overclock Settings
- Benchmark Results: 3DMark And PCMark
- Benchmark Results: SiSoftware Sandra
- Benchmark Results: Battlefield 3
- Benchmark Results: DiRT 3
- Benchmark Results: The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
- Benchmark Results: StarCraft II
- Benchmark Results: Audio And Video Encoding
- Benchmark Results: Productivity
- Power And Efficiency
- Three Different Goals, One Value Conclusion