Bringing Home The Bass: 2.1-Channel Speaker Roundup
Table of contents
- 1. Bass Basics
- 2. Corsair SP2500
- 3. Creative Gigaworks T3
- 4. Klipsch Promedia 2.1
- 5. Logitech Z623
Is it just us, or are 5.1- and 7.1-channel speaker systems impractical for PCs? In our 2.1 speaker roundup, we look at the Corsair SP2500 and Antec/Soundscience Rockus 3D|2.1, along with the Creative Gigaworks 3D, Klipsch Promedia 2.1, and Logitech Z623.
If you’re a PC user who hasn’t experienced what a subwoofer can do, you owe it to yourself to try one out. Strong bass brings incredible power to game sounds, and extends the range of music much lower than a two-speaker setup can achieve. If you want to feel those explosions and rhythms, a subwoofer isn’t an option. It’s a necessity.
Creative, Logitech, and Klipsch are well-known names when it comes to 2.1-channel PC audio systems, but Corsair and Antec (under a new audio/video division named Soundscience) have dipped their toes into the market with some new products that we have the pleasure of reviewing today.
We put the following PC speaker systems through the paces—some are new, while others have been around for quite a while—but all represent the premium 2.1-channel offerings from their respective brands:
| Corsair SP2500 | Creative Gigaworks T3 | Klipsch Promedia 2.1 | Logitech Z623 | Soundscience Rockus 3D|2.1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power: | 232 W by FTC guidelines | 80 W nominal RMS | 200 W peak | 200 W RMS | 150 W maximum |
| Satellites: (two) | 1" 10 W tweeter 3" 40 W driver | 2" 15 W driver | 0.75" tweeter 3" woofer | 2.5" 35 W driver | 2.5" 25 W driver |
| Subwoofer: | 8" 120 W driver | three 6.5" drivers 50 W total | 6.5" 130 W driver | 7" 130 W driver | 6" 100 W driver |
| Inputs: | 1/8" jack (remote) 1/8" jack (sub) RCA jacks (sub) | 1/8" jack (remote) RCA jacks (sub) | 1/8" cable (satellite) 1/8" jack (satellite) | 1/8" cable (satellite) 1/8" jack (satellite) 1/8" jack (sub) RCA jacks (sub) | 1/8" jack (sub) RCA jacks (sub) optical (sub) |
| Outputs: | 1/8" headphone (remote) | 1/8" headphone (remote) | 1/8" headphone (satellite) | 1/8" headphone (satellite) | N/A |
| Controls: | Volume, subwoofer, EQ presets, effects | Volume, subwoofer | Volume, bass | Volume, bass | Volume, input, 3D |
| Dimensions: | 6.3" x 4.3" x 4.7" satellite (2) 11.7" x 18.1" x 10.2" subwoofer | 5.9" x 3.0" x 3.7" satellite (2) 8.4" x 9.3" x 11.3" subwoofer | 8.5" x 4.2" x 5.67" satellite (2) 9.5" x 9.8" x 10.2" subwoofer | 7.75" x 4.5" x 4.75" satellite (2) 12" x 11" x 10" subwoofer | 5.7" x 4.7" x 6.3" satellite (2) 13.8" x 7.7" x 10.2" subwoofer |
| Weight: | 2 lbs. satellite (2) 19.2 lbs. subwoofer | 0.8 lbs. satellite (2) 13 lbs. subwoofer | 2.1 lbs. satellite (2) 11 lbs. subwoofer | 1.6 lbs. satellite (2) 13 lbs. subwoofer | 1.4 lbs. satellite (2) 13 lbs. subwoofer |
| Accessories: | 1/8" mini-to-RCA splitter cable, two satellite tilt stands, wired remote with color LCD display | 1/8" mini-to-RCA splitter cable, wired remote | 1/8" input cable (attached to satellite) | 1/8" input cable (attached to satellite) | 1/8" mini-to-RCA splitter cable, 1/8" input cable, wired remote |
| Price: | $249.00 (MSRP) | $249.99 (us.store.creative.com) | $154.99 (bestbuy.com) | $146.99 (newegg.com) | $249.99 (newegg.com) |
| Warranty: | two years | one year | one year | two years | two years |
- 1 / 5
- Next
-
Latest Miscellaneous News
- 05/28 – Samsung's First PIN Pop-up Stores Hit London Tomorrow
- 05/28 – UK's New Cookie Law Is in Effect (But Lots Aren't...
- 05/28 – Intel Picks UK for Research Institute on Sustainable Cities
- 05/27 – U.S. Hacks Al-Qaeda Affiliate Website in Yemen
- 05/25 – Specs for Dell's Windows 8 Clover Trail Tablet Leaked
Latest Miscellaneous reviews
-
Latest Klipsch News
- Deals for May 14: SSD Price Check Roundup
-
Latest Klipsch reviews
- Bringing Home The Bass: 2.1-Channel Speaker Roundup
It's you: Where the hell are my 5.1 sets?
Interesting.. thanks for the article.
Dang, I was hoping you guys would look at the Swan M10s.
Wow, those freq response graphs are pretty telling that computer speakers are basically all trash. The bass peaks and generally crappiness in the mid range seem to be a common theme. Almost no consideration seems to be given to music listening.
2.1 is the ideal setup for a computer imo. 4.1 at most. A center channel just isn't needed for monitor sized screens.
You can buy a cheap onkyo receiver, some low end bookshelf speakers and a small sub for a few hundred bucks and have sound that will destroy the best pc speakers.
The fact is, pc speakers are toys. There is no high end option. What they market as high end would be laughed out the door by the regular audio comminuty.
p.s. Plastic is not an acceptable cabinet material
this is what frequency response graphs of decent speakers should look like.
http://www.speakerdesignworks.com/ [...] ePlots.JPG
My Logitech G51 speakers have a Headphone and mic passthrough on the remote.
this is a frequency response graph of the first diy speaker I built from a popular design. This is a super budget MTM speaker.
http://www.speakerdesignworks.com/TritrixMTMfr.gif
Wow, those freq response graphs are pretty telling that computer speakers are basically all trash. The bass peaks and generally crappiness in the mid range seem to be a common theme. Almost no consideration seems to be given to music listening.2.1 is the ideal setup for a computer imo. 4.1 at most. A center channel just isn't needed for monitor sized screens.You can buy a cheap onkyo receiver, some low end bookshelf speakers and a small sub for a few hundred bucks and have sound that will destroy the best pc speakers. The fact is, pc speakers are toys. There is no high end option. What they market as high end would be laughed out the door by the regular audio comminuty.p.s. Plastic is not an acceptable cabinet material
Pretty much this. I've been telling people for ages that their super-duper PC speakers aren't. Any brand that quotes max power over RMS values raises an instant red flag for me. Even 20yr old Radioshack shelf speakers can run circles on most modern PC speakers.
I die a little bit every time I hear someone with a premium add-in sound card is running generic PC speakers.
This is all Go out and buy it junk. Build your own and end up with something that rattles the neighbors nerves if done right.
For all those who trash all PC speakers, they're usually the best option on the lower end of the scale. There are people out there who have compared entry level (sub 400) active speakers to the Klipsch Promedia set (best active speakers ~150 for sound quality imo) and they say that they're not that different. If you do it right, then it's not as bad as you might think.
Wow, those freq response graphs are pretty telling that computer speakers are basically all trash.
If you know audio, you know that the environment has a *MASSIVE* effect on response recording. Even moving the mic a few inches in the same environment can change the result by a large amount.
As we've stressed in the article, we don't have the luxury of a professional-grade anechoic chamber for testing. Our results are likely heavily degraded by comb filtering and phase cancellation, but they can be used to compare speaker output to each other because they were all tested in the same conditions.
The bottom line is, don't write these products off based on a response taken in less than ideal conditions.
Use these response graphs for what they are good for--not absolute, but relative measurements.
I would be interested to compare these with the Harman Kardon 2.1 soundsticks III, which i own and i am very happy with, even though they are (only) rated @ 20W RMS (Sub) + 2 x 10W RMS (satellites).
It's just you (guys). Gamer immersion? IMHO more channels is more important for gaming than for watching movies (which I also do with my 7.1 setup; TV speakers = 2 additional).
Simple rules for buying good speakers (and anything peripheral):
-Stay away from wireless
-You can't really go wrong with Logitech, Bose or Altec Lansing (though not as good as they used to be)
-High RMS/Watt output means next to nothing (unless you're deaf and need speakers at high volume all the time and don't care about quality of tone)
This is all Go out and buy it junk. Build your own and end up with something that rattles the neighbors nerves if done right.
I'm all for building your own, except most people won't know the properties that are important for stereo systems and will wind up with sub-par performance compared to cheap store-bought crap. If you're just after rattling your neighbors nerves then you're just a douche.
Audiophiles dissing common audio listeners = Hardcore PC gamers dissing console gamers
Typical...
I upgraded my computer speakers this holiday season and let me just say they are AMAZING now. I can't believe how much better real speakers are than PC speakers. I also tossed in a high end sound card and my music experience is surreal.
If anyone is curious, google for "WAF-1 Rosewood Pair" the price they are selling for right now is a STEAL right now. Unfortunately they ran out of the matching 2-channel amp, so you need to find an amp elsewhere. I also picked up a BIC V1020 subwoofer because I like dance music. I'll never go back to normal PC speakers again.
Price wise, it's the equivalent of getting a top-tier video card, but for your sound system.
I've no regret till now of my 1.5 years old Logitech Z2300 ;-)
Wow, those freq response graphs are pretty telling that computer speakers are basically all trash. The bass peaks and generally crappiness in the mid range seem to be a common theme. Almost no consideration seems to be given to music listening.2.1 is the ideal setup for a computer imo. 4.1 at most. A center channel just isn't needed for monitor sized screens.You can buy a cheap onkyo receiver, some low end bookshelf speakers and a small sub for a few hundred bucks and have sound that will destroy the best pc speakers. The fact is, pc speakers are toys. There is no high end option. What they market as high end would be laughed out the door by the regular audio comminuty.p.s. Plastic is not an acceptable cabinet material
I've been saying this for years. It is 100% true.
As per damasvara's comment about audiophiles dissing casual listeners, nothing could be further form the truth. We are not criticizing you, we are criticizing these low end speakers! We are trying to tell you that there are much better products out there for the money. Come, join us, you'll never look back.
Much more expensive but please vbuild and review a system like this:
B&W CM5 + Rotel RC-1550 + Rotel RB-1552 + Optical Out Sound Card
I'll never fall for another overpriced computer-specific speaker system. SPDIF connected to Home Theater receiver and a set of decent 5.1 HT speakers works for me well and adds the flexibility of multiple inputs and a fully featured remote, also has EQ, compression for night time listening, etc. Movie surround modes work great for games too.
My Bose Companion 3 is doing great, and have the auxiliary jacks you´re asking. It should be on a next test.