Access time and I/O performance are hardly relevant on portable memory products, such as these SD cards. Access time, particularly, is low on the list of must-consult metrics. However, I/O performance may be of interest for a small fraction of our readers, as it is indeed possible to run a full system installation on an SD or CompactFlash memory card. Industrial PC designs and systems based on the smallest form factors are possible use cases.
Read access time is equally quick on all of the SD cards in the test bed...
...while write access time differs significantly. The slowest product, PQI’s SDXC C10 card, actually requires 1.37 seconds, on average, to commence write operation. Keep in mind that this doesn’t really impact users working with digital cameras. But the benchmark triggers multiple random access operations, which the cards oftentimes fail to respond to in a quick fashion.
Since these cards were designed to read and write data sequentially, they are not very impressive when it comes to performing random read/write operations at varying block sizes. Most of the SD cards are comparable to hard drives from somewhere around 1995. Only SanDisk’s Extreme shows reasonable performance.
The Web server I/O test pattern does not involve write operation, which is why all cards deliver 3-4x performance of a conventional 2.5” hard drive.
- High-Speed And High-Capacity SD Memory Cards Tested
- SD Memory Card Performance And Standards
- USB 3.0 Card Reader: Pretec P240
- Kingston Ultimate XX (8, 16, 32 GB)
- Lexar Professional 133x (16, 32 GB)
- PQI SDXC C10 (64 GB)
- SanDisk Extreme Pro (16 GB)
- Comparison Table And Test Setup
- Benchmark Results: Access Time And I/O Performance
- Benchmark Results: Random Read/Write
- Benchmark Results: Sequential Reads/Writes
- Benchmark Results: Read/Write Throughput
- Benchmark Results: Combined Read/Write Throughput