- Workstation Power: ATi's FireGL X1 under Linux
- Digicams: New Little Megapixel Monsters, Part II
- VGA Charts II: High-End Systems
- ATI Delivers: The Radeon 9500 PRO
- Video Editing For Beginners: Matrox RT.X10
- GeForceFX: NVIDIA goes Hollywood?
- Pixel-Churners: A round-up of Radeon 9700 PRO cards
- ATI Increases Its Lead: The New Radeon 9700, 9500 PRO and 9500
- NV18 & NV28: NVIDIA Chips with AGP-8x Flavor
- HLSL's, Cg and the RenderMonkey
- E8400 or Q6600? For FSX
- 8800GTS vs x3850.... Which is better?
- Why is X64 6400+ not performing?
- Why doesn't Toms maintain this chart anymore?
- FSX CPU quandry, E or Q?
- My Quad/Dual Dilema
- IS SLI REALLY WORTH IT FOR GAMING?
- P5KC vs DS3L
- Combinate Water-, Air- and Heatsink-cooling system?
- Overclock pointless for Gaming?
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: vga, charts, ii
Topics: Build Your Own
Syndication:
VGA Charts II - Part II

While the first part of the Tom's Hardware Guide VGA Charts focused on high-end system, this time we're interested in how 31 video cards fare when coupled with a slow machine. For this purpose, we'll compare our existing results achieved with the Athlon XP 2700+ system from the first round to those of an Athlon 1000 system based on a VIA KT 133A chipset with 256 MB CL2 RAM.
To round off our survey, we'll also check out the performance of 13 current cards with 8x anisotropic filtering, 4x full scene anti-aliasing and a combination of both, as a test of the highest quality setting that is still playable. These tests are also run in 1024x768-32, which makes them virtuall unplayable on older-generation cards.
A new addition to the low-end (if that's what you want to call this system) tests is the 64 MB version of the Kyro II, which we couldn't test on the newer motherboards due to its 3.3V AGP 2X interface. The Kyro II SE, which already uses the more modern 1.5V AGP 4X interface was unfortunately not available to us for testing. The Matrox Parhelia, meanwhile, proved to be incompatible with our KT 133A motherboard (ABIT KT7A). Although the system would start up, the screen remained blank. Therefore we were unable to record any results for this card on the Athlon 1000 system.
For the sake of consistency, all Ati cards were tested using version 2.5 of the Catalyst driver. Besides, the newer Catalyst 3.0 was not available at the time the tests were conducted. Also, DirectX 9 would have affected our results.
- Next page Test Setup